Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

Family Physicians: Are They Paid Well Compared To Other Docs?

Here’s an interesting article, talking about stuff that’s not new to anyone who has read my blog for the last three years. The current relative value unit (RVU) system is a scam, perpetuated by a super-secretive group of subspecialists each  inflating their own worth for the benefit of themselves, at the expense of primary care.

If you don’t understand what I’m talking about, first read about RVUs explained. Then come back and read this article put out by the National Institute for Health Care Management. It’s titled “Out of Whack: Pricing Distortions in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.“ In his essay, Dr. Robert Berenson shows how distorted primary care specialties are paid, relative to other specialties, in an all Medicare practice with the equivalent input of hours worked.

In addition to this graph, my other favorite quote from this article was:

MedPAC recently expressed renewed concern about basing the RVUs on estimates of work and practice expenses derived from specialty society surveys rather than using actual data from practices. For example, available data from operating room logs and appointment schedules demonstrate that service-specific time estimates provided by specialty societies are often inflated. MedPAC has urged CMS to consider ways to collect more objective data, and CMS recently sought public advice on how to do so.

This is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house. What did they think would happen? This article presents an  accurate reflection of the amount paid, by the Medicare National Bank, on a time based axis, for primary care services relative to other medical specialties. This data is a true reflection on the value of the work provided by primary care compared to other specialties. It’s what I have been saying all along. Evaluation and management (E/M) codes, the thinking codes, are vastly undervalued when compared to the procedural codes, on a time based axis, even with recent attempts to improve payment equality. It’s not even close yet. Pay more for procedures, get more procedures. Pay less for talking to patients, get less talking to patients.

This is not rocket science. Medicine does not operate under a magic economic force field. Physicians are not special. They respond to economic pressures just like the garbage man does, only they do it on a different level.

This data confirms the reason why only 2 percent of medical students enter an outpatient field of primary care. When comparing the ratio of average hourly earnings for specialties vs the primary care specialties, Dr. Berenson’s analysis shows that non-surgical, procedure oriented, surgical and radiology specialties earn around 2.1, 1.6 and 1.9 times the income, respectively, for the same hours of work. Is three years of additional training worth a doubling of value? It is for no other reason than because the RUC committee says it is.

The question of why anyone would go into primary care when they can earn two times the income for the same amount of time worked is easy to answer. They won’t. Fix RVU and you fix primary care. Unfortunately, this will never happen under the current rules, because fixing RVU would mean decimating the incomes of every other specialty.

The current exception is the hospitalist medicine movement which has left the constraints of the WIN-LOSE fixed mentality of SGR economics. Hospitals see incredible value in the work hospitalists provide, with a return on investment often running into the millions of dollars for every $100,000 in subsidy they provide. And that’s why hospitalists are the fastest growing medical physician specialty, while outpatient primary care is the fastest growing  nurse specialty.

*This blog post was originally published at The Happy Hospitalist*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »