October 6th, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in News
3 Comments »
Have you ever been singled out in a lecture and picked on? Or maybe at a comedy club? It’s somehow awkward when everyone is looking at you, and you can’t really defend yourself. That happened to me yesterday in a lecture about how email can transform medical practices. My friend Joe Scherger was talking about the beauty of asynchronous communication, and how much time it saves – when out of the blue, he said that Blackberries defeated the whole purpose of emailing, and that people who used them lead unbalanced lives. He then pointed at me and said, “See my friend Val Jones, there? She uses a Blackberry all the time!”
All eyes fixed on me with a sort of half pity, half “tisk, tisk” expression.
“She answers all her emails within minutes… She never unplugs.”
I shrugged and smiled sheepishly. Soon the conversation turned to other subjects, and I resisted the urge to pull my Blackberry out of my bag to check my emails.
Today I heard that Intel instituted email-free Fridays as a means to force their engineers to talk to others face-to-face. Apparently, the company was worried that interpersonal skills were being lost, and that people were not developing normal working relationships because of the artificial distance created by email-only communication.
“Well, at least I’m not alone,” I thought as I read the news story. “This is a serious problem across the country.”
There has been recent debate in the psychiatric community about whether or not video games could be considered an addiction (just as drugs and alcohol can be). Some have proposed that it be added to the DSM-V due out in 2012, others have said that compulsive video game playing is a sign of other underlying pathology (such as depression or social anxiety) but not a true addiction.
But the bottom line is that overuse of the Internet can disrupt a person’s time available for meaningful interpersonal relationships, be they with a spouse, a parent, a relative, or a friend. When your husband is sitting in the same room with you and has to get your attention by IM-ing or emailing you, you know there’s a problem.
And there doesn’t seem to be much of a break in sight – with Facebook, MySpace, Linked-In, YouTube, Pownce, Twitter, GTalk, blogs, podcasts, discussion boards, chat rooms, forums, etc. available as 24-7 forms of entertainment and communication, and companies like Intel trying to forbid this kind of stuff at least 1 day per week, Blackberries are the least of our worries. I wonder if these programs are like junk food for the brain? Will we soon suffer from cerebral obesity?
I’m afraid that I recognize that there is a problem, but I’m not sure what the solution is. “Just say no” to email doesn’t work for me… I like the fast-paced interactivity and connection I get from these activities. Maybe there’s a positive feedback loop at work, though – we spend a lot of time involved in online activities and become more isolated and lonely in our personal lives. In the end we become more and more engaged with the Internet to fill the emotional gap that we’re actually creating by overusing it.
I’ll ask my husband what he thinks… perhaps I’ll send him an email about it tonight.
What do you think?This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
September 7th, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in Expert Interviews
2 Comments »
Two new studies reported increasing suicide rates in teenagers. The first noted a trend between decreased use of anti-depressant medications (SSRIs) in teens and an increase in suicide, the second reported an increase in female teen suicide in particular.
What could be causing these tragic increases? I interviewed Revolution Health psychologist, Dr. Mark Smaller and child psychiatrist, Dr. Andrew Gerber, to get their take on this disturbing trend.
1. In previous research,
increased suicidality was associated with SSRI use in teens. Now this study
suggests that lower SSRI use is associated with increased suicidality. How do
you explain this?
Dr. Smaller: Following the previous research, parents and some physicians cut back on SSRI use for depressed teens. However, in doing so they may have neglected those teenagers who could have benefitted from an antidepressant. The problem with these medications is that they effect so many parts of the brain that it’s difficult to predict how different patients will respond to them. Also, these medications are often prescribed in too high a dosage. What needs to happen is that the patient, teen, child, or adult must have a full psychosocial evaluation that takes into account the whole person, and the environment in which he or she is living. A clear treatment plan combining talking therapy (individual or family) and perhaps medication must be implemented. This is not being done in enough instances. With a proper evaluation and a carefully designed treatment plan (as well as close monitoring of the teen) therapy may be further customized to the individual.
Dr. Gerber: The possibility of an association between suicidality and SSRI use in children
and adolescents is of clear concern to many people, including all psychiatrists
and parents of children on medication. Despite all the accumulated research to
date, it is still very unclear how this association works. However, we do know a
few important things.
First, in all the studies of SSRI use in children, there
is no report of a completed suicide attempt in a child who was taking an SSRI.
This goes to show that completed suicides in children, while tragedies whenever
they do happen, are rare events and therefore very hard to study methodically.
Second, in those studies that have shown a possible association of suicidal
thoughts (though not actual suicides) with SSRIs, there is a lot of disagreement
and controversy over how to best measure these thoughts in an accurate way. How
one does this influences the results considerably.
Third, it is important to
keep in mind all the ways in which an association between SSRIs and suicidal
thoughts may appear to exist because of how the data are collected, even if SSRIs
really don’t bring about suicidality at all. For example, it’s certainly true
that doctors are most likely to give medications to the kids who are the most
depressed and the kids who are the most depressed are most likely to be
suicidal. So it might look like SSRIs are related to suicidality, when they are
really being used to treat those kids who are most likely to develop it.
The
best way to really tease these apart is to randomly assign enough children
either to SSRIs or non-SSRI treatment and then observe what the differences are.
The problem, is that (1) the data are so good that SSRIs help many kids with
depression that it would be unethical to withhold treatment from half the
children in order to complete such a study, and (2) suicidality is rare enough
that this study would have to be enormous, and thus is impossible to
do.
With all this said, it is not surprising at all that an overall
decrease in the use of SSRIs, most likely due to the greater caution that
clinicians now have in using these medications in children, would lead to more
suicidality on a broader scale. We know that SSRIs help most children who take
them and this is undoubtedly a more powerful effect than any extent to which
SSRIs cause suicidality (if this is true at all).
2. Is there a role for
SSRIs in teens?
Dr. Smaller: I think so but only after a full diagnostic evaluation is made by a skilled mental health professional who works with teens, family and is familiar with the developmental phase of adolescence.
Dr. Gerber: There is unquestionably still a role for SSRIs in teens as long as they are
monitored carefully by a well trained clinician who, following agreed upon
guidelines, has decided that an SSRI is the right treatment for this teen. Of
course, as always, other treatments and their advantages and disadvantages
should be considered too. But for the best interests of kids and teens, SSRIs
need to remain a possibility.
3. What would you counsel
parents about these drugs?
Dr. Smaller: Get a full physchological evaluation and treatment plan so that you can make an informed decision about what might help. The mental health professional and the parent must have a working alliance to insure that the treatment is successful.
Dr. Gerber: I would advise parents that it is always good for them to be well informed and
vigilant about the risks and benefits of all treatment that they consider for
their children. There is much that we do not know about child psychiatric
illness and we are working furiously to learn more. In the meantime, though we
have to be careful to keep an open mind to both sides and to not make premature
judgments either in favor or against any one treatment. SSRIs have shown
themselves to be useful with many children and, in the hands of a well trained
professional, can continue to be very helpful to the right children and their
families.
4. What do you make of
the suicide rate increase in girls? What could be behind
this?
Dr. Smaller: This is alarming. The onset of adolescence for girls and boys is a hugely disruptive developmental phase, and maybe more so for girls with the onset of puberty. The teen years can be fraught with family issues that exacerbate moods and create symptoms. Our culture puts huge demands on all of our adolescents and this research might be showing that it is taking a high toll on girls. Social roles, peer pressure and issues, academic demands and family strife all contribute. The high incidence of eating disorders among teenage girls is a clear example of a symptom to which many teenage girls are vulnerable.
Dr. Gerber: The greater increase in suicide rates among teenage girls is surprising and
experts are unsure of how to interpret this. Since the overall number of
suicides is small – 94 in 2003 and 56 in 2004 – it is hard to interpret what was
different in this group of teenage girls. There are so many increasing pressures
on teenage girls today – from issues around body image and weight to balancing
complicated societal expectations, what some experts term pressure to live up to
a “superwoman ideal” – that one might speculate it is leading more and more
teenage girls to feel overwhelmed and hopeless. However, what we really need, as
with the SSRI controversy, is more carefully collected data and thoughtful
discussions between families, patients, and clinicians, to understand what is
happening and how we can prevent it.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
August 24th, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in Opinion
1 Comment »
A new study in the American Journal of Public Health reports that teens can expect a 50% reduced risk of developing chlamydia and gonorrhea if they use condoms from their very first sexual experience. Starting to use condoms later on can certainly protect against disease – but it seems that there is something important about using them from the beginning. In other words, people who use condoms from day 1 are more likely to keep using them regularly, and are therefore less likely to contract sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
I could enter into some awkward speculation about why this is true (maybe it’s easier to get used to the sensation of wearing a condom if it’s all you’ve ever known? Maybe using condoms from the start is more likely to make it a habit?) but more importantly, a 50% reduction in sexually transmitted infections is an incredibly huge margin of success. Sadly, sex education programs for youth have had mixed success in increasing consistent condom use. This study seems to suggest that for those students who receive the message, and use condoms from their first experience, there is a much greater chance of avoiding STIs. Early sex education, therefore, may have more benefit than sex education offered after an adolescent is sexually active.
Of course, like Dr. Stryer, I feel a bit concerned about over-exposing elementary school kids to sexual messaging. But since kids are already exposed via TV, the Internet, and various other media, it behooves us to arm them with age-appropriate information at the earliest point possible. Abstinence is the only 100% guarantee of an STI-free adolescence – but since ~50% of teens are sexually active (regardless of beliefs, sex education, or parental controls) it might be best to teach them that condoms are an inextricable part of all sexual intercourse. Sexually transmitted diseases can mean the difference between fertility and infertility, long life, or earlier death for our kids. With stakes this high, consistent condom use should be our mantra.
This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
August 22nd, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in True Stories
1 Comment »
Dr. Sid Schwab recently wrote a wonderful blog post about what doctors feel when they treat patients who remind them of their own kids. For example, he describes how it makes the physician want to run home and hug his/her kids out of gratitude that they’re ok. His post reminded me of an experience I had in the pediatric Emergency Department where I came face to face with memories of my own childhood trauma.
I was bitten in the face by a neighbor’s dog when I was about 4 years old. It was unprovoked and completely unexpected. The dog had no history of viciousness and I had no history of tormenting the creature. I was standing in the hallway, eye to eye with the dog (we were the same height) and I reached out to gently pet him when he attacked me. My parents freaked out, blood was pouring out of my face, and apparently it initially looked as if he’d gotten my left eyes since it was covered in blood. I was rushed to the local hospital where a family physician cleaned me up and put stitches in my cheek, eyebrow, and corner of my eye. It was hard to sit still for the numbing medicine and I was crying softly through it all. I don’t remember the details of the event, but I do still have the scars on my face – scars, I am told, that would be less noticeable if a plastic surgeon had closed the wounds.
Flash forward 30 years and I’m working a night shift in the pediatric ED. A father carries in his young daughter, crying and bloody. She had been mauled by a dog – and had sustained injuries to her face only. I escort the little girl to an examining room and begin flushing her wounds with saline to get a sense of how extensive they are. Dad goes to fill out paperwork while mom holds the girl’s hand.
It was eerie – her injuries were very similar to my own. I figured she’d need a total of 15 stitches or so, all on the left side of her face. There was no missing flesh so I knew that the cosmetic result would be good. I explained to her mom that we would be able to stitch her up nicely – and that she’d likely have minimal scarring. The mom asked for a plastic surgeon – and I agreed to call one for her right away.
That night I had a new appreciation for what my parents must have felt when I was bitten. I could see these strangers’ concern – how they hoped that their little girl wouldn’t be permanently disfigured, how they wanted the most experienced doctor to do the suturing, how they held her hand as she cried. It was really tough – but we were all grateful that the injuries weren’t more severe… and I was glad that I didn’t have to do the suturing. I showed the girl my scars and she seemed comforted by how they had turned out. This experience reminded me how personal experience can add a special dimension to caring for others, and that sometimes having been a patient can make you a better doctor.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
August 8th, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in News
5 Comments »
The New York Times exposed an interesting counter-culture phenomenon today: drinking raw milk. Grocery store milk has been heated and packaged in a nearly sterile fashion so that no harmful bacteria are in it. Farmers collect raw milk from cows, then pasteurize (a heat treatment) and homogenize (blend the creamy part with the skim part) it before packaging the milk for human consumption. This process has virtually eliminated milk borne illness in this country, including the transmission of Tuberculosis, Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria.
So why are people fascinated with raw milk and seeking out farmers who will sell them milk prior to heat treatment? Raw milk does taste slightly different (I think it’s a little bit more “gamey”) and there’s no doubt that the creamy layer that floats on the top is delicious. In New York City raw milk has a black market, cult following. Should you jump on the bandwagon?
As my regular readers know, I grew up on an organic dairy farm, and had the pleasure of handling cows up close and personal for at least a decade. In fact, their sweet-smelling grass breath, and not so sweet-smelling cow patties are etched permanently in my mind. Cows are curious, somewhat dim witted, and generally oblivious to the terrain upon which they tread.
Cows will stand in manure for hours without a moment’s regret, should you present them with fresh hay to eat or some nice shortfeed. They drop patties on the ground, in their troughs, and occasionally on one other. Their flicking tails often get caked with manure as they swish flies away and they scratch their udders with dirty hooves as well.
This is why when it comes time to milk them, farmers need to wipe their udders carefully with a disinfectant scrub before applying the milk machine. Mastitis (or infection of the udder teets) is not uncommon, and is a reason for ceasing to milk a cow until the infection has cleared.
And so, the cleanliness of raw milk depends upon whether or not the farmer removes all the excrement carefully, scrubs the teets well, and remembers not to milk the cows with mastitits. It also matters whether or not the cows are harboring certain strains of bacteria – which often don’t harm the cow, but cause very serious problems for humans.
Did I drink raw milk as a kid? Occasionally, yes. Were my parents super-careful about the cleanliness of the milk? Yes. Did I ever get sick from raw milk? No. Would I give raw milk to my kids? No.
I appreciate that gourmands want to experience the flavor of raw foods, but for me, the risks are simply not worth it when it comes to milk. There is no appreciable nutritional benefit to drinking raw milk (in fact, store bought milk is fortified with Vitamin D, which is critical for healthy bones), and it caries a small risk of serious infection. If adults want to take that risk, they may do so – but I would strongly encourage them not to put their kids at risk. I agree with the FDA’s ban on interstate sales of unpasteurized milk, and would not want to see raw milk available widely for general consumption. Of course, to get around this ban, some companies are selling raw milk and cheese under the label “pet food.”
It’s a crazy country we live in – anti-bacterial hand wipes, soaps, gels, plastics and an insatiable appetite for raw milk. As a doctor, I throw up my hands. What do you think?This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
