Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

Once You Have Lung Cancer, Should You Bother To Quit Smoking?

Most smokers dread lung cancer. They are aware that by continuing to smoke the chances of developing lung cancer are increased 20 times, and that once it has developed the treatment is unpleasant and prognosis poor. Many patients (and unfortunately many clinicians) assume that once you have lung cancer it is too late to quit.

This week a new report was published in the BMJ, based on a review of the evidence that smoking cessation after diagnosis of a primary lung tumour affects prognosis. The study, by Drs Parsons, Daley and Aveyard at the UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, combined the data from 10 studies. They found that those who quit smoking after diagnosis were significantly less likely to develop another tumor and significantly more likely to still be alive 5 years later. For example, it was estimated that among 65 year-old patients newly diagnosed with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who continue to smoke, 33% will survive for 5 more years, whereas for those who quit smoking, 70% will survive for at least 5 years.

There are a few pieces of information contained in this paper that are quite striking. The first is the proportion of patients who quit after lung cancer diagnosis. Of 1295 smokers newly diagnosed with lung cancer in this study, only 4640 (49%) quit smoking post diagnosis. If anything, that is likely to be an overestimate of the quit rate, as abstinence was generally based on self-report with no biochemical verification. It is remarkable that less than half of the smokers with lung cancer managed to quit.

The other amazing fact mentioned in the paper was that the authors could not find a single randomized controlled trial testing the effect of smoking cessation on prognostic outcomes in lung cancer. Billions of dollars have been spent on (largely fruitless) new drug development and evaluation for lung cancer, and in the past 50 years not one single cancer research center was funded to do a proper trial to find out whether tobacco dependence treatment improved clinical outcomes! Amazing.

But the good news from this study is that smoking cessation has relatively large clinical benefits even after lung cancer diagnosis.

I wonder what proportion of newly diagnosed smokers with early-stage lung cancer are provided with state-of-the-art smoking cessation treatment?

You can access the full research paper by Parsons and colleagues by cutting and pasting this link into your browser:

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jan21_1/b5569

This post, Once You Have Lung Cancer, Should You Bother To Quit Smoking?, was originally published on Healthine.com by Jonathan Foulds, Ph.D..


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »