Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (2)

Warning: Graphic Health Politics

A friend sent me this interesting graph from the blog of the National Geographic.

You’ll have to click on it to see a bigger version.  It captures a lot of data very elegantly on a single graph–  Professor Tufte would love it.

What it shows is health care spending per person across a group of countries, along with life expectancies, average number of doctor visits per year, and whether a country has a system of universal health coverage.  Although putting all of this data on one graph is novel, the graph makes what by now is one of the oldest political arguments for reform – for all the money they United States spends on health care we don’t get a good deal.

So why blog about this graph?

Because it terrifically illustrates so many of the flawed assumptions about health care that have plagued the reform process.

Spending graph First, pretty much nothing correlates with anything.

Does spending more lead to longer life expectancies?  It doesn’t look like it – and it’s not just the United States.  Canada spends almost $4,000 per person but gets roughly the same life expectancy Spain which spends about 35% less.  Luxembourg spends one and half times as much as South Korea, but their life expectancies are the same.  Meanwhile, Austrians spend three times as much as Poles, and live longer, too.  Life expectancies do not appear to be a good metric for health care quality.

What about going to the doctor more often?  That doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, either.  Japanese seem to the doctor almost monthly, but live about as long as the Swiss, who go once a year.  Oh, and the Swiss still spend about 70% more than the Japanese on health care.  Australians and New Zealanders go to the doctor about as often as each other, but Australians live longer, and spend about a third more on health care.  It doesn’t seem like rates of doctor visits tell you much about health care quality, either.

So maybe there’s something about having a “universal health coverage provided by public and private insurers.”  Nope.  If  you live in Hungary you’re going to live a decade less than your fellow beneficiary of universal coverage in Sweden.  Even among the countries in the top chunk of life expectancy, their relative spending levels and rates of doctor visits are all over the place.

So what’s going on?

Americans are often criticized for being ignorant of the cultural differences between our country and others.  We are seen as either wrongly assuming that people from other countries think about the world just like we do, or, worse, that we aren’t as enlightened as people living in other countries.  This chart, from an American organization, is fascinating in that it combines seeming ignorance of differences among other countries with ignorance of the United States.

Here’s what I mean.  The division of the world into “red” and “blue” countries, based on the idea of “universal” coverage is simply false.  For example, like the countries themselves, the health care systems of Canada, Britain and Japan are very different from each other.  Yet this graph treats them as if they were essentially the same.

But it’s also incorrect about the United States.  It’s true that the United States doesn’t have a system of “universal coverage provided by public and private insurers,” but the “United States” is the wrong entity to look at.  Health care coverage is mainly a state, not federal question in America.  And if we look at the states, we see a different – and more complicated – picture.

For example, Massachusetts has a system of “universal coverage provided by public and private insurers.”  It enjoys a life expectancy at birth of  80.2 years.  Sounds like one of the “blue” countries.  But Massachusetts spends $7,000 per person per year on health care.  On this chart it would be a puzzling outlier.

Hawaii has an almost universal system, but spends far less than Massachusetts per person.  And yet it has the highest life expectancy in the country.  It, too, would be an outlier.    Meanwhile, “red” New York, where almost 15% of the population is uninsured, ranks sixth in the country in life expectancy and spends about $6,500 per person on health care.  Another outlier.

At a certain point, the existence of almost nothing but outliers ought to make you question your initial assumptions.

Not so with health care.   The story that the United States gets ripped off in its health care spending sticks because it is a convenient oversimplification.  It’s a catchy slogan to advance (or with other slogans, oppose) difficult to understand changes to a complex system.

But the problem with health care in America is we keep getting lured into assumptions that money is the right metric to measure the quality of medical care.  How much we spend, rather than whether patients are getting the right care.  Money, over medicine.

*This blog post was originally published at See First Blog*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


2 Responses to “Warning: Graphic Health Politics”

  1. hgstern says:

    Evan:

    This is simply OUTSTANDING. Perhaps the single best line I’ve ever heard in this whole debate (over the past 17 years): “At a certain point, the existence of almost nothing but outliers ought to make you question your initial assumptions.”

    Not. Toppable.

    Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.

  2. Evan Falchuk says:

    Thank you very much, Henry, I really appreciate that!

    Evan

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

How To Make Inpatient Medical Practice Fun Again: Try Locum Tenens Work

It s no secret that most physicians are unhappy with the way things are going in healthcare. Surveys report high levels of job dissatisfaction burn out and even suicide. In fact some believe that up to a third of the US physician work force is planning to leave the profession…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

Richmond, VA – In an effort to simplify inpatient medical billing, one area hospitalist group has determined that “altered mental status” (ICD-9 780.97) is the most efficient code for use in any patient work up.

“When you enter a hospital, you’re bound to have some kind of mental status change,” said Dr. Fishbinder, co-partner of Area Hospitalists, PLLC. “Whether it’s confusion about where your room is located in relationship to the visitor’s parking structure, frustration with being woken up every hour or two to check your vital signs, or just plain old fatigue from being sick, you are not thinking as clearly as before you were admitted. And that’s all the justification we need to order anything from drug and toxin screens, to blood cultures, brain MRIs, tagged red blood cell nuclear scans, or cardiac Holter monitoring. There really is no limit to what we can pursue with our tests.”

Common causes of mental status changes in the elderly include medicine-induced cognitive side effects, disorientation due to disruption in daily routines, age-related memory impairment, and urinary tract infections.

“The urinalysis is not a very exciting medical test,” stated Dr. Fishbinder. “It doesn’t matter that it’s cheap, fast, and most likely to provide an explanation for strange behavior in hospitalized patients. It’s really not as elegant as the testing involved in a chronic anemia or metabolic encephalopathy work up. I keep it in my back pocket in case all other tests are negative, including brain MRIs and PET scans.”

Nursing staff at Richmond Medical Hospital report that efforts to inform hospitalists about foul smelling urine have generally fallen on deaf ears. “I have tried to tell the hospitalists about cloudy or bloody urine that I see in patients who are undergoing extensive work ups for mental status changes,” reports nurse Sandy Anderson. “But they insist that ‘all urine smells bad’ and it’s really more of a red herring.”

Another nurse reports that delay in diagnosing urinary tract infections (while patients are scheduled for brain MRIs, nuclear scans, and biopsies) can lead to worsening symptoms which accelerate and expand testing. “Some of my patients are transferred to the ICU during the altered mental status work up,” states nurse Anita Misra. “The doctors seem to be very excited about the additional technology available to them in the intensive care setting. Between the central line placement, arterial blood gasses, and vast array of IV fluid and medication options, urosepsis is really an excellent entré into a whole new level of care.”

“As far as medicine-induced mental status changes are concerned,” added Dr. Fishbinder, “We’ve never seen a single case in the past 10 years. Today’s patients are incredibly resilient and can tolerate mixes of opioids, anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and benzodiazepines without any difficulty. We know this because most patients have been prescribed these cocktails and have been taking them for years.”

Patient family members have expressed gratitude for Dr. Fishbinder’s diagnostic process, and report that they are very pleased that he is doing everything in his power to “get to the bottom” of why their loved one isn’t as sharp as they used to be.

“I thought my mom was acting strange ever since she started taking stronger pain medicine for her arthritis,” says Nelly Hurtong, the daughter of one of Dr. Fishbinder’s inpatients. “But now I see that there are deeper reasons for her ‘altered mental status’ thanks to the brain MRI that showed some mild generalized atrophy.”

Hospital administrators praise Dr. Fishbinder as one of their top physicians. “He will do whatever it takes to figure out the true cause of patients’ cognitive impairments.” Says CEO, Daniel Griffiths. “And not only is that good medicine, it is great for our Press Ganey scores and our bottom line.”

As for the nursing staff, Griffiths offered a less glowing review. “It’s unfortunate that our nurses seem preoccupied with urine testing and medication reconciliation. I think it might be time for us to mandate further training to help them appreciate more of the medical nuances inherent in quality patient care.”

Dr. Fishbinder is in the process of creating a half-day seminar on ‘altered mental status in the inpatient setting,’ offering CME credits to physicians who enroll. Richmond Medical Hospital intends to sponsor Dr. Fishbinder’s course, and franchise it to other hospitals in the state, and ultimately nationally.

***

Click here for a musical take on over-testing.

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

Unaccountable: A Book About The Underbelly Of Hospital Care

I met Dr. Marty Makary over lunch at Founding Farmers restaurant in DC about three years ago. We had an animated conversation about hospital safety the potential contribution of checklists to reducing medical errors and his upcoming book about the need for more transparency in the healthcare system. Marty was…

Read more »

See all book reviews »