Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

Free Throat, Head, Neck Cancer Screenings May Overstate Their Effectiveness

All over the country in May, hospitals are offering “Free Throat Cancer Screening.” A Google search turned up dozens of results for that specific term or the related “oral, head and neck cancer screening.”

Here’s one example, promoting “Oral, Head and Neck Cancer Awareness Week, May 8-14.”

This promotion uses ominous warnings:

Can you live without your voice?

What about your jaw?

Would you miss it if you couldn’t swallow food?

Throat cancer can take all of those things away, along with your ability to eat, talk and breathe normally. These debilitating problems can be prevented, but you have to catch cancer early.

Some promotions – such as this one – use celebrity pitches such as “If it happened to Michael Douglas, it can happen to you.”

Here’s one that states, “A 10-minute, painless screening could save your life.”

But where’s the evidence for that?

The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York states on its website:

Currently, there are no screening methods that have been proven to increase survival rates for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. A screening physical examination of the neck, oropharynx (the middle section of the throat that includes the soft palate, the base of the tongue, and the tonsils), and the mouth has been widely adopted as part of a routine dental examination. However, there is no evidence that this intervention reduces mortality from oral cancer. It is likely that in the coming decades this routine screening will allow earlier identification of oral cancer, when it is in a less advanced form, but this has yet to be proven in clinical studies.

There are no head and neck squamous cell carcinoma screening guidelines from the American Cancer Society, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), or the National Cancer Institute. And, at present, there are no known tests of blood or saliva proven to be effective for detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

In an email, American Cancer Society chief medical officer Dr. Otis Brawley wrote:

“We do not have any screening guideline on head and neck cancer screening. I am less concerned about simple visual and physical examination than say blood tests or x-ray screening tests in other diseases.”

But if you look at some of the web promotions of these screenings, you’ll see that most never mention what KIND of screening would be done. I think that’s important information for people to know. Brawley continued:

“I do think patients should not be given some false reassurance that a regular screening examination for head and neck cancer is known to save lives. There is no study that I am aware of to support that.

Rather than opportunistic screening, I would prefer that we encourage a head and neck exam be done when people go to the dentist and that we teach and encourage internists and family practice doctors to do it during routine physical examinations. Many MD’s are not comfortable with mouth pathology but are comfortable with palpation about the neck and throat.

We desperately do need to stress that people who notice a neck or throat mass get it evaluated and those who have a sore throat for more than a few days get is checked. This frequently does not happen and people frequently present with 8-month histories of a sore throat or change in voice.”

That sounds like reasonable advice.

We think these screening promotions would be better if they addressed:

• exactly what was going to be screened (there’s a lot of anatomy in the combined oral-throat-head-neck region) and how;

• is there any evidence that such screening saves lives?

• are there any American Cancer Society or US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on such screening? (You just read Brawley’s answer. The USPSTF states that “the evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routinely screening adults for oral cancer.”)

Readers of this blog know that we often comment on apparently well-intentioned but misleading or incomplete public messages about various screening tests.

It’s interesting that in a recent survey of users of our site, screening issues came up just twice – out of hundreds of responses.

One wrote: “tiring of the almost complete focus on screening.”

The other wrote: “I find the posts on ‘pre-disease’ and disease screening extremely important. I wish more people would pay attention to the issue of screening programs with no evidence to support a reduction in mortality.”

*This blog post was originally published at Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview Blog*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »