May 5th, 2010 by SteveSimmonsMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Humor, Opinion, Primary Care Wednesdays, True Stories
No Comments »
In medicine, hardly a week passes without the introduction of some new acronym, previously unspoken in the average practice, which then grows to prominence — take HIPAA, PECOS, CPT, ICD, etc. — the list goes on and on.
I believe that after 14 years of practice I’ve earned the right to introduce an acronym of my own: CRAPP. For the last several months, my partner and I have used this term to describe the volumes of denials, pre- and prior- authorizations (is there really a difference?), and faxes that seem to grow like weeds on the fertile planting grounds of our desks.
More specifically, in our office the acronym CRAPP stands for: Continuous Restrictive And Punitive Paperwork. To put it blithely, CRAPP could represent any document you wish someone had put on your partner’s desk instead of yours.
On a more emotional level, this acronym captures the visceral response I have whenever my attention is drawn away from my patients and redirected towards some nonsensical busywork — much like someone yelling at a golfer during their backswing.
Read more »
April 14th, 2010 by SteveSimmonsMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion, Primary Care Wednesdays
2 Comments »
This past Monday, I was drawn to an article in the Wall Street Journal: “Medical Schools Can’t Keep Up.” The article detailed the growing shortage of primary care doctors in our country and reminded me that we in the U.S. may have something called “insurance reform” now, but without physicians to translate insurance access into healthcare, the state of our healthcare system will continue to beg additional attention and reform.
Although new medical schools are opening and some schools have increased enrollment numbers, there are a limited number of residency positions in this country. The government has always funded these residency positions and our new reform law tries to address the primary care shortage with “slot redistribution,” whereby money from unused residency positions will be deferred to primary care or general surgery residency programs. Read more »
March 31st, 2010 by SteveSimmonsMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Opinion, Primary Care Wednesdays
1 Comment »
As the period of debate over the Healthcare Reform Bill ends with President Obama penning his signature, one moment from the “debate” at Blair House stands out in my mind. A Republican Congressman sitting behind a copy of the then-current reform bill –- a pile higher than 2,000 pages –- was mocked for using such a prop. It’s complicated to fix healthcare with the laconic response to his theatrics.
Things don’t appear to have grown any simpler as we settle in for a period of discovery to determine exactly what this new law spells out for us in terms of reform. There is no consensus on whether this law will help or hinder, and I’m worried.
I cannot read 2,600 pages written in legalese. I juggle my time now to keep up with the medical literature necessary to adequately do my job and I suspect other physicians struggle similarly. All doctors fight a daily battle with time, trying to care for each patient in the best way possible (this is why many of us walk so fast through hospitals and clinics.) I hope that healthcare reform doesn’t result in less time for direct patient care. Read more »
March 17th, 2010 by SteveSimmonsMD in Primary Care Wednesdays
No Comments »
In my last post I encouraged everyone to watch the health care debate at Blair House mediated by President Obama. For this, I must apologize — I ignored the maxim that one should neither watch sausage nor laws being made. I had arranged to work from home that February 25 since I planned my next post to be a review of this much touted debate. As the proceedings began, I felt cautiously optimistic as I watched our politicians gather to supposedly mediate their differences; yet as the sun set that day I was incognizant of any path towards meaningful reform that our elected leaders could set upon as a result of their interaction.
Webster’s online dictionary lists two meanings of the word debate, with the first being: “a variance of opinion on a matter,” which best describes my recollections of that day. However, the other definition: “a careful weighing of the reasons for or against something,” may better explain my hopes of what would transpire because of the debate, but fails to describe what really occurred that day. The realization of this fact only deepens my disenchantment with what Washington has created and now dubs “Healthcare Reform.” When I try to recall the actual debate, I hear within my mind lots of static and background noise yet I can recall nothing of significance. What I hear reminds me of the voice of the schoolteacher from the Charlie Brown cartoons I watched during my childhood. Read more »
February 24th, 2010 by SteveSimmonsMD in Primary Care Wednesdays
1 Comment »
I don’t know if I can do it this time. A month ago, when it appeared that Congress had backed out of passing Health Care Reform legislation, I felt neither happy nor sad. I didn’t know how I felt but this past Monday, after the following triad of events had unfolded, it became clear to me that I feel weary towards the whole healthcare reform process:
- First, several states temporarily halted a rapacious rise in health insurance premiums from companies with quarterly profits last year in the billions of dollars. Seriously, don’t these companies have PR firms?
- Second, the Senate Finance Committee actually issued a drug warning and in this one act illuminated either a glaring problem with Congress or – far more concerning and unfortunately for us, more likely in this instance–some type of bias at the FDA.
- Thirdly, the President called for a televised debate on health care between ‘both sides.’ Then, within days, he posted his own plan on the White House website. It is a ten page summary I found hard to follow that left me with a troubling sense of déjà-vu.
Read more »
