Better Health: Smart Health Commentary Better Health (TM): smart health commentary

Article Comments

A Scientist Warns Against Some Forms Of Collaboration

Yesterday I went to go see my friend, the recently infrequently-mentioned Dr. Buttercup. When I first came to MRU, Dr. Buttercup was gracious enough to allow me to share lab space with him. That, coupled with our mutual love of beer and cake, meant that we saw each other quite frequently. Now that I have moved into other laboratory digs and find myself full of people, I see less of Dr. Buttercup and am the recipient of far less of his wisdom. It’s a shame. I miss that dude.

Then again, as soon as that guy received a grant score that someone told him was “fundable”, he became insufferable. Show off.

But, I digress. I saw Dr. Buttercup yesterday about a different matter and we got to discussing the idea of collaboration. He shared the notion that, as an Assistant Professor, collaboration is one of the funnest things he does. It’s also potentially one of the most dangerous because it robs your time without real reward. Still, brainstorming new experiments is fun and sometimes that additional effort on someone else’s grant pays the bills.

This made me think that the same is true for postdoc-level scientists and made me think about some collaborations I got myself into once upon a time. You see, when you’re a newly-minted, grown-up scientist, you’re on top of the world. Perhaps you start to feel like an expert in something and, perhaps, you’re enthusiastic to show the folks around you how good you are at what you do.

Don’t do it. Generally, you should resist the urge to merge (your data with others).

Personally, I have experienced two types of collaboration. The first type of collaboration I once got myself into was for a large clinical study. I had performed all the techniques they were using in my own previous work, but I have a particular clinical skill and was asked to perform this clinical skill for the patients in the study. Or, should I say, I was volunteered to perform this skill.

Figure 1: Dr. Isis, hard at work, doing that thing she does.

I agreed, but getting sucked in to this could not have sucked more. I contributed very little intellectually to the study, beyond the initial design related to my area of expertise, and it took a huge amount of time. I did the same thing every time on every patient and I learned very little from the experience. This type of collaboration should be avoided at all cost. What do you get at the end of it? Some second author nonsense-ery that no one really cares about. And a sore wrist and swollen ankles.

One of the other collaborations I found myself involved in once upon a time was with a scientist who does something completely tangential to what I do. He was looking to apply some of the things I do to his line of work and asked me to help build a set-up similar to what I was using. This ended up being a great collaboration. I spent a few meetings helping with the study design. I then spent a couple of days ordering things and setting things up. And then I was asked intermittently to help troubleshoot issues, answer questions, or review data. My role was much more like a consultant. This was a better collaboration, largely because it required minimal daily investment on my part and it was with someone who could teach me something novel. I really benefited from our interaction and he became someone I could discuss my ideas with. So, although collaborations at this professional level should generally be avoided, you might reconsider if 1) the time commitment on your end is minimal and 2) the collaboration has mutual benefit.

But, even then, largely avoid them and keep your eye on the prize. No matter how cool you think your new tricks are and how many people you want to impress.

*This blog post was originally published at On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess*

You may also like these posts

    None Found

Read comments »

Comments are closed.

Return to article »

Latest Interviews

IDEA Labs: Medical Students Take The Lead In Healthcare Innovation

It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…

Read more »

How To Be A Successful Patient: Young Doctors Offer Some Advice

I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…

Read more »

See all interviews »

Latest Cartoon

See all cartoons »

Latest Book Reviews

Book Review: Is Empathy Learned By Faking It Till It’s Real?

I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…

Read more »

The Spirit Of The Place: Samuel Shem’s New Book May Depress You

When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…

Read more »

Eat To Save Your Life: Another Half-True Diet Book

I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…

Read more »

See all book reviews »

Commented - Most Popular Articles