Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (9)

Vivek Kundra: Training Physicians To Use EMRs Is The Key To Adoption

I attended the 29th annual Management of Change (MOC) Conference with Dr. Val.  The conference is sponsored by the American Council for Technology and the Industry Advisory Council.  MOC brings together government and industry leaders to share knowledge, collaborate, and develop actionable technology management strategies.  As a physician, attending this conference for the first time, I assumed a great deal of the conference topics would be over my head and in very “techie” terms. My hope was to get a glimpse of some of the technology solutions the government was considering as they relate to health care IT.

Vivek Kundra, first Chief Information Officer of the United States, addressed the audience early in the day in language that even a doc could understand. He spoke about the need to simplify government, and connect people to solutions, instead of “endless bureaucracies.” The same of course goes for medicine. How great would it be to connect our patients to systems that actually had interoperable medical data?

I was able to catch up with Mr. Kundra after his talk for a few minutes and ask him how technological simplification would apply to physicians such as myself, operating in a haphazard infrastructure with varying PAC systems, EMR’s and paper charts. He said the key would not only be investing in technology, but investing in training healthcare personnel to master new technologies. He acknowledged that different generations of physicians would embrace technology differently, but ultimately, if a physician says he “can do a better job on paper” then we have a problem.

I was very impressed by Mr. Kundra’s answer namely because it was so insightful for a man who’s expertise lies primarily in the technology field. He does not come from a healthcare background, and yet had hit the nail on the head. There has been so much talk about HIT being the “key” to cost savings and the next “breakthrough” in medicine. With very little discussion on how physicians feel about it. For some docs – particularly those that come from an older generation – the thought is quite terrifying. They are happy with their paper charts and manual dictations. Health technology is almost viewed as an impediment to those set in their ways, and accustomed to a system that has worked for them and their patients for years. This upheaval will not come without it’s challenges even after we find the best technologies for the tasks at hand. It will be imperative for government leaders to understand that the mission of HIT implementation may be just as difficult as finding the technology solutions they are currently seeking.

As Mr. Kundra and his team embark on this huge task, it will be important for physicians and health care personnel to engage with the government and serve as a guide for what docs need from technology, and what will and will not work for our patients. I hope next year’s conference is attended by more physicians such as myself and Dr. Val.


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


9 Responses to “Vivek Kundra: Training Physicians To Use EMRs Is The Key To Adoption”

  1. Jay Bhatt says:

    Excellent piece. The point is certainly an important one considering health IT and having standards as well as everyone speaking the same language.

  2. Jamie P. Morano, MD, MPH says:

    Yes, indeed! Thanks, Geeta, for this great commentary.

    I just returned from a semi-annual business meeting of our local community hospital in Rockville, MD held on June 2, 2009; apparently federal stimulus package money is being generated to help this hospital system with HIT infrastructure. It would be important to know if these stimulus HIT investments are interoperable between each recipient? Let's hope the records will be accessible for more than the 6 months that are currently allowed with our current EMR system!

    For other HIT folks out there, can we somehow modify our VA system (or other privately owned systems such as Dartmouth-Hitchcock or Vanderbilt) that work very well and are already field-tested? From “Health Affairs”, HIT systems are currently being piloted by the US Government and in Massachusetts, but the key is making these financially feasible for hospitals and private practices. And you're right, if the HIT systems are subsidized, it will be crucial to make sure that the medical staff is both willing and able to document via these systems appropriately.

    A dream for me would be a free-access Google-like system of health office/hospital records based on the Outlook model (with VA-like security) in which physician practices could add/modify the system to their needs but also somehow be automatically updated by the government systems in terms of compliance with diagnostic codes and formularies!

  3. Monica says:

    A very interesting article. I personally feel that despite the challenges and the initial opposition, eventually the concept will have a good chance of getting mass acceptance, more so as recent generations of doctors are very computer savy. It will increase convenience, add accountability, create more order and easier sharing of information as with any other IT based solution.
    It would be exciting to watch as IT hits the health field.

  4. Dr. Neeta Venepalli says:

    Unless the government finds a way to reward physicians for switching to health technology instead of paper charting, it won't happen. This could be in the form of subsidies or tax refunds for clinics/hospitals or a reward system with regards to insurance costs. Otherwise, what incentive is there for doctors to switch to more expensive computer systems that require even MORE time to learn to use (for them and their staff), regardless of the ultimate payout? I welcome Mr. Kundra's suggestions on how to make the esoterics of HIT accessible, practical, and cost effective. Until then, paper charting is here to day.

  5. Jay Bhatt says:

    Excellent piece. The point is certainly an important one considering health IT and having standards as well as everyone speaking the same language.

  6. Jamie P. Morano, MD, MPH says:

    Yes, indeed! Thanks, Geeta, for this great commentary.

    I just returned from a semi-annual business meeting of our local community hospital in Rockville, MD held on June 2, 2009; apparently federal stimulus package money is being generated to help this hospital system with HIT infrastructure. It would be important to know if these stimulus HIT investments are interoperable between each recipient? Let's hope the records will be accessible for more than the 6 months that are currently allowed with our current EMR system!

    For other HIT folks out there, can we somehow modify our VA system (or other privately owned systems such as Dartmouth-Hitchcock or Vanderbilt) that work very well and are already field-tested? From “Health Affairs”, HIT systems are currently being piloted by the US Government and in Massachusetts, but the key is making these financially feasible for hospitals and private practices. And you're right, if the HIT systems are subsidized, it will be crucial to make sure that the medical staff is both willing and able to document via these systems appropriately.

    A dream for me would be a free-access Google-like system of health office/hospital records based on the Outlook model (with VA-like security) in which physician practices could add/modify the system to their needs but also somehow be automatically updated by the government systems in terms of compliance with diagnostic codes and formularies!

  7. Monica says:

    A very interesting article. I personally feel that despite the challenges and the initial opposition, eventually the concept will have a good chance of getting mass acceptance, more so as recent generations of doctors are very computer savy. It will increase convenience, add accountability, create more order and easier sharing of information as with any other IT based solution.
    It would be exciting to watch as IT hits the health field.

  8. Dr. Neeta Venepalli says:

    Unless the government finds a way to reward physicians for switching to health technology instead of paper charting, it won't happen. This could be in the form of subsidies or tax refunds for clinics/hospitals or a reward system with regards to insurance costs. Otherwise, what incentive is there for doctors to switch to more expensive computer systems that require even MORE time to learn to use (for them and their staff), regardless of the ultimate payout? I welcome Mr. Kundra's suggestions on how to make the esoterics of HIT accessible, practical, and cost effective. Until then, paper charting is here to day.

  9. Craig Gordon, MD MBA says:

    I agree health care IT COULD yield improvements in medical care (less medical errors, less duplicate testing, better information for physicians to act on) but health care IT is just in its infancy. Multiple problems exist including: health care IT that can accessed by community physicians, hospitals, and acamdemic centers; affordability; the fact that within healthcare there are multiple specialties, each with their own demands; the fact that the data needs to be entered in a fast, accurate, and yet detailed manner; and the fact that it is hard to template what physicians do. While I am an advocate of further research to developing and delivering health care IT, we should approach this process slowly, intelligently in order to work out bugs, ensure physician use and confidentiality, and to avoid huge IT mistakes that the government has a track record for (e.g. FBI database as just one example). In deed this effort should be led by private companies with the government assisting and consulting and ensuring confidentiality and common standards.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

How To Make Inpatient Medical Practice Fun Again: Try Locum Tenens Work

It s no secret that most physicians are unhappy with the way things are going in healthcare. Surveys report high levels of job dissatisfaction burn out and even suicide. In fact some believe that up to a third of the US physician work force is planning to leave the profession…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

Richmond, VA – In an effort to simplify inpatient medical billing, one area hospitalist group has determined that “altered mental status” (ICD-9 780.97) is the most efficient code for use in any patient work up.

“When you enter a hospital, you’re bound to have some kind of mental status change,” said Dr. Fishbinder, co-partner of Area Hospitalists, PLLC. “Whether it’s confusion about where your room is located in relationship to the visitor’s parking structure, frustration with being woken up every hour or two to check your vital signs, or just plain old fatigue from being sick, you are not thinking as clearly as before you were admitted. And that’s all the justification we need to order anything from drug and toxin screens, to blood cultures, brain MRIs, tagged red blood cell nuclear scans, or cardiac Holter monitoring. There really is no limit to what we can pursue with our tests.”

Common causes of mental status changes in the elderly include medicine-induced cognitive side effects, disorientation due to disruption in daily routines, age-related memory impairment, and urinary tract infections.

“The urinalysis is not a very exciting medical test,” stated Dr. Fishbinder. “It doesn’t matter that it’s cheap, fast, and most likely to provide an explanation for strange behavior in hospitalized patients. It’s really not as elegant as the testing involved in a chronic anemia or metabolic encephalopathy work up. I keep it in my back pocket in case all other tests are negative, including brain MRIs and PET scans.”

Nursing staff at Richmond Medical Hospital report that efforts to inform hospitalists about foul smelling urine have generally fallen on deaf ears. “I have tried to tell the hospitalists about cloudy or bloody urine that I see in patients who are undergoing extensive work ups for mental status changes,” reports nurse Sandy Anderson. “But they insist that ‘all urine smells bad’ and it’s really more of a red herring.”

Another nurse reports that delay in diagnosing urinary tract infections (while patients are scheduled for brain MRIs, nuclear scans, and biopsies) can lead to worsening symptoms which accelerate and expand testing. “Some of my patients are transferred to the ICU during the altered mental status work up,” states nurse Anita Misra. “The doctors seem to be very excited about the additional technology available to them in the intensive care setting. Between the central line placement, arterial blood gasses, and vast array of IV fluid and medication options, urosepsis is really an excellent entré into a whole new level of care.”

“As far as medicine-induced mental status changes are concerned,” added Dr. Fishbinder, “We’ve never seen a single case in the past 10 years. Today’s patients are incredibly resilient and can tolerate mixes of opioids, anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and benzodiazepines without any difficulty. We know this because most patients have been prescribed these cocktails and have been taking them for years.”

Patient family members have expressed gratitude for Dr. Fishbinder’s diagnostic process, and report that they are very pleased that he is doing everything in his power to “get to the bottom” of why their loved one isn’t as sharp as they used to be.

“I thought my mom was acting strange ever since she started taking stronger pain medicine for her arthritis,” says Nelly Hurtong, the daughter of one of Dr. Fishbinder’s inpatients. “But now I see that there are deeper reasons for her ‘altered mental status’ thanks to the brain MRI that showed some mild generalized atrophy.”

Hospital administrators praise Dr. Fishbinder as one of their top physicians. “He will do whatever it takes to figure out the true cause of patients’ cognitive impairments.” Says CEO, Daniel Griffiths. “And not only is that good medicine, it is great for our Press Ganey scores and our bottom line.”

As for the nursing staff, Griffiths offered a less glowing review. “It’s unfortunate that our nurses seem preoccupied with urine testing and medication reconciliation. I think it might be time for us to mandate further training to help them appreciate more of the medical nuances inherent in quality patient care.”

Dr. Fishbinder is in the process of creating a half-day seminar on ‘altered mental status in the inpatient setting,’ offering CME credits to physicians who enroll. Richmond Medical Hospital intends to sponsor Dr. Fishbinder’s course, and franchise it to other hospitals in the state, and ultimately nationally.

***

Click here for a musical take on over-testing.

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

Unaccountable: A Book About The Underbelly Of Hospital Care

I met Dr. Marty Makary over lunch at Founding Farmers restaurant in DC about three years ago. We had an animated conversation about hospital safety the potential contribution of checklists to reducing medical errors and his upcoming book about the need for more transparency in the healthcare system. Marty was…

Read more »

See all book reviews »