Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments (2)

Why Do Patients Stop Taking Their Medications?

Lots of smart people over the years have been trying to figure out why people stop taking their medications within the first 12 months.  Within the first 12-months of starting a new prescription, patient compliance rates drop to less than 50%.  This rate is even lower for people with multiple chronic conditions taking one or more prescription medications.

If these medications are so important to patients, why do they just stop taking them? It defies common sense. Sure issues like medication cost, forgetfulness, lack of symptoms, and psychosocial issues like depression play a role in patient non-compliance. But there also something else going on…or in this case not going on.

The problem is that doctors and patients simply don’t talk much about new medications once prescribed. Here’s what I mean.  Let’s say that at a routine check-up a physician tells a patient that he/she wants to put them on a medication to help them control their cholesterol.  The doctor spends about 50 seconds telling the patient about the medication.  The patient nods their head takes the prescription and boom…the visit is over.

Let’s say the patient actually gets the prescription filled.  For some people that is a leap of faith considering the likely chain of events up to that moment:

  • The physician didn’t really make a good case for why they needed the medication (if the doctor wanted me to take it he/she should have been emphatic about it as in “I recommend you take this” – not simple “I want to try something”), what it would do or what would happen if the patient didn’t take it.
  • The doctor didn’t mention how the new medication would interact with the 2 other pills I am already taking.
  • Consequentially the patient may not believe they really need the medication.

Fast forward 12 months. The patient has been back to see the same doctor twice for problem unrelated to cholesterol. At neither of these appointments did the doctor mentioned or ask how the patient was doing with the new medication. The doctor did mention the need for a blood test to check for liver issues and that they should recheck the cholesterol levels at the next visit.

So at this point the patient concludes the following about the new medication:

  • The doctor never talks about cholesterol or brings up the subject of the medication. I assume I am taking it correctly.
  • If the doctor doesn’t mention it (the medication) it must not be important.
  • I haven’t notice any difference in my health – I guess I don’t need the medication.

Sure the patient should have asked their doctor if they had any questions about the new medication. But patients seldom ask their doctor questions. Sure they could ask the pharmacist…but the pharmacist would tell them to just ask their doctor.

It so much easier for the patient to just not refill the prescription.

We have all heard the expression that whatever doesn’t get measured doesn’t get done.  Well the same thing is true for when it comes to physician-patient communications.  Whatever issues doctors don’t talk with patients about will not get done over the long haul either.  In this case patient’s simply stop taking prescribed medications.

As primary care slowly shifts from episodic, acute care to continuous care with the aid of EMRs and the focus of patient-centered care things should get better with respect to patient compliance. It needs to. Give the current focus on episodic acute care too many chronic health issues simply are not being addressed for one visit to the next.

That’s what I think. What’s your opinion?

*This blog post was originally published at Mind The Gap*


You may also like these posts

Read comments »


2 Responses to “Why Do Patients Stop Taking Their Medications?”

  1. ClinicalPosters.com says:

    Good thoughts. Another reason: unpleasant side effects. Granted, there should be communication when this is the case. But if, according to your article, the physician delays inquiry about the regimen 12+ months, the patient, by then, may have self-adjusted to the unpleasantness — reducing dosage or discontinuing. Imagine the shock when the doctor asks a year later, “Are you still taking your meds?” and discovers the patient stopped taking them within 2 weeks or that the prescription copayment was too expensive so it was never obtained.

    You briefly mentioned that lack of symptoms is another factor. Communicating that there is a chance that patient will feel X or Y, and if he feels other symptoms to contact the physician is more reassuring. Some meds have a specific purpose for a limited time; others require lifelong compliance. Sometimes the distinction isn’t made for the patient or lifelong compliance is assumed too early. Specifying a realistic timeline for reevaluation is important.

  2. John Ryan says:

    Ho-hum. Another post in a long series of self-flagellating articles about physicians by health care bloggers, excusing patients from responsibilities for their health. Really, the writer should know better.

    The same mid level business manager responsible for dozens of employees and millions of dollars of corporate assets decides he doesn’t need his cholesterol med as his doctor hands him a prescription, because the doc doesn’t beg him to fill it. A 75 year old retiree remembers to file his taxes annually and make his car loan payment, but decides he doesn’t need to refill his BP meds (when called by the pharmacy), because his doctor didn’t specifically mention the refill at the last visit when remarking on his good BP control. Even more common, a patient is convinced by a friend (working for a well known vitamin seller) to drop a prescription med, use a homeopathic remedy, and never lets the doctor know.

    Let’s stop fooling ourselves on who is playing games here. I have no problem holding patients to a level of responsibility and maturity that the rest of society expects of them.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

How To Make Inpatient Medical Practice Fun Again: Try Locum Tenens Work

It s no secret that most physicians are unhappy with the way things are going in healthcare. Surveys report high levels of job dissatisfaction burn out and even suicide. In fact some believe that up to a third of the US physician work force is planning to leave the profession…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

Richmond, VA – In an effort to simplify inpatient medical billing, one area hospitalist group has determined that “altered mental status” (ICD-9 780.97) is the most efficient code for use in any patient work up.

“When you enter a hospital, you’re bound to have some kind of mental status change,” said Dr. Fishbinder, co-partner of Area Hospitalists, PLLC. “Whether it’s confusion about where your room is located in relationship to the visitor’s parking structure, frustration with being woken up every hour or two to check your vital signs, or just plain old fatigue from being sick, you are not thinking as clearly as before you were admitted. And that’s all the justification we need to order anything from drug and toxin screens, to blood cultures, brain MRIs, tagged red blood cell nuclear scans, or cardiac Holter monitoring. There really is no limit to what we can pursue with our tests.”

Common causes of mental status changes in the elderly include medicine-induced cognitive side effects, disorientation due to disruption in daily routines, age-related memory impairment, and urinary tract infections.

“The urinalysis is not a very exciting medical test,” stated Dr. Fishbinder. “It doesn’t matter that it’s cheap, fast, and most likely to provide an explanation for strange behavior in hospitalized patients. It’s really not as elegant as the testing involved in a chronic anemia or metabolic encephalopathy work up. I keep it in my back pocket in case all other tests are negative, including brain MRIs and PET scans.”

Nursing staff at Richmond Medical Hospital report that efforts to inform hospitalists about foul smelling urine have generally fallen on deaf ears. “I have tried to tell the hospitalists about cloudy or bloody urine that I see in patients who are undergoing extensive work ups for mental status changes,” reports nurse Sandy Anderson. “But they insist that ‘all urine smells bad’ and it’s really more of a red herring.”

Another nurse reports that delay in diagnosing urinary tract infections (while patients are scheduled for brain MRIs, nuclear scans, and biopsies) can lead to worsening symptoms which accelerate and expand testing. “Some of my patients are transferred to the ICU during the altered mental status work up,” states nurse Anita Misra. “The doctors seem to be very excited about the additional technology available to them in the intensive care setting. Between the central line placement, arterial blood gasses, and vast array of IV fluid and medication options, urosepsis is really an excellent entré into a whole new level of care.”

“As far as medicine-induced mental status changes are concerned,” added Dr. Fishbinder, “We’ve never seen a single case in the past 10 years. Today’s patients are incredibly resilient and can tolerate mixes of opioids, anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and benzodiazepines without any difficulty. We know this because most patients have been prescribed these cocktails and have been taking them for years.”

Patient family members have expressed gratitude for Dr. Fishbinder’s diagnostic process, and report that they are very pleased that he is doing everything in his power to “get to the bottom” of why their loved one isn’t as sharp as they used to be.

“I thought my mom was acting strange ever since she started taking stronger pain medicine for her arthritis,” says Nelly Hurtong, the daughter of one of Dr. Fishbinder’s inpatients. “But now I see that there are deeper reasons for her ‘altered mental status’ thanks to the brain MRI that showed some mild generalized atrophy.”

Hospital administrators praise Dr. Fishbinder as one of their top physicians. “He will do whatever it takes to figure out the true cause of patients’ cognitive impairments.” Says CEO, Daniel Griffiths. “And not only is that good medicine, it is great for our Press Ganey scores and our bottom line.”

As for the nursing staff, Griffiths offered a less glowing review. “It’s unfortunate that our nurses seem preoccupied with urine testing and medication reconciliation. I think it might be time for us to mandate further training to help them appreciate more of the medical nuances inherent in quality patient care.”

Dr. Fishbinder is in the process of creating a half-day seminar on ‘altered mental status in the inpatient setting,’ offering CME credits to physicians who enroll. Richmond Medical Hospital intends to sponsor Dr. Fishbinder’s course, and franchise it to other hospitals in the state, and ultimately nationally.

***

Click here for a musical take on over-testing.

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

Unaccountable: A Book About The Underbelly Of Hospital Care

I met Dr. Marty Makary over lunch at Founding Farmers restaurant in DC about three years ago. We had an animated conversation about hospital safety the potential contribution of checklists to reducing medical errors and his upcoming book about the need for more transparency in the healthcare system. Marty was…

Read more »

See all book reviews »