October 9th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Health Tips, News, Video
No Comments »
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNPftTx3m8I
1. Myth #1: Breast cancer doesn’t run in my family, so I’m less likely to get it.
A strong family history predicts breast cancer in only 5-10% of women in the US. In fact, 80% of breast cancer cases occur in women with no known family history of breast cancer whatsoever.
2. Myth #2: A lump in my breast means that I have breast cancer. Read more »
July 9th, 2009 by Dr. Val Jones in Announcements, Health Policy, Humor
9 Comments »
To join the event live, please contact john.briley@getbetterhealth.com Seating is limited…
Congressman Paul Ryan
Media Personality Rea Blakey
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
Health Care Reform: Putting Patients First
Elected Officials Join America’s Top Medical Bloggers to Discuss the Real,
Clinical Impact of Health Care Reform
WHAT: As the health care debate heats up on the Hill, join Representative Paul Ryan as he sits down with top medical bloggers from across the country to discuss health care reform and its impact on practicing clinicians. This keynote discussion will be followed by two panels of physician and nurse bloggers who will highlight the importance of putting patients first. Topics covered will include key barriers to health care quality, affordability, and access as well as the potential pitfalls of a new public plan and ways to fix the current system without investing billions in a new one.
WHEN: |
|
Friday, July 17, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. |
|
WHERE: |
|
The National Press Club, Broadcast Operations Center 4th Floor, 529 14th St. NW, Washington, DC |
|
WHO: |
|
Keynote: Representative Paul Ryan, (R-WI), House Budget Committee Ranking MemberModerator: Rea Blakey, Emmy award-winning health reporter and news anchor, previously with ABC, CNN, and now with Discovery Health
Host: Val Jones, M.D., CEO and Founder of Better Health
Policy Expert: Robert Goldberg, Ph.D., co-founder and vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest (CMPI)
Primary Care Panelists:
Kevin Pho, M.D., Internist and author of KevinMD
Rob Lamberts, M.D., Med/Peds specialist and author of Musings of a Distractible Mind
Alan Dappen, M.D., Family Physician and Better Health contributor
Valerie Tinley, N.P., Nurse Practitioner and Better Health contributor
Specialty Care Panelists:
Kim McAllister, R.N., Emergency Medicine nurse and author of Emergiblog
Westby Fisher, M.D., Cardiac Electrophysiologist and author of Dr.Wes
Rich Fogoros, M.D., Cardiologist and author of CovertRationingBlog
And Fixing American Healthcare
Jim Herndon, M.D., past president of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Better Health contributor |
####
For more information on Better Health, visit https://www.getbetterhealth.com.
June 24th, 2009 by RamonaBatesMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy
No Comments »
I was in the “audience” of the phone conference today organized by Dr. Bob Goldberg, President, Center for Medicine in the Public Interest (CMPI). In addition to him, Dr. Val Jones (Founder and CEO of Better Health) and Dr Gary Puckrein (President, National Minority Quality Forum) were on the panel of speakers. The focus was to be on the risks of government-run healthcare.
It seemed to me that many good points were made, but the main one was that the focus of the healthcare discussion needs to be refocused on the patient and the care given rather than simply on the high cost of care/insurance and any cost savings to be gained short-term. As Dr Wes pointed out in his recent post (The $400 Billion Dollar Question), patients aren’t at the “table” of many of the discussions of healthcare reform that are taking place.
Should America understand precisely what is being cut when we see $400 billion suddenly disappear from the health care reform budget?
I would argue we must know.
After all, it’s we the patients who are not at the policy table, and you can bet that it’s the patients who will ultimately be paying the tab, be it directly through health care premiums, or indirectly by taxation or deficit spending.
There were two links given by the CMPI as sources for factual information on the healthcare discussion: publicplanfacts.org and biggovhealth.org.
I went to both, but in an effort to keep this post at a reasonable length will highlight only a few from the first link. First this one —
- Public plan proponents are advocating a $1.25 per hour per employee tax to pay for the public plan. The Commonwealth Fund, “The Path to a High Performance U.S. Health System”, p. 29, February 2009.
I won’t comment on that one, but will this next one:
- Under the public plan, doctors and hospitals would see their reimbursements for providing medical care cut by as much as 30%. The Commonwealth Fund , “The Path to a High Performance U.S. Health System”, p.33, February 2009.
This decrease in reimbursement troubles me as I have watched the struggles many hospitals have experienced over the past several years with the current reimbursements. I think this trend will only get worse. Check out Barbara Duck’s series at Medical Quack on desperate hospitals. Here’s an excerpt from the May 24, 2009 post:
In Chicago, Illinois
The Loyola University Health System in west suburban Maywood on Tuesday said it will eliminate more than 440 jobs, or about 8 percent of its workforce, amid the recession and an economic downturn causing an influx of patients who cannot pay their bills.
The cost of patients who cannot pay has increased 73 percent, to $31.3 million from $18.1 million, from a year earlier for the nine months ended March 31.
“We have been hit by a number of things,” Dr. Paul Whelton, chief executive of Loyola University Health System, said in an interview. “We are having more trouble with charity care, and the money we are getting [from patients] is more slow to come in. But we have a mission to provide care in our communities and we are going to stick to it.”
In all this talk on healthcare reform, it seems to me and others at the phone conference that the quality of patient care rather than simply cost containment needs to be put back at the front of the discussion. Healthcare should provide care without being hampered by more and more rules and regulations in an effort to contain costs. We don’t need more rules like the Medicare’s 75% rule.
Saving money by providing an inferior “product” isn’t what any of us want. Is it?
*This blog post was originally published at Suture for a Living*