January 16th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Health Policy, News
2 Comments »
The Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard School of Public Health teamed up to survey Americans about their healthcare reform priorities (Kaiser has been doing this every year since 1992). A random sample of 1,628 adults participated in the telephone survey between December 4-14th, 2008. The results were presented at a press conference that I attended on January 15th.
Although you might want to view a presentation of the entire webcast here, I’ll summarize the points that I found the most interesting:
Dr. Robert Blendon (Professor of Health Policy at the Harvard School of Public Health) offered some fascinating commentary on the survey results:
1. Americans Are Fickle About Healthcare Reform Issues. Most public opinion polls do not take into account the degree of conviction with which people describe their health reform priorities. In reality, the public is generally quite ambivalent regarding the specifics of how to achieve reforms like improved access to care, and decreased healthcare costs. The Kaiser survey clearly demonstrated the public’s tendency to agree with specific reform ideas, but then change their minds when the potential downsides of such initiatives were described. So for example, most survey respondents liked the idea of an employer insurance mandate (requiring employers to subsidize employee health insurance costs), but when asked if they would favor it if it might cause some employers to lay off workers, then they no longer supported the mandate.
2. Public And Government Priorities Differ. While the public is primarily focused on relief from skyrocketing healthcare costs, the government is focused on healthcare delivery reform.
3. Americans Don’t Want Change To Affect Them. An underlying theme in the survey was that the average respondent didn’t want to pay more for healthcare, and they also did not want to be forced to change their current care and coverage arrangements.
4. It’s All About Money. America is in a near economic depression, and therefore the healthcare reform climate is very different from that of 1992 (when the Clinton reform plan stalled). Middle income Americans in an economic downturn are not willing to pay more taxes. The only way forward in our current economy is to find a revenue stream for reform that does not increase taxes on the average American. Blendon summarizes:
“It isn’t enough that all the groups agree on how to spend money on healthcare. ‘Who is going to pay?’ is the critical issue.”
At this point in time, it looks as if the American public is most supportive of the healthcare reforms listed below (but their opinion is certainly subject to change, depending on how the political discussions unfold, and how the media influences the debate). Blendon also cautions: “This doesn’t mean that this is a sensible health reform plan, it’s just what has public support at the moment.”
Healthcare Reform Initiatives Currently Favored By Americans
Expanding Coverage
1. Health insurance mandate for children
2. Fill the Medicare doughnut hole
3. Tax credits to employers to help them offer coverage to more employees
4. Health insurance for the unemployed
5. Eliminate medical underwriting (“pre-existing condition” carve outs and such)
6. Expand Medicare to cover people ages 55-64 who are without health insurance
7. Require employers to offer health insurance to their workers or pay money into a government fund that will pay to cover those without insurance
8. Increased spending on medical care for veterans
9. Increased spending on SCHIP
Controlling Costs
1. Negotiate for lower drug costs under Medicare
2. Allow Americans to buy prescription drugs imported from Canada
3. More government regulation of healthcare costs
4. More government regulation of prescription drug costs
5. Regulate insurance companies’ administrative spending and profits
Raising Revenue
1. Increase the cigarette tax
2. Increase income taxes for people from families making more than $250,000 a year
***
As you can see, the public supports reform that would result in substantial increases in healthcare spending without a clear idea of how to pay for those initiatives. Our government, in partnership with healthcare’s key stakeholders, is going to need to come up with a reform plan that identifies new revenue streams to cover the costs associated with expanding coverage. I find it hard to believe that increasing taxes on cigarettes (and a few very wealthy Americans) is going to be sufficient. If ever there were a time to nurture our American entrepreneurial spirit, it’s now.
January 16th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Friday Funny, Humor
5 Comments »
Thanks for the many entries in Better Health’s first cartoon caption contest. Unfortunately, I accidentally deleted some of them several days after they’d been submitted (I was too aggressive with my anti-spam efforts). But they were all included in the contest. Our judges really struggled with choosing a winner… so they narrowed it to 2 and made them both winners!
Would you agree that it’s a toss up? Both authors will receive a Better Health t-shirt. I hope it makes them as happy as this guy. Thanks for participating!
Winner #1: Kerri Morrone Sparling “Please sign here and here and then I can write about you on my blog.”
Winner #2: Rob Falconer “Yes, we do normally weigh patients naked, Miss Saggar, but I think we’ll make an exception in your case.”
And just for a bit of trivia – the artist’s (Dr. Val’s) original caption read: “Mrs. Chen’s medical questionnaire was unremarkable except for her fine print at the end of page 3: ‘allergic to geodon.'”
January 14th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Expert Interviews, News
2 Comments »
Photo Credit: Dr. Crippen
I recently listened in to a Webinar related to infectious disease prevention strategies in elementary schools. The lead speaker (Dr. Thomas Sandora) was the principal investigator of a research study that was sponsored by Clorox and published in the Journal, Pediatrics a few months ago. I thought the results were interesting.
Study Design
This study was a randomized, controlled trial of 285 third to fifth graders in a school in Avon, Ohio. The study took place over a two-month period: from March to May, 2006. Half of the classrooms were randomized to the intervention group (which included having the kids apply hand sanitizer before and after lunch, and the teachers perform a sanitary wipe down of all their desks once/day), the other half were observed during their “business as usual” daily routine without sanitizers. The primary outcome measure was “days of school missed due to illness – either upper respiratory or gastrointestinal.” Swabs of surfaces in both the intervention and control groups were taken.
Results
Interestingly, there was no difference in the groups in terms of days of school missed due to upper respiratory type illnesses. There was a small but significant (9%) reduction in gastrointestinal-related illnesses absenteeism in the intervention group. Surface swabs picked up norovirus with higher frequency in the control group classrooms. No MRSA was detected during the study.
Discussion
Upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) are highly contagious, and are commonly spread by droplets in the air as well as surface contact (some viruses and bacteria can survive for 2 hours or more outside the body). Due to an infected child’s continuous contact with their own nasal secretions (sorry for the graphic photo), it is difficult to reduce the spread of URIs through the occasional hand washing or sanitizing. One would have to wash a child’s hands after each time they touched their mouth or nose.
On the other hand, gastrointestinal infections like norovirus are spread via the fecal-oral route, and are therefore not dripped and sneezed all over the place the way URI-causing viruses tend to be. Instead, GI infections are spread when hands are not washed thoroughly after a trip to the bathroom – and then food is touched and ingested.
So it’s not all that surprising that the transmission of GI-related infections were particularly susceptible to this study’s intervention: hand sanitizing before and after lunch, and a daily desk surface wipe.
An interesting point that Dr. Sandora made was that alcohol-based hand sanitizers don’t contribute to antibiotic resistance, because their killing mechanism is not related to antibiotics. I guess it’s like saying that humans don’t become resistant to knife injuries when exposed to attacks with greater frequency.
Conclusions
Hand sanitizer and surface disinfectant strategies may be more effective in reducing the transmission of gastrointestinal illnesses than respiratory tract illnesses in elementary school children. But since compliance is challenging – the total reduction in GI illness transmission remains modest though probably worth the hygiene effort. One glance at the photo above tells you all you need to know.
January 14th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Primary Care Wednesdays
No Comments »
By Steve Simmons, M.D.
Gordian Knot: 1: an intricate problem ; especially : a problem insoluble in its own terms —often used in the phrase cut the Gordian knot 2: a knot tied by Gordius, king of Phrygia, held to be capable of being untied only by the future ruler of Asia, and cut by Alexander the Great with his sword
Generations ago, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Code of Ethics stipulated that allowing a third party to profit from a physician’s labor was unethical. This tenet resides in a time when house calls were common place; when trust and respect helped forge an immutable bond between doctor and patient; and when it would have been unthinkable to allow anyone other than the doctor, family, or patient to have a role within the doctor-patient relationship.
The landscape of today’s healthcare system and its delivery methods make the authors of the AMA’s forgotten code look prescient. Insurance companies, controlling the purse strings, have become an unwelcome partner within the doctor-patient relationship, frequently dictating what can and can’t be done, and are reaping a healthy profit from their oversight. Obscene salaries and large bonuses are awarded to the CEOs of these companies for keeping as much money as they can from those providing health services, with the CEO United Healthcare being reported as receiving a $324 million paycheck during a five year period. Thus, short-term business strategies are given priority, often at the expense of patients’ long-term medical goals, creating a Gordian knot so entwined that no one – patients, doctors, insurance providers, or government regulators – can see a way to unravel it.
A result of so much money being skimmed off the top is that no one seems to be getting what they need, let alone want. Patients long for more time to discuss problems with their doctor and wish it were easier to get an appointment. Yet physicians are unable to receive adequate reimbursement from insurance companies for their services, and if they do get reimbursement, it’s after months of waiting and often at the high expense of having a posse of back office staff needed to negotiate these payments. These physicians therefore are forced to overload their schedule and rapidly move patients through their office if they are to earn their typical $150,000 per year, pay off medical school debt, and afford the salaries of their office employees. Finally, government agencies, looking for the elusive loop to tug on, ultimately burden physicians further with a myriad of onerous rules and regulations.
Read more »
January 13th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in News
No Comments »
This is one of the saddest stories I’ve read in a while. H/t to GruntDoc.
Dr. Michael Sanchez, who in a few months as director of University Hospital’s busy emergency department slashed waiting times and reduced the number of patients turned away because of overcrowding, was struck and killed while jogging Sunday afternoon.
His own emergency department colleagues tried to save Sanchez without recognizing him because of the extent of his injuries. Only after he was pronounced dead did they learn it was Sanchez, hospital staff said.
…
Police said Sanchez was struck in the 11600 block of Bandera Road about 1:40 p.m. Sunday. The driver told police he was on his way to get the brakes on his SUV fixed when his cell phone rang. As he answered it, he said he spotted Sanchez on the side.
According to a police report, Smith said he hit the brakes and the car swerved onto the shoulder, striking Sanchez and sending him onto the hood of the car.
A witness said the driver swerved across two lanes before striking the victim. Police said no charges have been filed.
…
Rufe said Sanchez had so much enthusiasm and energy for the job, it made some of his colleagues skeptical about him. But it was that drive that allowed him to push the department beyond the way things had traditionally been done.
“He was telling me one day, ‘I love my job. I love what I do. I love my family. We have a wonderful home. I can’t ask for anything else. And now the possibility of a residency program. I’m just a fortunate person,’” Rufe said.
