Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

The Features Of A Bundled Payment For Care Improvement Project

Many health care provider organizations have not been overly eager to jump onto the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) bandwagon, citing high startup costs and uncertain returns on investment given the complexity of the program.  Well, recently, the CMS Center for Innovation has announced the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement initiative.  This initiative incorporates elements of earlier CMS demonstration projects — the gainsharing demos and ACE (acute care episode) bundled payments demonstrations which the HealthBlawger has helped a number of clients around the country qualify for in the past — and builds on the broad authority granted to the CMS Center for Innovation under health reform.

The advantages to proceeding with a Bundled Payment for Care Improvement project include the opportunity to participate in CMS shared savings programs while only providing limited commitment of organizational resources, i.e., limited to one or more discrete service lines or episodes of care.  Of course, investments in a culture of collaboration must be made, but the system-wide investment in IT and other infrastructure at the level called for in order to qualify as an ACO would not necessarily be required in order to proceed with this initiative.

There are a number of different models open to participants, and nonbinding letters of commitment are due as early as late September.

From the CMS Center for Innovation announcement:

Applicants would propose the target price, which would be set by applying a discount to total costs for a similar episode of care as determined from historical data.  Participants in these models would be paid for their services under the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) system.  After the conclusion of the episode, the total payments would be compared with the target price.  Participating providers may then be able to share in those savings.

Applicants for these models would also decide whether to define the episode of care as the acute care hospital stay only (Model 1), the acute care hospital stay plus post-acute care associated with the stay (Model 2), or just the post-acute care, beginning with the initiation of post-acute care services after discharge from an acute inpatient stay (Model 3).  Under the fourth model, CMS would make a single, prospective bundled payment that would encompass all services furnished during an inpatient stay by the hospital, physicians and other practitioners.

The alignment of incentives that can occur under any one of these scenarios is, of course, greater than what obtains under traditional, fee-for-service Medicare.  Health care providers and patients alike may well benefit under this initiative, and it seems to me to make a great deal of sense for providers to jump into initiatives like this.  After all, a wholesale move away from fee-for-service medicine is likely inevitable, and is taking places in fits and starts like this at the federal level, and like the continuing Massachusetts health reform experiment (see also this post on Massachusetts global payments), to use one example at the state level.

Please feel free to contact me should you wish to arrange a consultation.  I have worked with a variety of folks in preparing for successful participation in CMS programs like this one in the past, and look forward to working with many more successful health care provider organizations to identify and implement the cultural and other changes necessary to be successful in this initiative, to select the most appropriate model to pursue, and to obtain any and all relevant CMS approvals.

*This blog post was originally published at HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog*

You may also like these posts

Read comments »

Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »