Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (2)

When Should A Physician Help A Patient Die?

Here’s an interesting case.  A young woman drinks antifreeze to commit suicide, writes a note saying she does not want any medical treatment and calls an ambulance so she can die peacefully with the help of medical support.

I read a lot on  Happy Hospitalist about a patient’s right to demand what ever care they feel is necessary to keep them alive and the duty of the physician to provide whatever care the patient feels they require, no matter how costly or how miniscule the benefit.  Readers like to say it’s not a physician’s obligation to make quality of life decisions for the patient.

So let’s analyze this situation.  Does a  patient have the right to demand medical care and the services of physicians to let them die without pain?  Does a patient have the right to demand a physician order morphine and ativan to keep a depressed but physically intact patient comfortable as they slip away in a horrible antifreeze death under the care of medical personel?

If you think the doctors should have saved her despite her competent wishes to deny life saving therapy, should all depressed patients be declared incompetent and have their rights to make their own medical decisions revoked?

Fascinating conflicts of interest here.

A physician blogger Alexy Inciarte, the doc who alerted me to this story gave me his thoughts:

I think DNR or do not treat often applies for terminal desease, yet in terminal desease you often go for paliative care, rather than doing nothing, but I guess this is a rare case, a young healthy woman with no terminal desease, that wrote a letter declining any treament, but with a possible underlying mental condition (reactive depresion due to the imposibility of having a baby). Normally the patient has the right to decline for treatment, but there are exceptions to this rule, when the patient is not mentally capable, there is a physiatric condition that blurs the judgment, I dont know but, I feel this is a different history…. How can you be sure she wasnt metally influenced by depression?  If she was mentally influenced by drepession, not treating her, would be the right medical decision? even if she wrote a letter declining any treatment.  If the doctors treated her, could be they sued?  Could the doctors being sued by relatives for not treating her?

I wouldn’t try to save her, if I could verify her competency.  And providing comfort is certainly within the role of the medical community.  I would involve hospice services and transfer her to an out of hospital facility able to provide nonhospital services for end of life care.

What would you do as a nurse or doctor?

*This blog post was originally published at A Happy Hospitalist*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


2 Responses to “When Should A Physician Help A Patient Die?”

  1. drval says:

    I would try to save her because I couldn’t assess her competency. I might also suggest that attempted suicide (in a healthy young person) buys them an automatic “incompetent to make medical decisions.” Depression does not make someone incompetent to make medical decisions – unless those decisions are suicide/homicide. Then the person is more than depressed, they’re a potential threat to self/others and thus their wishes should be overruled.

  2. I spend a lot of time caring for suicidal patients. Most of them aren’t entirely serious, but we take them seriously. I can’t imagine looking at them and saying, ‘fine, go forth and die!’ Because most of them arrived because they told someone they were suicidal, or a loved one called EMS or police, or because they, themselves, called for help.

    When this becomes a stick wicket, we’re slipping towards trouble. Depression and life circumstances may lead one towards suicidality. But if we consider that normative, then we should simply dispense with antidepressants and commitments. We should just accept that some will kill themselves, and assume that it is always a rational, well-considered decision. It sure will make my life easier! But…

    What if it’s my son or daughter? My wife or father? Do I simply say, ‘well, they’re tired of it all?’ Should I accept that a physician elected not to intervene, out of respect for the wishes of my suicidal child, who needed therapy and hope more than antifreeze?

    I guess the question is one of fundamental worth. As we gradually move towards an ethic that considers human health-care an economic burden on money otherwise used for meaningful progress or entertainment; as long as we consider humans an environmental hazard and plague on the planet; as long as we think of humans as having no intrinsic value, then we can just start letting them die at will.

    But if so, let’s inaugurate a new profession: thanatology, or mortology, a profession whose work is death. Day in, day out providing the death so desired by the rational masses. Just don’t as me to do it.

    I have a hard enough time with saving lives.

    Edwin

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »