Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (7)

Fecal Transplants: Getting To The Bottom Of The Matter

Photo Credit: authenticmaya.com

Photo Credit: authenticmaya.com

The blogosphere has been buzzing lately about the idea of “fecal transplants,” probably because this treatment (first studied in the 80′s) was recently mentioned on Grey’s Anatomy. Proponents of the therapy (which involves the introduction of donor stool into a patient via enema or naso-gastric tube) say that it can rejuvenate intestinal flora and cure c. diff colitis, and various inflammatory bowel disorders. I had my doubts about these claims and decided to interview gastroenterologist Dr. Brian Fennerty to get to the bottom (sorry abou the bad pun) of this issue.

Dr. Fennerty is a Professor of Medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon, where he also serves as Section Chief of Gastroenterology.

Listen to the podcast here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Dr. Val: What exactly is a “fecal transplant?”

Dr. Fennerty: First, by way of background, you need to understand that the GI tract is populated with thousands of varieties of “good” bacteria that are essential for our health. If we didn’t have bacteria in our colon and small intestine, we would die. Fecal transplantation is the repopulation of a person’s gut bacteria (flora) with fecal matter from somebody else. Some argue that this helps to treat certain diseases.

Dr. Val: How is this procedure performed?

Dr. Fennerty: As it was originally described, fecal transplantation involved removing the undigested food particles from the stool sample of a “healthy” person, and then spinning it so that a pellet (of hundreds of thousands of species and quasi-species of bacteria) remains. The pellet is then introduced to the patient through a nasogastric tube into the small intestine, or the pellet can be resuspended in liquid and introduced into the rectum via an enema. The idea is that the bacteria will colonize the patient’s colon and squeeze out the bad bacteria that are in there.

Dr. Val: What are fecal transplants purported to do?

Dr. Fennerty: The theory is that some diseases are caused by an imbalance of good and bad bacteria in the human gut. The imbalance could be caused by antibiotic use or exposure to bad bacteria like clostridium difficile (c. diff). The argument is that introducing fecal bacteria from another person can promote colonization of the colon and intestines so that the gut ecosystem is shifted away from bad bacterial colonies and towards good ones.

Dr. Val: What is the current evidence for fecal transplantation?

Dr. Fennerty: There have been a few observations that patients with c. diff colitis have improved after fecal transplantations. I use the term “observations” because the only way that we can be certain that the treatment is benefitting the patient (and it’s not just time that’s benefitting the patient) is to do a controlled trial. That means that half of the patients would receive a fecal transplant and the other half would receive either no treatment or a placebo. Then we’d have to see if the ultimate outcomes of those two groups is different. The fecal transplant literature to date is purely observational. So we’d like to think that patients get better with fecal transplants but we don’t know that for sure.

Dr. Val: Why wouldn’t people just eat yogurt (or good lactobacillus bacteria) instead of replacing all their flora with someone else’s mix of good and bad?

Dr. Fennerty: Probiotics use a few strains of bacteria that we know are safe and healthy for the gut. The fact is that we don’t know which strains of good bacteria are the best at repopulating the gut and protecting against disease. Most of the information we have on probiotics is observational – so we really don’t know how much good they do.

Fecal transplant proponents argue that stool contains all the possible choices, so it has a better chance of treating disease. Probiotic proponents argue that fecal transplants are uneccessarily risky because they convey all sorts of negative pathogens along with the good ones. They argue that it’s best to stick with one form of good bacteria (such as lactobacillus) since it’s known to be safe. There is a real rift forming between these two camps, with lots of interesting theories but no real evidence for any of the claims.

Dr. Val: So what are the risks of fecal transplantation?

Dr. Fennerty: Our colons are not just full of bacteria, but they can also be populated with viruses, fungi, and protozoa. Fecal transplants can transmit HIV, mad cow (prion) disease, e. coli, shigella and other dysentery-causing infectious agents. So the medical community is very concerned about the potential for fecal transplants to transmit dangerous and even deadly illnesses. We can’t control all these pathogens with laboratory tests – some (especially prions) can avoid detection. It’s impossible to declare a stool sample safe with our current technology. In addition, we have no substantial evidence at this point that fecal transplants actually improve c. diff infections or inflammatory bowel disease.

Dr. Val: What should Americans know about fecal transplants?

Dr. Fennerty: They should know that this is not a new treatment, it’s been around for decades. Even though intuitively the treatment makes sense, until we know how to do it safely (and we have good evidence that it’s worthwhile in the first place) we have to temper our enthusiasm. That’s a very difficult thing to tell someone who has a disease. But fecal transplants are simply not ready for prime time.
 


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


7 Responses to “Fecal Transplants: Getting To The Bottom Of The Matter”

  1. marilyn says:

    Doesn’t it make more sense to work on studying the population of flora in the “healthy” intestine, then create the probiotic supplement (or suppository,or whatever works best) that contains the strains present?

    There’s no way I would accept a treatment that carries similar risk to fecal transplant.

  2. Portia says:

    I wonder if fecal donors will be able to ‘sell’ their life saving product at a fecal bank much like plasma banks. Hey, why not?

  3. Strong One says:

    Once again we discuss the subtle but major difference between theoretical applied medical science and evidence based practice.
    It may sound good.. and even look good. But has it been trialed.
    Thanks again for the oh-so appropriate timing of this article.
    I for one have known about this treatment for quite some time now.

  4. bongi says:

    this is a whole lot of crap!!

  5. jeanie3 says:

    Does that mean we're close to finding out if it's safe here in the U.S. yet? What exactly is the 'hold-up' so to speak? If it can help even a few hundred patients, why isn't anyone in the medical profession doing anything to start some serious 'studies' on the procedure? My friend has C. Diff., we're praying it's not the 'serious type', and we're hoping she won't have to get to this stage.

  6. jeanie3 says:

    Does that mean we're close to finding out if it's safe here in the U.S. yet? What exactly is the 'hold-up' so to speak? If it can help even a few hundred patients, why isn't anyone in the medical profession doing anything to start some serious 'studies' on the procedure? My friend has C. Diff., we're praying it's not the 'serious type', and we're hoping she won't have to get to this stage.

  7. Linda Seybert says:

    Dear Doctor,

    I am allergic to antibiotics, expecially fluoraquinolones, and have c-diff. Where can I get a fecal transplant in the United States. I live in Los Angeles, CA.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

How To Make Inpatient Medical Practice Fun Again: Try Locum Tenens Work

It s no secret that most physicians are unhappy with the way things are going in healthcare. Surveys report high levels of job dissatisfaction burn out and even suicide. In fact some believe that up to a third of the US physician work force is planning to leave the profession…

Read more »

Caring For Winter Olympians In Sochi: An Interview With Team USA’s Chief Medical Officer Dr. Gloria Beim

I am a huge fan of the winter Olympics partly because I grew up in Canada where most kids can ski and skate before they can run and partly because I used to participate in Downhill ski racing. Now that I m a rehab physician with a reconstructed knee I…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

Richmond, VA – In an effort to simplify inpatient medical billing, one area hospitalist group has determined that “altered mental status” (ICD-9 780.97) is the most efficient code for use in any patient work up.

“When you enter a hospital, you’re bound to have some kind of mental status change,” said Dr. Fishbinder, co-partner of Area Hospitalists, PLLC. “Whether it’s confusion about where your room is located in relationship to the visitor’s parking structure, frustration with being woken up every hour or two to check your vital signs, or just plain old fatigue from being sick, you are not thinking as clearly as before you were admitted. And that’s all the justification we need to order anything from drug and toxin screens, to blood cultures, brain MRIs, tagged red blood cell nuclear scans, or cardiac Holter monitoring. There really is no limit to what we can pursue with our tests.”

Common causes of mental status changes in the elderly include medicine-induced cognitive side effects, disorientation due to disruption in daily routines, age-related memory impairment, and urinary tract infections.

“The urinalysis is not a very exciting medical test,” stated Dr. Fishbinder. “It doesn’t matter that it’s cheap, fast, and most likely to provide an explanation for strange behavior in hospitalized patients. It’s really not as elegant as the testing involved in a chronic anemia or metabolic encephalopathy work up. I keep it in my back pocket in case all other tests are negative, including brain MRIs and PET scans.”

Nursing staff at Richmond Medical Hospital report that efforts to inform hospitalists about foul smelling urine have generally fallen on deaf ears. “I have tried to tell the hospitalists about cloudy or bloody urine that I see in patients who are undergoing extensive work ups for mental status changes,” reports nurse Sandy Anderson. “But they insist that ‘all urine smells bad’ and it’s really more of a red herring.”

Another nurse reports that delay in diagnosing urinary tract infections (while patients are scheduled for brain MRIs, nuclear scans, and biopsies) can lead to worsening symptoms which accelerate and expand testing. “Some of my patients are transferred to the ICU during the altered mental status work up,” states nurse Anita Misra. “The doctors seem to be very excited about the additional technology available to them in the intensive care setting. Between the central line placement, arterial blood gasses, and vast array of IV fluid and medication options, urosepsis is really an excellent entré into a whole new level of care.”

“As far as medicine-induced mental status changes are concerned,” added Dr. Fishbinder, “We’ve never seen a single case in the past 10 years. Today’s patients are incredibly resilient and can tolerate mixes of opioids, anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and benzodiazepines without any difficulty. We know this because most patients have been prescribed these cocktails and have been taking them for years.”

Patient family members have expressed gratitude for Dr. Fishbinder’s diagnostic process, and report that they are very pleased that he is doing everything in his power to “get to the bottom” of why their loved one isn’t as sharp as they used to be.

“I thought my mom was acting strange ever since she started taking stronger pain medicine for her arthritis,” says Nelly Hurtong, the daughter of one of Dr. Fishbinder’s inpatients. “But now I see that there are deeper reasons for her ‘altered mental status’ thanks to the brain MRI that showed some mild generalized atrophy.”

Hospital administrators praise Dr. Fishbinder as one of their top physicians. “He will do whatever it takes to figure out the true cause of patients’ cognitive impairments.” Says CEO, Daniel Griffiths. “And not only is that good medicine, it is great for our Press Ganey scores and our bottom line.”

As for the nursing staff, Griffiths offered a less glowing review. “It’s unfortunate that our nurses seem preoccupied with urine testing and medication reconciliation. I think it might be time for us to mandate further training to help them appreciate more of the medical nuances inherent in quality patient care.”

Dr. Fishbinder is in the process of creating a half-day seminar on ‘altered mental status in the inpatient setting,’ offering CME credits to physicians who enroll. Richmond Medical Hospital intends to sponsor Dr. Fishbinder’s course, and franchise it to other hospitals in the state, and ultimately nationally.

***

Click here for a musical take on over-testing.

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

Unaccountable: A Book About The Underbelly Of Hospital Care

I met Dr. Marty Makary over lunch at Founding Farmers restaurant in DC about three years ago. We had an animated conversation about hospital safety the potential contribution of checklists to reducing medical errors and his upcoming book about the need for more transparency in the healthcare system. Marty was…

Read more »

See all book reviews »