Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

When Physicians Fail To Take Responsibility For Their Own Orders

A physician asked me a question regarding what should be the role of hospitalists in carrying out discharge orders written by other physicians.

I have been following your blog since I was a resident and recommend it to a lot of people.  Thank you so much for enlightening me on so many day to day hospital issues.  I wanted to know your opinion about something that puzzles me.  When a specialist changes a medication or requires a lab to be done as outpatient after a discharge order is written (for example you write: okay to D/C if okay with cardiology, and they change a dose or request stress test out-pt) who is required to write the new scripts and arrange that test? Is it the hospitalist’s responsibility to do it? Or is the specialist who changed the dose after you rounded required to handle it? It was easier during residency due to abundance of residents/fellows and the fact it was electronic RX access. What are your thoughts? As so far I always return back and make the adjustments needed for the patient welfare, and the fact I don’t know whether I should take stance and request that physician to do their job.

Dear physician, there is nothing puzzling here.  It’s black and white.  The doctor who ordered the test is the doctor responsible for acting on its implementation and responding to the consequences of the result.   I have worked hard this year to try and change the culture of communication regarding critical lab values.   This is first and foremost a patient safety issue.  I have no business acting on objective data points requested by another physician because my action plan may be different than theirs.  This is especially true when I am cross covering dozens of patients and have limited knowledge about their day to day needs.

I am happy to report that Happy’s hospital nurses have done a phenomenal job of  appropriately communicating  critical objective results to the  appropriate ordering physician service. It turns out, a little education goes a long way for making things right. This educational initiative is more successful than I could have ever imagined.  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you for a job well done.  The difference does not go unnoticed on my end and my patients are getting orders from the appropriate service to manage critical patient care issues.  My  years of  playing  defacto first pager call for other physicians has ended for good.   Patient issues are being addressed by the physician service who requested the data.  And that’s the right way to care for patients.

Hopefully, this improvement will have staying power by being  systematically codified into the work flow  of doctor-nurse communication.  Hopefully, the first question any nurse asks themselves before calling  a physician is who needs to know, not who’s the easiest for me?

I know why communication interruptions had became so intolerable.   It’s called the convenience creep of being a hospitalist.  I’m sure most hospitalists would agree. The path of least resistance became the path of the hospitalist.   I believe  many doctors and nurses believed we were available for their convenience and could address patient needs on our time instead of theirs.   That’s not how I run my practice nor do I allow it for my patients.  I do not run a free skut service for other physicians.

I used to get called night and day with critical findings on studies ordered by other physician services.  It rarely happens any more.  When hospitalists cross cover 60-70 patients in a night, we  have no business fielding calls and addressing medical needs for orders initiated by other physician services.  That’s a patient safety issue.   I am quite happy addressing critical needs on my patients in a timely manner.  I am not willing to play first call pager for any other doctor on the case.

Convenience creep is not an acceptable hospital communication protocol.   On many levels, the most important of which is patient safety, physicians who order tests are responsible for handling the associated consequences.  If other services are difficult to contact, then that issue needs to be addressed as a patient safety issue in the medical staff process.  The solution is not to call the hospitalist. And a big thank you goes out to all the nurses and managers who have helped make this happen system wide.

So back to your original questions:  By providing that skut service to other doctors, for free, you are allowing yourself to be abused and placing your patients at risk for not receiving the care intended by the physician who did the ordering.  While patient safety is a priority, it is not your job to run a med mal protection operation for other doctors by  taking care of medical necessary orders being requested by another service.   If you don’t take a stand, you will be abused until no end and your patients may be at risk for not having the ordering physician complete their discharge needs.

I refuse to allow other physicians to excuse themselves from their responsibility on discharge.  Some nurses believe some doctors are too difficult to contact and believe hospitalists are just easier to complete the discharge process.  This is convenience creep.    That does not happen on my service because I refuse to allow it. This is bad medicine.

If you are having problems with your physician consultants not addressing orders they have implemented, simply write an order that states:

Contact ordering physician to clarify discharge medications and needs from their service.

If they  refuse to appropriately address discharge needs related to their care, they are abandoning their patient and you should file an incident  report with your medical staff services as this is a patient safety issue. Let the consequences work their way through the medical staff process.  If the medical staff chooses to do nothing, then it’s time to contact the Joint Commission or other governing bodies looking out for patient safety.  You might even contact your local news channel to let them know about your patient safety concerns.

Some doctors still view themselves above the process of being responsible for the orders they provide.  It’s unacceptable.  They should have their hospital credentials removed for being a hazard to patient safety.  When this attitude is attempted on my service, it is quashed immediately.    I do my job and do it well.   I don’t do others’ jobs for them, unless they want to pay me the same going rate they command to do the job they feel they are above.  I will gladly  fill out their home medications and prescriptions for a fee equal  to their average hourly compensation, payable in 3 minute increments, with a two hour minimum charge.

That, I don’t have a problem with.

*This blog post was originally published at The Happy Hospitalist*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »