Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

Attempts To Reduce Re-Admissions To Hospitals May Not Be Worth It

Hospitals across the country are working on quality initiatives to reduce re-admissions to hospitals.  There are consultants, conferences, forums, meetings, physicians, nurses and administrators who are spending hours upon hours (and lots of $$$) to find ways to keep patients who have been discharged from being readmitted within 30 days.  Why all of this activity?  It is one of the quality measures that is being tracked by Medicare and Medical (CMS) and decreased reimbursement will be next if a patient is readmitted to any hospital within 30 days of a discharge. The diagnosis doesn’t matter.

A new study shows all of this focus and cost may not be worth it.  Readmission after a hospital discharge may not be an indication of poor care.

The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal looked at 4,812 patients and had medical experts review the cases of the 649 who needed urgent readmission within 6 months. (Not one month as we are measuring).  They found that avoidable readmissions were relatively uncommon.  Only 16% could have been prevented by better care, oversight or management of their condition.  And a tiny number of readmissions within 30 days, as we are tracking, were potentially avoidable.

This makes sense to me.  They found patients who were readmitted had more previous hospital admissions and more extensive health issues.  And the patients in this study were even younger than the typical Medicare patient.  No one wants to be in the hospital.  Doctors do not want to admit patients unless they are very, very ill.   Patients who have many medical problems like heart failure, strokes, liver failure, cancer, etc. tend to decline in health as time goes on.  All of the out-patient care and case management cannot always prevent declines.  The study points out that we might be measuring the wrong thing if we think it is a measure of medical quality.

They did find some urgent readmissions were avoidable.  But it didn’t vary by hospital ranking so either all hospitals are performing the same or it isn’t really a measure of quality.

Message to CMS:  Judgments about readmission cannot be determined on the basis of administrative data alone and it requires subjective judgement, detailed patient data, multiple reviewers and an analysis that accounts for differing reviewer accuracy when collating judgments.  This is a big waste of money.  Re-admission within 30 days (or 6 months) of discharge is not a marker of quality care.

*This blog post was originally published at EverythingHealth*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »