Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Latest Posts

Alcohol Use & Abuse in the US – New Research

An important new study related to Americans’ use (and abuse) of alcohol was recently published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.  I caught up with Revolution Health’s addictions specialist, Bruce Phariss, MD to get his perspective on this very common, yet often disabling addiction.

Dr. Val: Is there anything surprising or new
presented in this study?  If so, what is it?

Dr. Phariss: It
isn’t necessarily surprising, but it is striking that 30% of Ameicans have an
alcohol problem at some point in their lives.  Alcohol problems often develop
slowly and no one “notices” that it has become a problem until well after the
fact.  That’s why it takes 10 years on average for those that get treatment to
actually get the treatment.  The study also highlights the fact that a huge gap
exists between those needing treatment and those receiving treatment.  We’re
still not doing a very good job in the treatment community of getting the word
out there that treatment is available and that treatment
works.

Dr. Val: Why do you think that only 25% of
people with alcohol abuse problems get treatment?

Dr. Phariss: Three things:  First, denial and stigma keep many “unaware” that they have a
problem.  The first step in the stages of how people change behaviors is
awareness.  If you don’t know you have a problem, you can’t change it.  Along
this same line, if alcoholism is viewed as a moral failing instead of as a
medical condition, then good, moral people don’t think they can be alcoholics.
That’s good logic, but unfortunately, alcohol is non-discriminatory and even
good, moral people develop alcohol problems.  Fighting through that
generalization of stigma is too tough for many people and they never seek
treatment or attempt to change their behavior.

Second, our cultural still
galmorizes drinking and drugging.  Although the hype surrounding the many young
starlets currently in rehab centers appears to say how tough these addictions
are to kick, the overall slant is to add cache to the celebrity.  It’s cool to
need rehab, it’s cool to be that out of control with alcohol and substances,
it’s almost synonymous with celebrity of a certain type.  Sadly, this message
influences the behavior of many Americans, especially the under 25 crowd, who
are the most venerable to developing addictive behaviors.

Third, many people stop on their
own without treatment.  Almost anyone who does find their way into treatment of
any kind (AA, treatment programs, etc.) has tried to stop on their own at least
once, maybe a hundred times.  Just think of the many times you’ve heard someone
say “New Year’s Eve is my last day of drinking” or “I’m going to give up booze
for Lent and not pick it up again” or, my favorite, “I can give it up any time I
want….”  In fact, some of the 75% of the people who need to deal with their
drinking do deal with it on their own.  But many others need help of some kind.
Breaking down barriers to treatment — access and psychological and financial
barriers — remains the goal of the treatment community.

Dr. Val:  What sorts of interventions might be
most useful (on a personal and on a national scale) to reduce alcohol abuse and
dependence?

The debate on a national level as to how to intervene to reduce alcohol
abuse and dependence is ongoing and heated at times.  However, many intervention
and prevention programs focus on underage, college age and the under 25-year-old
drinkers.  If you don’t a drink until age 21 you are four or five times less
likely to develop an alcohol problem than someone who drinks before the age of
21.  But underage and college age drinkers are becoming more numerous, not less,
so we must be doing something wrong.  A few colleges have taken an approach I
like:  in addition to providing counseling, supporting AA meetings by providing
space, a few colleges have taken to trying to change the “perceived norm” about
drinking on campus.  Although in fact most kids on campus do not binge drink on
a regular basis, the perception by incoming freshman is that everyone drinks
more than they do.  This holds true for the guy who drinks two six packs a day
(clearly way too much)….he actually thinks that the majority of students drink
more than he does.  What is a motivating emotional factor for college students:
they want to be accepted, to be a regular, normal guy or girl.  If the
perception is that normal is to drink a bucket, then as a group they will be
more likely to drink heavily.  A few colleges have taken the simple step of
making the student body aware that, in fact, most students do not drink to
excess.  That simple step has helped to curb the trend of more and more alcohol
on campus.

Dr. Val: What’s the take-home message to be
gleaned from this study?

Dr. Phariss: The take-home message is that the medical profession has a long way to go in
de-stimatizing treatment for alcohol use disorders and that the substance abuse
treatment community remains too distant, too inaccessible and too timid in
announcing that treatment works.  As the AA slogan says:  “It works if you work
it, so work it, you’re worth it.”
This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.

The Cutest Patient Ever

I was really touched by Signout’s blog post about a charming octogenarian.  It’s patients like these that make you glad to be a doctor… Signout writes:

I have a secret crush on one of my patients, an 85-year old man
who’s recovering from a bad pneumonia. After a weeklong stay in the
intensive care unit, he has recovered at a remarkable pace: the day
after he was extubated, he was out of bed with a physical therapist,
making his way slowly around the ward with a walker and a big smile.

What motivates him to work so hard at recovery, the
nurses say, is his love for his wife. They have been married 60 years.
She comes in to see him every day, wheeled around by their daughter.
The whole time she is there, they say, he holds her hand as if it is
the last time he will see her…

This man is the cutest patient ever… and the dear fellow reminds me of my husband (only a little bit older – the patient is older, not my husband – er, you see what I mean).  One of my single friends asked me how I knew that Steve was the man I wanted to marry, I told them this:

“One day it suddenly occurred to me that if I had a traumatic brain injury or suffered from severe dementia and was totally incapacitated – Steve would faithfully care for me, never leave my side, and devote his entire life to my recovery or best quality of life.  When I realized that he would do this for me without a second thought… I knew I had to marry him.”

Now, I’m not sure that Steve finds that image particularly romantic – but I do.  It’s a doctor thing I guess.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.

Allergy Sufferers Should Generally Avoid Cats

New research suggests that people with allergies to molds, pollen, and dust mites but NOT cat dander, may have heightened asthmatic reactions to their usual triggers in the presence of cats.  This is unfortunate news for cat owners or anyone who is fond of kitties but has environmental allergens.  Researchers note that :

Avoidance of cat exposure would be beneficial to a much wider
population than previously expected. Furthermore, cat allergen levels
were ubiquitous in cat-owning communities, and their results showed
effects of cat allergen exposure at lower levels than generally
regarded necessary to produce a measurable result.

So basically, if you live in a “cat-owning community,” their airborne fluff will probably make your pollen and mold-induced asthma worse.  Aside from declining to pet and/or play with them, I doubt that there’s much you can do to completely avoid their dander.  But there is some cause for all allergy sufferers to eye cats with suspicion… time to trade in Tiger for Fido?

[View cat allergy cartoon]This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.

Can You Teach an Old Drug New Tricks?

There’s a new trend in the pharmaceutical industry: repurposing old drugs for new indications and/or combining current drugs to create brand new effects.  Recent studies suggest that two drugs (Lyrica and Neurontin) approved for the treatment of neuropathic (nerve) pain may also be helpful for improving sleep quality.  And since disordered sleep is also at the root of conditions like fibromyalgia, there seems to be reason for enthusiasm.  Another study suggests that Wellbutrin (an anti-depressant often used as a smoking cessation aid) could be useful for enhancing libido.  Again, some cause for celebration – quit smoking AND improve your sex life with one pill?  Not bad.

The New York Times describes the new trend in drug combination research – robots combine random drugs to see if together they have stronger effects on tissue cultures than they do alone.  Sounds like low-brow trial and error, but companies such as CombinatoRx are betting that this approach will turn up potential therapeutic benefits at a faster rate (and at much lower costs) than the old-fashioned process of original drug research and development.

This should be handled with a healthy dose of skepticism – is combining nexium (a stomach acid reducer) and naproxen (pain medicine that can harm the stomach lining) anything more than a commercial gimmick?  What about the chance finding that anticoagulants enhance the effects of inflammation-reducing steroids?  Perhaps that is indeed relevant and helpful?

It’s clear that testing drug combinations has the potential to create a financial windfall for pharmaceutical companies – so the FDA will need to make sure that these new combo drugs offer real benefits over taking them separately.

Still, if you asked me where I’d rather put my research dollars – testing unusual drug combinations in Petri dishes or analyzing whether or not water has memory (a foundational principle of homeopathy), I think you know where I’d place my bet.

Go ahead and shuffle and re-deal, Big Pharma.  Maybe you and the FDA will uncover something useful after all?  We’ll be watching with interest and a critical eye.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.

Sicko: Personalized Medicine, Impersonal Healthcare

There were a series of amusing anecdotes presented at the
very beginning of Sicko.  Various people
were denied coverage by health plans for things that didn’t have the right
coding or were submitted incorrectly.
One woman received a message that her ambulance transportation to the
hospital from the scene of a car accident (where she was knocked unconscious)
was not covered by her health insurance because she did not obtain pre-approval
for the ambulance ride.  She asks, “When
could I have called for pre-approval?
It’s hard to get permission when you’re unconscious.”

Another person was declined coverage because he was too thin
(he was six feet tall and only 130 pounds), and one young woman was
denied because she was overweight (5’1” and 175 pounds).

While these denials are laughable, they are ridiculous
specifically because they are decisions that appear to be made by a computer –
or perhaps by applying inflexible rules to real life scenarios without the
benefit of human interpretation.  [See my cartoon on the subject.]

And as we consider Mr. Moore’s proposed solution to the apparent
capriciousness of health insurance company coverage policies – we see that his
single-payer solution is really no different.
He is trading one impersonal decision maker for another.  Big government is no more capable of
delivering personally relevant care than is the health insurance industry.  The problem with both is that they take
decision-making away from the patient and those closest to their situation – the providers who have a
much better sense of what is needed and appropriate.

As a physician it really upsets me when a third party payer denies coverage of an important treatment to my patient.  I understand that we have to have some broad, population-based rules for medical coverage as a means for cost containment – but a one-size-fits-all system will always fail some people.  We physicians are regularly on the phone on their behalf, explaining to appeals associates why our patient needs X, Y, or Z… and then have to re-explain the medical necessity up the chain of command until a Medical Director is finally reached, who then has no incentive (other than basic human decency) to give in to the pleading physician’s request on behalf of her patient.  We (and our staff) spend uncompensated hours upon hours doing this every week.

And Medicare creates rules to deny coverage to people too (and it probably doesn’t save on administrative costs over health insurance plans anyway, notes Charlie Baker at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc.).   So from a physician’s perspective it feels as if we’ve had our clinical judgment usurped by bureaucracy and for-profit health insurance companies.  We have been reduced to claims advocates rather than clinicians.  It is exhausting and infuriating – and I don’t see this improving any time soon (and neither does Paul Levy at Harvard).

Healthcare is not free, as Dr. Leap points out, and unfortunately it’s also not personal.  And that’s what I am lamenting – the depersonalization of medical care.  My patients will not be able to make a full range of informed choices with my help – they will be given a very limited menu of options from their third party payer – who will argue that they are not limiting care because the patient can always pay out-of-pocket for anything their physician believes is necessary, but is not covered under their plan.  And so where does that leave the patient on a modest income?  Effectively, they are indeed limited to the options covered by their third-party payer.  And this is so ironic, given the new push for personalized medicine (optimizing individual treatment via genetic testing, etc.)  In the end it seems that we’re aiming for personalized medicine and an impersonal healthcare system. And maybe that’s part of what’s “sicko” about all of this.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »

Commented - Most Popular Articles