Last week I attended a press conference about healthcare reform at the National Press Club. The most interesting of the 4 speakers was Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute. In a recent editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Ms. Turner argued that,
The complex problems in our health sector are best cured by a bigger dose of market competition, not more government intervention.
I had the chance to interview Ms. Turner after her lecture.
Dr. Val: You’ve said that “we’ve got to come to a uniquely American solution to our healthcare crisis.” What does that mean?
Ms. Turner: I speak a lot in Europe, and they really believe that we have a permanent underclass of 47 million people who never have access to our healthcare system. They imagine that they’re bleeding in the streets. We know that’s not the case. Everyone has access to healthcare through emergency rooms – but this is an inferior way to access healthcare. People end up getting treatment at the end of an illness rather than the beginning when things could be better treated, and it’s much more expensive. We need to solve the problem of health insurance.
The movement of “consumerism” is something the world is looking to us to figure out. In other countries their concept of “innovation” is adopting diagnostic codes and payment structures for a system of treatment. We’ve had that for over 20 years in America. When we talk about innovations we mean new ways to respond to consumer needs. The fact that we don’t have so many rules and regulations guiding the entire structure of the healthcare experience means that we can innovate. We can create diversity of care options.
Most of the major research-based pharmaceutical innovations occur in America because we don’t have price controls and we don’t have restrictions on access to care. These are unique aspects of the American healthcare system, and even though Europeans criticize us, they’re always looking to learn from us.
Dr. Val: Why are “medical homes” important?
Ms. Turner: In this increasingly complex healthcare system, people need to have a place to go where their care will be coordinated. That may be a physician’s practice, but it can also be an electronic medical home where people have their medical records kept in one place, and where they have access to different specialists that they can use to coordinate their care. The medical home is really a beacon for more accurate, coordinated and more productive use of our healthcare system.
Dr. Val: You mentioned that there is a “workforce crisis” in our healthcare system — that there are not enough primary care phsyicians to meet demands. Yet you also said that If people could buy health insurance across state lines we could solve a lot of the access issues. How can both be true?
Ms. Turner: It’s a chicken and egg problem. We’ve got to increase access to health insurance. We can’t have 45 million people feeling that they’re blocked from predictable access to healthcare. Once you get tens of millions more people into the healthcare system, then you’re going to start to see a lot of pressure to better utilize the resources that are currently in the system. For example, people don’t always have to go to a doctor for something that a mid-level medical professional could provide them.
I predict that more people will begin to purchase high deductible insurance in case of major accidents or catastrophic events – but they’ll want more control over their routine access to the system, including convenient care clinics and complementary and alternative medicine. If we allowed cross-state health insurance purchasing, it would force the system to meet the needs of consumers for more affordable and convenient care.
Dr. Val: You said that increasing access to complementary and alternative medicine is about giving people “more choices.”
Ms. Turner: I’ve heard so many stories about people who were getting their care through their health insurance providers – guided through a predictable pattern of specialist care. And then when they swithched to a health savings account, they could access the system the way they wanted to. So many of our health issues are behavior-related, and it seems that alternative medicine practitioners can have success in helping people modify their behaviors. The more we have top-down regulatory prescription of what the system will pay for or not, the more you eliminate the alternative practices that might be very helpful to people. I’d like to see a lot more pluralism in our healthcare system, and expanding government intervention is not going to help us achieve that goal.
This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.