Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

The Slippery Slope Of Anti-Vaccine Complacency

I got a package in the mail today: My very own (complimentary) copy of Paul Offit’s new book, “Deadly Choices; How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All.” Needless to say, I can’t wait to read it. Not coincidentally, Dr. Offit has been making the rounds of interviews in the wake of the book’s release. Although I haven’t heard any of them directly, I did see a reference to this NPR interview on the FaceBook page of an old friend, who quoted from it thusly:

IRA FLATOW:  You write that some pediatricians will not see kids who are not vaccinated. Is that a good solution to the problem?

DR. PAUL OFFIT: I don’t know what’s a good solution to that problem. And I feel tremendous sympathy for the clinician who’s in private practice. On the one hand, and my wife sort of expressed this, she’s a general practitioner, a pediatrician, you know, she’ll say, you know, parents will come into her office and say I don’t want to get vaccines, including, for example, the Haemophilus influenzae vaccine, which is vaccine that prevents what was, at one point, a very common cause of bacterial meningitis.

And, you know, we’ve had three cases or three deaths, actually, from this particular bacterial form of meningitis in the Philadelphia area just in the last couple years.

And, you know, to her, it’s like, you know, let me love your child. Please don’t put me in a position where I have to practice substandard care, which can result in harm, which can hurt your child. Please don’t ask me to do that.

And I certainly understand the sentiment. On the other hand, if you don’t see that child, you know, where does that child go? Do they go to a chiropractor who doesn’t vaccinate?

I think it’s hard because then you lose any chance to really immunize the child.

My friend then offers his take, that of a pediatrician in private practice.

He says:

We never hear what the “other hand” is. I fear, for Offit, there is no other hand. Let me suggest what the other hand might be: Some pediatricians, such as yours truly, respect the right of parents to make informed decisions on behalf of their minor children. In the absence of a clear and present danger, such as an epidemic, neither I, nor the government for whom I work, can coerce parents into vaccinating if they don’t want to.

Oh, dear.

I, too, have families who are reluctant to vaccinate. No, I don’t dismiss them from my practice, because, as Offit says, then I lose any chance to educate them about the advantages of vaccination and the fallacy of their position. And my old friend is right: None of us can compel reluctant parents. But my responsibility it to their children — my patients! I must continue to make it clear to them that I do not agree with their decision not to vaccinate. Acceding to their demands without clearly communicating my reluctance to do so, what my friend calls “respecting the right of parents to make informed decisions on behalf of their minor children,” is abdicating that responsibility.

What if a family decided that they didn’t want to confine their baby in a car seat? The baby cries whenever they strap him into it, and besides, accidents are rare. They’ve done their research, and they feel the baby is safe enough in the mother’s arms. Would my friend be as sanguine about that decision?

What if parents did their own nutrition research and decided to put their toddler on a low fat strict vegan diet? As doctors, we are well aware that such a regimen would put that child at serious risk of significant malnutrition. Do we still have to “respect the right of parents to make informed decisions on behalf of their minor children” when they’re threatening to stunt their child’s growth? Wouldn’t we make every effort to educate them about more appropriate nutritional choices for their youngster? More importantly, would we ever stop trying to convince them they were wrong?

Where’s the line between “respecting the right of parents to make informed decisions for their minor children” and protecting the children from the consequences of their parents’ poor decisions? I submit that supporting parents’ bad decisions is a very bad decision in and of itself. Just as we can’t convince everyone to get a flu shot, we still have the responsibility to come right out and unequivocally recommend them.

Vaccination is important. Parents’ reluctance to immunize is generally based on flawed information. As physicians, it is our duty to educate our patients and their parents to help them make better decisions, not support their ignorance under the guise of “respect.”

*This blog post was originally published at Musings of a Dinosaur*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »