July 22nd, 2010 by Berci in Announcements, Better Health Network, Medblogger Shout Outs
Tags: Doctor Tweets, Doctors On Twitter, Healthcare Social Media, Social Media In Medicine, Social Networking For Doctors, Twitter Doctors
No Comments »


Twitter Doctors is a new site that lists and ranks all the doctors who are active on Twitter based on the number of followers, retweets, etc. Currently I’m in the top 5 (Twitter.com/Berci), and I hope to stay there for awhile. If you aren’t included in the list, tweet about the website and follow @dawson to be included.
*This blog post was originally published at ScienceRoll*
July 22nd, 2010 by David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D. in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion, Quackery Exposed, Research
Tags: Alt-Med World, American Nurses Association, Andrew Wakefield, Anti-Vaccine Propaganda, Anti-Vaccine Quackery, Autism, CAM, Complementary And Alternative Medicine, Dr. Kimball Atwood, Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Rolando Arafiles, Family Physician, H1N1, Health2Fit, License To Practice Medicine, Medical Quackery, Morgellons Disease, Naturopathy, North Carolina Board of Medical Examiners, North Carolina Integrative Medicine Society, North Carolina Medical Board, Nutritional Supplement, Pseudomedicine, Pseudoscience, SBM, Science Based Medicine, Shruggie, Suzanne Somers, Texas Medical Board, Texas Nurses Association, TMB, Unscientific Medicine, Urine Therapy, Whistleblowing Nurses, Winkler County Memorial Hospital, Zrii
No Comments »

I can’t speak for anyone else who blogs here at Science-Based Medicine, but there’s one thing I like to emphasize to people who complain that we exist only to “bash ‘alternative’ medicine.” We don’t. We exist to champion medicine based on science against all manner of dubious practices. Part of that mandate involves understanding and accepting that science-based medicine (SBM) is not perfect. It is not some sort of panacea. Rather, it has many shortcomings and all too often does not live up to its promise.
Our argument is merely that, similar to Winston Churchill’s invocation of the famous saying that “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried,” science-based medicine is the worst form of medicine except for all the others that have been tried before. (Look for someone to quote that sentence soon.) It’s not even close, either. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Science-Based Medicine*
July 21st, 2010 by GarySchwitzer in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion, Quackery Exposed, Research
Tags: ADHD, Autism, Bible of Psychiatry, Bipolar Disorder, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Dr. Allen Frances, Dr. Daniel Carlat, DSM-IV, Duke University School of Medicine, Gary Schwitzer, HealthNewsReview.org, Mental Disorder, Mental Disorder Epidemics, Mental Health, Mental Illness, National Institute of Mental Health, NIMH, Normality, Overdiagnosis, Psychiatric Fads, Psychiatric Times, Psychiatry, Psychology, Unhinged
No Comments »

There’s a noteworthy column in Psychiatric Times, “Normality Is an Endangered Species: Psychiatric Fads and Overdiagnosis,” by Allen Frances, M.D. He was chair of the task force that worked on the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual — DSM-IV — one edition of the “bible of psychiatry.” He is professor emeritus of psychiatry at Duke University School of Medicine. There’s a lot of common ground between what Dr. Frances writes and what Dr. Daniel Carlat (the subject of an earlier blog posting) writes about. Dr. Frances is concerned about the directions that might be taken in the authoring of DSM-V, now underway.
Excerpts:
“Fads in psychiatric diagnosis come and go and have been with us as long as there has been psychiatry. The fads meet a deeply felt need to explain, or at least to label, what would otherwise be unexplainable human suffering and deviance. In recent years the pace has picked up and false “epidemics” have come in bunches involving an ever-increasing proportion of the population. We are now in the midst of at least 3 such epidemics–of autism, attention deficit, and childhood bipolar disorder. And unless it comes to its senses, DSM5 threatens to provoke several more (hypersexuality, binge eating, mixed anxiety depression, minor neurocognitive, and others). Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview Blog*
July 21st, 2010 by RyanDuBosar in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News
Tags: Doctors As Industry Marketing Agents, Family Medicine, General Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Industry Support, Internal Medicine, Medical Advertisement, Medical Marketing, Pri-Med East 2010, Primary Care, Primary Medicine Conference
No Comments »

Harvard’s annual primary medicine conference, Pri-Med East 2010, will move the industry-supported portion of the program off-site, and marketing will be further restricted (advertisements had been allowed in bathrooms, for example.) A Harvard official said the new rules are meant to keep doctors from becoming or appearing as industry marketing agents. (The Boston Globe)
*This blog post was originally published at ACP Internist*
July 21st, 2010 by AlanDappenMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Opinion, Primary Care Wednesdays, Research, True Stories
Tags: Accessibility, Affordability, Case Report, Convenience, Cost Less, Direct Pay, DocTalker Family Medicine, Dr. Alan Dappen, Empowerment, Fixing American Healthcare, General Medicine, Got It, I Get It Moment, Internal Medicine, Just A Phone Call Away, Medical Practice Mission, Price Transparency, Primary Care, Quality, Trust
No Comments »
After seven years, my wife has finally stopped asking me for “The Power of DocTalker” story of the day. Now when I start with the details of the latest case report justifying the model, she stops me with “I get it, I get it! Go write the case report up and post it on your website for others to ‘get it,’ too.”
Case reports center on the mission of our medical practice, with points regarding care that include quality, accessibility, convenience, affordability, empowerment, trust, and price transparency. Because our patients pay us directly for the service and don’t necessarily expect any insurance “reimbursement,” we are a very unique practice. We adhere to the points in our mission and also outperform all our local competition — i.e. medical offices that accept insurance payment for service in order to survive as a business.
To the patient, our services cost a lot less than services available via the insurance model. About 40 percent of our clientele have no insurance, and the other 60 percent have insurance yet chose to use our services because they believe it’s worth paying directly in order to assume control of their care. (As a quick aside — my favorite clients in this group are health insurance executives and CEOs of large companies, who have the best health insurance in the country.) Read more »