Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

Coffee And Stroke: Another Study The Media Got Wrong

Here we go again. Headlines across America blaring lines like, “Coffee may reduce stroke risk.”

It was a big study, but an observational study. Not a trial. Not an experiment. And, as we say so many times on this website that you could almost join along with the chorus, observational studies have inherent limitations that should always be mentioned in stories. They can’t prove cause and effect. They can show a strong statistical association, but they can’t prove cause and effect. So you can’t prove benefit or risk reduction. And stories should say that.

USA Today, for example, did not explain that in its story. Nor did it include any of the limitations that were included in, for example, a HealthDay story, which stated:

“The problem with this type of study is that there are too many factors unaccounted for and association does not prove causality, said Dr. Larry B. Goldstein, director of the Duke Stroke Center at Duke University Medical Center.

“Subjects were asked about their past coffee consumption in a questionnaire and then followed over time. There is no way to know if they changed their behavior,” Goldstein said.

And, he noted, there was no control for medication use or other potential but unmeasured factors.

“The study is restricted to a Scandinavian population, and it is not clear, even if there is a relationship, that it would be present in more diverse populations. I think that it can be concluded, at least in this population, that there was not an increased risk of stroke among coffee drinkers,” he said.”

When you don’t explain the limitations of observational studies — and/or when you imply that cause and effect has been established — you lose credibility with some readers. And you should.

Note some of the comments left on the USA Today website:

• “Within a few weeks a new ‘study’ will come out telling us how bad coffee is for us.”

• “Sigh…I wish someone would make up their minds! Wasn’t it just a week or so ago there was a study about smog, coffee, etc., being bad for ya?”

• “Remember when ‘scientific’ studies were considered trustworthy and reliable? How can anyone tell the few pearls of knowledge in a world of pointless studies that flip-flop results and rehash incessantly?”

• “Drinking coffee reduces strokes per this study. Didn’t another say it causes cancer?”

USA Today wasn’t alone in being incomplete. WebMD was just plain inaccurate when it stated: “1 or More Cups of Coffee a Day Reduces Stroke Risk in Women.” The study didn’t prove that.

CBSNews.com had a simply silly story that led:

” Ladies, you knew there was a good reason for that double mochachino you have every morning — and maybe that one at lunch, too.”

At least they came back later and explained:

“As for your mochachino, no word yet on the benefits of whipped cream and chocolate sauce.”

But why even go there to begin with?

ABCNews.com, by comparison, emphasized this study showed “association, not causation.” Kudos to them.

For anyone — journalist or consumer — or researcher, for that matter — who doesn’t grasp the importance of using the correct language to describe observational studies, please see our primer on this topic.

*This blog post was originally published at Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview Blog*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »