Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (2)

Counter Point: A Nurse Who Wants A Single-Payer System

My apologies to James Carville. I plagiarized his tagline because the insurance industry has forgotten about sick people during our national healthcare debate.
I remember when nurses and insurance companies use to get along with each other. Back in the 1960s, these nurses even took time out of their busy schedules to pose for one of their ads. We took care of patients at the bedside, and the insurance companies paid the hospital bill. It was as simple as that, but then things started to change. It began with three little letters—HMO.


Insurance companies are spending a lot of time and money trying to scare people into opposing President Barack Obama’s ideas on health care reform. They are especially working hard to torpedo the public option plan. That plan would allow you to keep your own private health insurance policy or buy affordable health insurance through a public plan. Insurers are going all out to make you hate this idea by making claims that aren’t true. They are saying that the government is going to ration health care by dictating which doctor you can see, and by making you wait weeks to see a specialist. Ironic isn’t it? The insurance industry is already doing these things to patients everyday via their HMOs. We wouldn’t even be having this debate if they were playing fair in the first place.

Insurance companies make their money a couple of different ways. They rack in the bucks by not insuring people who are sick, a practice known as cherry picking, and by not paying out claims. They also make money by cutting out competition. This is the real reason why insurers are trying to muscle Uncle Sam out of the insurance business. Medicare administrative costs are equal to about 2 percent of what it pays out to providers. For private insurers the ratio over expenses to payments is typically over 15 percent. Why the big difference? Insurance companies have high overhead. Their CEOs take home mega-million dollar paychecks, they have to take care of their shareholders, and they have to pay for fancy ads that convince consumers that they will have health coverage when they really need it. They need those fancy ads. Insurance companies are always looking for ways to deny our claims, but I digress. Competition between private companies and a public plan would hit insurance companies right where it hurts—in their wallets. Fewer customers in private plans means less profits, and less profits, up to 20 to 30 percent by some estimates, means fewer martini lunches for those at the top of the corporate food chain. To make matters worse, those greedy folks who make money by NOT paying for care would have to lower their profit margin on the customers they do keep in order to compete with the government.

I’ll never forget the day that I learned about HMOs. I came into work and found red dots on the side of a few patient charts. My head nurse told me that the dots were put there to prompt doctors to discharge patients as soon as possible so that the hospital and the insurance company could make more money. That was twenty-five years ago and the system has been in freefall ever since. Year after year, nurses are voted as the most trusted profession in America in Gallup’s annual survey of professions for their honesty and ethical standards. We are patient advocates, and we never put anything above what’s best for our patients. That’s why I’m putting my seal of approval on President Obama’s public health insurance plan, and so are the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the SEIU. The insurance companies want your money. Nurses want to take care of their patients. We want all Americans to have affordable, high-quality healthcare.

*This blog post was originally published at Nurse Ratched's Place*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


2 Responses to “Counter Point: A Nurse Who Wants A Single-Payer System”

  1. Brandon says:

    I think the public health plan certainly has the potential to disrupt private health insurance company’s business model. However, it also has the potential to disrupt the entire health care industry.

    For example, Florida’s Medicaid denial rate is 39%; Medicaid New York sends 38% of claims back to providers the first time. Medicaid of New York takes 161 days to pay the average claim. Collectively, Medicaid days in A/R rose 21.7 % in 2008. On average, state Medicaid programs are paying doctors about twice as slowly as everyone else. That’s when it pays at all: Medicaid’s denial rate of 21.73 % is roughly three times the norm. (Source: http://budurl.com/p7um/d)

    Consider that a public health option could conceivably add 45 million people to our poorly managed, highly fragmented, inefficient public health care system.

    If a public health care option is managed anything like the Medicare and Medicare is managed today, the Obama administration will find little support from medical providers.

    @PediatricInc

  2. Brandon says:

    I think the public health plan certainly has the potential to disrupt private health insurance company’s business model. However, it also has the potential to disrupt the entire health care industry.

    For example, Florida’s Medicaid denial rate is 39%; Medicaid New York sends 38% of claims back to providers the first time. Medicaid of New York takes 161 days to pay the average claim. Collectively, Medicaid days in A/R rose 21.7 % in 2008. On average, state Medicaid programs are paying doctors about twice as slowly as everyone else. That’s when it pays at all: Medicaid’s denial rate of 21.73 % is roughly three times the norm. (Source: http://budurl.com/p7um/d)

    Consider that a public health option could conceivably add 45 million people to our poorly managed, highly fragmented, inefficient public health care system.

    If a public health care option is managed anything like the Medicare and Medicare is managed today, the Obama administration will find little support from medical providers.

    @PediatricInc

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »