This isn’t really plastic surgery related, but considering that I am always trying to get patients to get more active or to remain active, then maybe it is. I like to tell my patients that I have the easy part, they have the hard part of maintaining the results. This is especially true for the liposuction or abdominoplasty patients where keeping their weight in line is an issue to outcome in years to come.
There is a new article published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association earlier this week which looked at different types of exercise after a myocardial infarction (MI).
The authors, Dr Margherita Vona et al, did a controlled trial using 209 patients who were referred to cardiac rehabilitation after having an MI. These patients were then randomly assigned to one of four groups: aerobic training, resistance training, both combined, or no exercise.
The researchers looked at flow-mediated dilation (improve blood vessel function) at baseline after 4 weeks of exercise, and then again one month after stopping training. The flow-mediated dilation more than doubled with exercise, from about 4% to about 10% in all three exercise groups. Those in the no exercise group had a small increase from the baseline 4% to about 5%.
The benefits of physical activity did not last when the activity ended. Within a month of no exercise, the flow-mediated function returned to baseline levels.
The important finding of this study is as Dr Vona said, “Long-term adherence to training programs is necessary to maintain vascular benefits on endothelial function.”
Exercise / physical activity has to be like “brushing your teeth”. It needs to be something that you do regularly and not just once or this week, but for life.
It is not important which physical activity you choose to do, it is important that you do it. It is important that you continue to be physically active on a regular basis.
Source
“Effects of different types of exercise training followed by detraining on endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with recent myocardial infarction”; Circulation 2009; DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.821736; Vona M, et al
Electronic Medical Records are coming. The economic stimulus bill (furious spinning kittens notwithstanding) assured this.
Under the terms of the bill, CMS will offer incentives to medical practices that adopt and use electronic medical records technology. Beginning in 2011, physicians will get $44,000 to $64,000 over five years for implementing and using a certified EMR. The Congressional Budget Office projects that such incentives will push up to 90 percent of U.S. physicians to use EMRs over the next 10 years.
Practices that don’t adopt CCHIT-certified EMR systems by 2014 will have their Medicare reimbursement rates cut by up to 3 percent beginning in 2015.
There will be even more money for implementation. We look forward to our checks (and are not counting on them yet).
Now it is time for the flies to start gathering. Wherever there is lots of money, “experts” pop up and new products become available that hope to cash in. Doctors, who are never lauded for their business acumen, will be especially susceptible to hucksters pushing their wares. It seems from the outside to be an simple thing: put medical records on computers and watch the cash fly in.
Anyone who has implemented EMR, however, can attest that the use of the word “simple” is a dead giveaway that the person uttering the word in relation to EMR is either totally clueless or running a scam. It’s like saying “easy solution to the Mideast unrest,” “obvious way to bring world peace,” or “makes exercise easy and fun.”
Run away quickly when you hear this type of thing.
Just like becoming a doctor is a long-term arduous process, EMR implementation happens with time, planning, and effort. It’s not impossible to become a doctor, but it isn’t easy. With EMR adoption, the most important factor in success is the implementation process. A poorly implemented EMR isn’t simply non-functional, it makes medical practice harder. A well implemented EMR doesn’t just function, it improves quality and profitability.
How do I know? Our practice ranks very high for quality (NCQA certified for diabetes, physicians are consistently ranked high for quality by insurers), and we out-earn 95% of other primary care physicians. EMR allows us to practice good medicine in a manner that is much more efficient.
So how’s a doc to know who to trust? What product should he/she buy and whose advice about implementation should they follow? There are many resources out there. Here are a few I think are especially worthwhile:
Buy a product that is certified by Certification Commission for Health Information Technology. CCHIT is a government task force established to set standards for EMR products. Its goal is to allow systems to communicate with each other and enable more interfaces in the future. The bonuses for docs on EMR are contingent on the system being CCHIT certified (think of it as something like the WiFi standard).
Several professional IT organizations have programs to improve EMR adoption, including HIMSS and TEPR.
Austin Merritt has written a good article of advice on his website Software Advice that underlines the importance of implementation.
The best advice I can give, however, is to visit a doctor’s office who is using an EMR successfully. This office should be as close in make-up to your office as is possible. You should be able to look at how they do it and see yourself in that situation. Never buy a product before visiting at least one office like this (no matter how good the sales pitch). When you visit, make sure you ask them about the implementation process. How did they do it and how hard was it?
Which EMR do I recommend? Remember, I have been on EMR for over 12 years, so haven’t had much of a chance to shop around. You hear raves and horror stories with every product. Here is some basic advice:
Get a solid CCHIT-approved brand that has been around for a while
Don’t pay as much attention to price as you do function. Since the EMR will be absolutely central to the function of your office, it is a dumb mistake to overly-emphasize cost.
Realize you are paying for a company, not just a product. It is not like buying a car, it is more like having a child or getting married. REALLY research that side of things. A good EMR with a bad company behind it should be avoided like the plague.
See how connected the user-base is as well. A solid user group will do much to make up any deficiencies in the product and/or company.
So much time is spent shopping over EMR products, but buying an EMR is like being accepted into Medical School; your work is just beginning. That’s OK, because like medical school, the effort put in gives a very worthwhile product.
In a surprise, President Obama has signaled a willingness to discuss medical liability as part of the health reform process.
Good for him for standing up to the trial lawyers, a core constituency of the left.
That’s a good sign, as the costs of defensive medicine brought on by the broken malpractice system, should be addressed if there is any hope of reducing health care spending.
Trial lawyers like to say that medical malpractice represents “less than one percent of the cost of health care,” but that fails to account for the substantial sum attributed to defensive medicine doctors practice to avoid the threat of malpractice, estimated to be $210 billion annually.
Furthermore, the argument that malpractice reform will harm patients “by limiting their ability to seek compensation through the courts” doesn’t hold water either.
That’s because the current system does a miserable job of compensating patients for medical errors, where more than 50 cents on every compensated dollar goes to pay lawyers and the courts. Not to mention that a typical malpractice trial may last years before an injured patient receives a single penny.
So, don’t believe the arguments of the trial lawyers, who prefer the financial security of the status quo.
Any alternative system, such as no-fault malpractice, mediation, or health courts, will go a long way both to reduce the cost of medical care, and fairly compensate more patients for medical errors at a significantly more expedient rate.
Lawyers are aware of these facts, and to their credit, are going on a preemptive offensive to head off tort reform. If I were the AMA, I would start pro-actively circulating some of the above talking points, rather than reacting to the trial lawyers.
Not anymore. Today, their front row partner is Coca-Cola. Diet Coke that is.
Dr. Val and I were among a small group of women’s health advocates who met last week to hear the latest on NHLBI’s campaign with Diet Coke and how the fashion industry is bringing an important public health message to women.
Diet Coke’s commitment to the Heart Truth campaign is unprecedented, one of the “largest public awareness initiatives we have ever undertaken,” said Celeste Bottoroff, VP Living Well, Coca-Cola North America.
Leading Diet Coke’s campaign? Endless-legs Heidi Klum and other fashion-conscious women who have revamped the little red dress campaign into a national symbol with guts, curves and most importantly results.
“In 2002, only 34% of the women in this country knew heart disease was the leading cause of death among American women,” Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, NHLBI director, told the group. “But we’re making progress. Today, as a result of the Heart Truth campaign and others like it, 65% of the women now know it’s the number one killer.”
Nabel led a discussion of the common myths associated with women’s heart heath and recalled her own experiences as a cardiology resident when women were caregivers who supported husbands, fathers and other male family members through heart ailments but often ignored or brushed aside their own symptoms for fear that treatment would interfere with domestic chores such as childrearing, cooking, and cleaning. “Even when older women came in with heart problems, they weren’t treated as aggressively as men,” Nabel admitted.
“Most women still need educating,” she remarked. “80% of middle-aged women still have at least one risk factor for heart disease. And just one, doubles your risk of actually having heart disease.”
Joining Nabel were Phyllis Greenberger, President and CEO of the Society for Women’s Health Research, Susan Bennett, MD, Clinical Director of the George Washington University Hospital’s Women’s Heart Program and Robyn Flipse, MS, RD, author and nutrition consultant to discuss the campaign’s most important messages. First, heart disease is not a man’s disease, a point often raised by group’s such as those headed by Greenberger who cited research indicating that only 17% of cardiologists and 8% of primary care physicians know that heart disease is the leading cause of death among women.
And it’s not just for the aged either. “When a 40 year old woman has heart disease it’s worse than a 40 year old man,” said Bennett recalling patients in their 20s and 30s in her practice. “It’s never too late to change your lifestyle,” Flipse added. “The body is very forgiving. Even a 10% drop in weight can have a positive impact on blood pressure, cholesterol and other important risk factors.”
The Heart Truth campaign, thanks to the vision of Dr. Nabel and the willingness of NHLBI to partner with a highly visible, social icon such as Diet Coke is just what’s needed to cut through the feel good messaging that most public health campaigns resort to. Having lived with heart disease my entire adult life (now well into middle age), it’s a welcome boost of energy and the visibility possible with this campaign is unparalleled. Along with it comes some very important information that can save women’s lives.
Look for the heart truth emblem on 6 Billion Diet Coke cans, at community public forms, at American Idol, and fashion shows across the country. Diet Coke, with Heidi’s help, has even designed a new red dress label pin which strongly resembles an hour-glass. And what woman doesn’t want that?
I’d like to welcome Dr. Jon LaPook, medical correspondent for the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, to the Better Health team of bloggers. Jon will be contributing video interviews on engaging consumer health topics on a weekly basis. This first contribution is a video interview with male fertility expert Dr. Harry Fisch, combined with some entertaining “man on the street” discussions in Columbus Circle, NYC. Let me know what you think!
It’s no secret that doctors are disappointed with the way that the U.S. healthcare system is evolving. Most feel helpless about improving their work conditions or solving technical problems in patient care. Fortunately one young medical student was undeterred by the mountain of disappointment carried by his senior clinician mentors…
I am proud to be a part of the American Resident Project an initiative that promotes the writing of medical students residents and new physicians as they explore ideas for transforming American health care delivery. I recently had the opportunity to interview three of the writing fellows about how to…
I m often asked to do book reviews on my blog and I rarely agree to them. This is because it takes me a long time to read a book and then if I don t enjoy it I figure the author would rather me remain silent than publish my…
When I was in medical school I read Samuel Shem s House Of God as a right of passage. At the time I found it to be a cynical yet eerily accurate portrayal of the underbelly of academic medicine. I gained comfort from its gallows humor and it made me…
I am hesitant to review diet books because they are so often a tangled mess of fact and fiction. Teasing out their truth from falsehood is about as exhausting as delousing a long-haired elementary school student. However after being approached by the authors’ PR agency with the promise of a…
