Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (1)

Should Steroids Be Used To Treat Sore Throats?

RCentor has an interesting article on Sore Throats and Pharyngitis over at MedRants.  He writes:

There is a new trend in pharyngitis that has taken hold amongst emergency physicians – the use of steroids to provide symptom relief.

I too have noticed this, and I completely agree with Dr Centor that while this is a highly effective treatment, it needs to be used with some caution.  For our practice, this has been pushed by the ENTs.   It has been our experience that when we see someone with a really bad sore throat or even with a peritonsillar abscess, 100% of the time the instruction from the ENTs has been to administer steroids.  While the data is underwhelming (pain relief on average six hours quicker with steroids), the truth is that for a really bad case of tonsillitis, steroids work.

I’m not meaning the average case of strep, mind you, but rather the muffled-voice cases where the patient is so bad that they can’t take any fluids and you are worried about the integrity of their airway.  You give these cases a whopping dose of whatever steroid you like and BAM, like magic the tonsils shrink down and the patient feels a million times better. How can we ER docs — suckers for immediate gratification — possibly be expected to resist such a magical therapy?

Dr Centor worries about masking complications of pharyngitis (specifically his pet disease Lemierre’s); I worry more about masking the more common complications — like the peritonsillar abscess.  Let me recount a cautionary tale.  A couple of years ago, on an Wednesday evening shift, I saw a young man with a peritonsillar abscess.  It was pretty obvious on exam, but the patient looked OK.  A CT confirmed the presence of a small-to-medium sized abscess which would need to be drained surgically.  In our ER, this is usually done by the ENT surgeons — though we ER docs are trained to drain them, it’s just worked out that ENT has been deemed to “own” throat pus, the lucky duckys.

So I call the ENT and we reviewed the CT together. Unfortunately, he was unable to come in and do the procedure in a timely manner.  I forget why, maybe he was in a big case at the other hospital, but it was a legitimate reason.  So we agreed that since the patient looked good (meaning specifically his airway was in no jeopardy) that I would give him a dose of steroids and the ENT would drain it in the office first thing in the morning. Seemed reasonable. So I was surprised to see the patient back in the ER at 8AM on Friday with persistent and worsening symptoms.  He had not had the I&D of the abscess! I called the ENT guy, who explained that he had in fact seen the patient as planned, but the swelling in his throat had gone down so dramatically that he decided the drainage of the abscess was no longer necessary.  This is not as insane as it sounds.  It can be hard to really tell the difference between pus and a phlegmon on a CT scan, and while pus needs to see the light of day, a phlegmon will often resolve when treated with antibiotics and steroids.

But this was pretty clearly an abscess on the scan, so he should have drained it when he saw the patient. Ultimately it was a happy ending — the surgeon came in and took excellent care of the patient and he did fine.  But the point raised by Dr Centor is apt: in this case the surgeon deluded himself that the pus had gone away based on the steroid effect, and the patient wound up with a delayed operation.  This is a case, bear in mind, where the abscess had already been diagnosed.  What happens when the abscess is missed or not apparent on the initial presentation?  You treat with steroids, the patient shows initial improvement, and then gets worse again later.  While it’s true that peritonsillar abscess have a very low morbidity and mortality, it’s not zero.

If we start indiscriminately giving steroids to patients with pharyngitis, will we wind up seeing more abscesses or worse complications?  Or is it possible that steroid treatment will reduce the inflammation and resolve early phelgmons resulting in fewer abscesses?  I don’t know.  More research is needed, but it’s going to be difficult to get good data on this, given that the development of complications from exudative pharyngitis is an uncommon event, and even more uncommon to develop complications after the initial presentation.  It seems like all of my peritonsillar abscesses are diagnosed on the initial presentation — it’s rare to see someone with an abscess who had already been on antibiotics.

So how do I approach this?  I do give steroids for some cases of pharyngitis, but only bad cases where a) I am comfortable that there is no surgical pathology and b) the patient has excellent follow-up and is reliable or c) the patient is being admitted.  It’s a great tool, but one to be used with caution, in my view.And I’m gratified to see that Dr Centor agrees with me.  As he should.

*This blog post was originally published at Movin' Meat*

You may also like these posts

Read comments »

One Response to “Should Steroids Be Used To Treat Sore Throats?”

  1. michelle says:

    My son has had a sore throat for a week.It started on his left side. He has been given several antibiotic in pill and shot form. zithromax, bicillin, levaquin, rosefin and clindamycin. He could not tolerate the clindamycin it made his face and neck turn beet red. He has also hav a steroid shot and pills. We went to the er and that is when they gave him the bicillin and the zithromax. It has now spread to his right side and they are almost touching. We are at our wits end.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

How To Make Inpatient Medical Practice Fun Again: Try Locum Tenens Work

It s no secret that most physicians are unhappy with the way things are going in healthcare. Surveys report high levels of job dissatisfaction burn out and even suicide. In fact some believe that up to a third of the US physician work force is planning to leave the profession…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

Richmond, VA – In an effort to simplify inpatient medical billing, one area hospitalist group has determined that “altered mental status” (ICD-9 780.97) is the most efficient code for use in any patient work up.

“When you enter a hospital, you’re bound to have some kind of mental status change,” said Dr. Fishbinder, co-partner of Area Hospitalists, PLLC. “Whether it’s confusion about where your room is located in relationship to the visitor’s parking structure, frustration with being woken up every hour or two to check your vital signs, or just plain old fatigue from being sick, you are not thinking as clearly as before you were admitted. And that’s all the justification we need to order anything from drug and toxin screens, to blood cultures, brain MRIs, tagged red blood cell nuclear scans, or cardiac Holter monitoring. There really is no limit to what we can pursue with our tests.”

Common causes of mental status changes in the elderly include medicine-induced cognitive side effects, disorientation due to disruption in daily routines, age-related memory impairment, and urinary tract infections.

“The urinalysis is not a very exciting medical test,” stated Dr. Fishbinder. “It doesn’t matter that it’s cheap, fast, and most likely to provide an explanation for strange behavior in hospitalized patients. It’s really not as elegant as the testing involved in a chronic anemia or metabolic encephalopathy work up. I keep it in my back pocket in case all other tests are negative, including brain MRIs and PET scans.”

Nursing staff at Richmond Medical Hospital report that efforts to inform hospitalists about foul smelling urine have generally fallen on deaf ears. “I have tried to tell the hospitalists about cloudy or bloody urine that I see in patients who are undergoing extensive work ups for mental status changes,” reports nurse Sandy Anderson. “But they insist that ‘all urine smells bad’ and it’s really more of a red herring.”

Another nurse reports that delay in diagnosing urinary tract infections (while patients are scheduled for brain MRIs, nuclear scans, and biopsies) can lead to worsening symptoms which accelerate and expand testing. “Some of my patients are transferred to the ICU during the altered mental status work up,” states nurse Anita Misra. “The doctors seem to be very excited about the additional technology available to them in the intensive care setting. Between the central line placement, arterial blood gasses, and vast array of IV fluid and medication options, urosepsis is really an excellent entré into a whole new level of care.”

“As far as medicine-induced mental status changes are concerned,” added Dr. Fishbinder, “We’ve never seen a single case in the past 10 years. Today’s patients are incredibly resilient and can tolerate mixes of opioids, anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and benzodiazepines without any difficulty. We know this because most patients have been prescribed these cocktails and have been taking them for years.”

Patient family members have expressed gratitude for Dr. Fishbinder’s diagnostic process, and report that they are very pleased that he is doing everything in his power to “get to the bottom” of why their loved one isn’t as sharp as they used to be.

“I thought my mom was acting strange ever since she started taking stronger pain medicine for her arthritis,” says Nelly Hurtong, the daughter of one of Dr. Fishbinder’s inpatients. “But now I see that there are deeper reasons for her ‘altered mental status’ thanks to the brain MRI that showed some mild generalized atrophy.”

Hospital administrators praise Dr. Fishbinder as one of their top physicians. “He will do whatever it takes to figure out the true cause of patients’ cognitive impairments.” Says CEO, Daniel Griffiths. “And not only is that good medicine, it is great for our Press Ganey scores and our bottom line.”

As for the nursing staff, Griffiths offered a less glowing review. “It’s unfortunate that our nurses seem preoccupied with urine testing and medication reconciliation. I think it might be time for us to mandate further training to help them appreciate more of the medical nuances inherent in quality patient care.”

Dr. Fishbinder is in the process of creating a half-day seminar on ‘altered mental status in the inpatient setting,’ offering CME credits to physicians who enroll. Richmond Medical Hospital intends to sponsor Dr. Fishbinder’s course, and franchise it to other hospitals in the state, and ultimately nationally.


Click here for a musical take on over-testing.

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

Unaccountable: A Book About The Underbelly Of Hospital Care

I met Dr. Marty Makary over lunch at Founding Farmers restaurant in DC about three years ago. We had an animated conversation about hospital safety the potential contribution of checklists to reducing medical errors and his upcoming book about the need for more transparency in the healthcare system. Marty was…

Read more »

See all book reviews »