February 3rd, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Health Policy, Medblogger Shout Outs
1 Comment »
One of my favorite healthcare policy blogs is Dr. Rich’s Covert Rationing. In his most recent post he discusses a research study linking New York State’s public report card system to increased heart patient death rates. Doctors’ names are published alongside their procedure-related mortality figures, so if a patient dies while undergoing a risky (though potentially life-saving) procedure, the doctor’s grade suffers.
It’s no surprise that doctors are more hesitant to operate on high risk patients if their professional reputation is on the line. The result is that patients with heart problems in New York State are less likely to receive life saving therapies.
Now here’s where my outrage increased exponentially – Dr. Rich argues that report cards are actively promoted by payers (health insurance companies and the government) under the guise of patient empowerment (they deserve transparency about their doctors’ performance record, right?) But the real truth is that the payers are benefiting financially from the report card system. Fewer procedures mean lower pay outs, and if high risk patients die sooner, then they save even more on care costs.
Man, that’s depressing. So many reforms with “good intentions” result in unanticipated harm. Though strangely I can’t think of too many reforms that harm the payers. Can you?This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
February 2nd, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Opinion
No Comments »
I must have a really trustworthy face. No matter where I go, absolute strangers ask me for directions, they request that I watch their belongings, hold their place in line, they even ask me to help with their kids. I am continually astonished by the uninvited inquiries that I receive walking down the street, on the train, or even in foreign countries. I guess people think I’m both harmless and likely to know how to help them. They are right about the first part, and not quite as right about the second.
Just a couple of days ago I was settling into a train seat when the woman in front of me peaked over the head rest and asked if I’d mind watching her bags while she left to go to the restroom. I happily agreed to do so, wondering what I’d actually do if someone tried to take her bag. And as I mused about how on earth I’d won her absolute confidence without even making eye contact, I began to think about the idea of trust. How do patients decide whom they trust with their medical care?
I’d like to think that trust is earned – and many times it is – but there’s also something more primitive about it than that. Without knowing a person for long enough to judge his or her character, we often draw conclusions nonetheless. How successful are we at these snap decisions? Well, we might be quite good at it. I was amused to find an online test where you may judge the sincerity of a person’s smile just by looking at a 4 second video clip. Some of the models were asked to smile convincingly, and others were told a joke or were caused to laugh by some genuine means. Most people figure out which smile is contrived and which is natural most of the time. See how you do.
And so, when it comes to finding a primary care physician, or a doctor that you trust with your medical care, should you rely on your gut instincts or is there a better way to assess their competency?
I’ve wrestled with the idea of online physician ratings for a couple of years. Part of me thinks that it’s impossible to capture all the qualities of a good physician in some simplified form filled out by non-medical professionals. But another part of me wonders if a large collection of different experiences might add up to an opinion trend that’s on the mark. Whether or not you’re a fan of physician ratings, they are here to stay. Perhaps the best we can do is offer as many ratings as possible so that the average might provide high level, helpful information. Revolution Health has a free physician rating tool. Check it out.
How do you know whom to trust? Do you rely on your instincts or the referral of someone you know? Would online physician ratings be helpful, harmful, or simply limited in their utility?
Let me know… and if you see me on the street, yes, I’d be happy to watch your bags.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
February 1st, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in True Stories
5 Comments »
For various reasons, our healthcare system has become very fragmented. Physicians are under financial incentives to do tests and procedures (rather than counsel patients), to become specialists instead of generalists, and to diagnose and treat large volumes of people at 5-10 minute intervals. Gone are the days when primary care physicians took care of 3 generations of family members, watching them grow, understanding their mental and physical health intimately, and helping them to get the right care at the right time. Doctors are rarely part of the family anymore, they’re robots on a really fast treadmill, doling out test results and prescribing procedures based on population based protocols deemed maximally efficient at treating disease at minimal cost.
Does this transition from trusted friend to mechanical puppet matter in terms of health outcomes? The argument is that using lab tests and evidence-based protocols substantially improve health – which is why government initiatives like Pay for Performance are pressuring physicians to treat you from a common diagnostic cookbook. But when we lose the human element in medicine, the long term relationships (aka “continuity of care”), we may misdiagnose people and prescribe inappropriate treatments. Working at lightning speed adds fuel to this dangerous fire. Perhaps a true life example will crystallize my arguments:
Frannie Miller was a thin 86 year old woman living independently with her husband. Although she was slightly forgetful, she managed to do all the cooking, cleaning, and general home upkeep. One day she slipped on the stairs entering her house and fell on the cement. She fractured two of her vertebrae and spent some time in the hospital to manage her pain. Upon discharge she decided to stay with her son’s family since she wasn’t able to return to her usual independent regimen. Her son, dutiful as he was, carefully recorded all of the medications that she had in her pill bottles, and set up a daily schedule to administer them to her. What her son didn’t realize, however, is that Frannie had been prescribed these medications by three different physicians operating independently of one another.
Frannie had mild heart failure with a tendency to retain some fluid around her ankles, so she was prescribed a low dose diuretic by a certain physician. Of course, Frannie didn’t think she really needed the medicine, and never took it. On a follow up visit with another physician, Frannie was noted to have the same mild ankle swelling, and (assuming that she was taking her medicine as directed) the new doctor believed that she needed a higher dose of the medicine and prescribed her a new bottle (which of course, Frannie never took). About 6 months later at a follow up appointment, a third physician met Fannie and further increased her diuretic dose.
So when Frannie arrived in a weakened state at her son’s house, and he decided to give her all the prescribed medications, she received a massive dose of diuretics for the first time. Several days after convalescing at home, Frannie became delirious (from severe dehydration) and not knowing why her mental status had changed, her son took her to the nearest hospital.
Of course, no one knew Frannie at the hospital and had no records or knowledge of her health history or her baseline mental status. She was admitted to a very busy general medicine floor where (after being examined only very briefly) she was believed to have advanced senile dementia and hospice care was recommended for her. Her son was told that she probably wouldn’t live beyond a few weeks and that he should take her home to die. A visiting nurse service was set up and Frannie was discharged home.
How is it that a fully functional 86 year old woman was sentenced to death? It was because of a lack of continuity of care (a shared online medical record could have helped) with doctors moving so quickly that no one took the time to sort out her real problem. Are diuretics appropriate treatment for heart failure? Yes. Did any one doctor violate Pay for Performance rules for heart failure? No. Did the population based protocols work for Frannie? Heck no.
There are so many Frannies out there in our healthcare system today. How can we measure the harm done to patients by the fragmentation of care? Who will collect that data and show the collateral damage of the death of primary care?
This particular cloud – thankfully – has a silver lining. A physician friend of Frannie’s son happened to inquire about her health. The son explained that she was dying, and the physician rightly pointed out that there was no real medical reason for her to be that ill. The friend asked to see her medication list, and knowing that Frannie weighed about 80 pounds was shocked to see a daily dose of 120mg of lasix. Slowly the diuretic SNAFU became clear and the family friend asked that Frannie be immediately rehydrated. She perked up like a wilted flower and returned to her usual state of health within days. Frannie was cured.
I believe that we must find a way to get shared medical records online for all Americans. Having scads of frantic specialists operating independent of one another for the wellbeing of the same patient, yet without being able to share a common record, is endangering an untold number of lives. Not having continuity of care – a primary care physician for each American – is also endangering lives and reducing quality of care. If we could get these two fixes in place, I believe we’d have revolutionized this country’s healthcare system.
What do you think?This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
January 21st, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Uncategorized
No Comments »
Health tips
Are you struggling with depression? Mira Kirshenbaum suggests that talk therapy may be more effective than medications.
Does your child have mono? Dr. Stacy Stryer explains that mono has very different symptoms depending on a child’s age.
Be careful of vitamins and supplements – some of them may negatively affect your other medications. Dr. Julie Silver offers a list of the most common supplements that interact with medications.
If you see flashing lights or floating objects in your visual fields, see an ophthalmologist right away. Dr. Jackie Griffiths explains why the symptoms of retinal detachment can be quite ominous.
Are you about to have surgery? Dr. Jim Herndon suggests some questions to ask your surgeon before and after the operation.
Don’t be shy about asking for help when you have cancer. Dr. Heinz-Josef Lenz highlights some great advice from the Colon Cancer Alliance.
Looking for ways to enhance your sex life? Mira Kirshenbaum has some creative suggestions.
Do you have diabetes? Exercise might be the most important “treatment” for type 2 diabetes. Dr. Jim Hill explains.
Did you know?
Fertility decreases by 5% for every 1 point increment in BMI over 29. That means that getting pregnant becomes more and more difficult as you gain weight! Dr. Mark Perloe explains.
Men can suffer from post-vasectomy pain. Dr. Joe Scherger describes this problem and what to do about it.
Could having children increase a man’s risk for prostate cancer? Dr. Mike Glode reviews the evidence.
Your brain needs sleep to recharge its neurotransmitters. Dr. Steve Poceta explains the exact reasons why sleep is so important for the health of the human brain.
Approximately 1 in 25 children will have at least one febrile seizure in their lifetime. Dr. Olajide Williams explains that a seizure that occurs during a time of fever does not mean a child has epilepsy.
Siestas and/or power naps could reduce your risk of heart disease. Dr. Joe Scherger highly recommends this regular form of stress reduction.
There are fat zip codes and skinny zip codes. Dr. Jim Hill explains why thinner people congregate in certain places. Think upper east side, Manhattan!
A recent study suggests that calcium supplements may put older women at higher risk for heart attacks. Dr. Jim Herndon explains why he’s skeptical of this potential link.
Medicare will not pay for in-hospital complications believed to be due to errors. Kelly Close wonders how they know for sure that an adverse outcome is related to an actual error or not.
Do you know someone who engages in repetitive, jerky movements? Dr. Olajide Williams is a neurologist who explains what “tics” are and what can be done about them.
Around the globe
China: How many autism experts are there in China? About 30 for 1.3 billion people. Robin Morris describes how bleak the prospects are for parents of children with autism.
United States: In an outrageous court ruling, a physician was held responsible for the death of a young boy who was run over by a patient (while driving his car) on blood pressure medicines. Dr. Cole Brown wonders how much of a patients’ actions can be blamed on his physician?
Africa: “River blindness” is caused by a parasitic invasion of the eye. These parasites can be killed with a medicine called ivermectin, but apparently the wily larvae have developed a genetic mutation that renders them resistant to the only known medicine that can kill them. Dr. Jackie Griffiths reminds us all how tenuous our antibiotic victory over microbes and parasites really is.
Personal perspectives
Some people use diet coke in their CPAP machines! Dr. Steve Poceta tells the story of how one of his patients preferred this type of humidified air. Not sure what that will do to your lungs…
Ever wonder how to weigh the pro’s and con’s of chemotherapy in a terminally ill patient? Dr. Mike Rabow describes how he advises patients about this difficult decision.
Dr. Rabow describes some tear jerking true stories from a hospice in Florida.
From the blogosphere at large: this week’s grand rounds is hosted by Alvaro Fernandez at SharpBrains.com. The theme is: briefing the next US president on healthcare. Some really important information in there folks, so go ahead and have a good read!
This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
January 9th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Uncategorized
5 Comments »
I’m so excited and honored to have been nominated – and now selected as a finalist – for the “Best New Medblog, 2007” award! Thank you MedGadget team! If you’d like to vote for me, please go to this page. The winners will be selected based purely on quantity of votes. The polls are open until midnight, January 20th.
I’ve also collected the best posts from 2007 below so you can get an overview of what my blog is like – where else can you join a weight loss group, read weekly round ups of the best posts from medical experts, stay in touch with breaking medical news, and have a generally cathartic experience with true health stories?
The Best “Feel Good” Posts
A Baby’s Life Is Saved – a young mother forces a doctor to reconsider his diagnosis, saving her baby’s life.
Do the Right Thing– a young intern fights to save the life of a patient that everyone else has written off.
The Wounds of Childhood– how I might have made a difference for a little girl who was marginalized.
Medicine: Face-to-Face– the story of how I treated a child for the same injury I had at her age: being mauled by a dog.
Informed Consent and the Animal Guessing Game– my reflection on the emotional side of consenting for a procedure.
Thanks to Surgeons– a heartfelt tribute to the surgeon who saved my life.
Fly the Ball– the life and times of a Pakistani doctor who builds a successful career in the US.
The Best Infuriating Posts
The Last Straw: My Road to a Revolution– the true story of a child with cerebral palsy who died because he was denied a wheelchair part by Medicare.
The Benefit of the Doubt– how my friend was labeled as a drug seeker and mistreated in the ER.
VIP Syndrome: A No-Win Situation – the story of how a young man with “connections” demanded and received inappropriate and expensive medical tests, leaving the doctors holding the bag.
The Case of a Predator in the Hospital– how one drug user managed to game the system, wreaking havoc on her fellow patients.
Don’t Believe Everything You Read in a Medical Chart– the story of how a misdiagnosis resulted in a patient being wrongly labeled as a drug seeker.
The Real Dangers of Pain Medicine – a woman who died of opiate induced constipation.
The Best Sad Posts
The Scream– how a cavalier end-of-life decision destroyed a family member.
The Size of Unhappiness– a reflection on America’s obsession with thinness.
Baking Cookies– that’s all I could do as a doctor in Manhattan on 9/11.
Unencumbered by Prognosis– my dear friend handles her diagnosis of stage 4 colon cancer with optimism and grace.
Alzheimer’s Dementia: A Life Lived In Reverse– the story of my grandmother’s dementia and her slow mental decline.
The Best Humorous Posts
Conversations at the Spa– the true story of my recent trip to a high end spa in California.
Kids Say the Darndest Things– these are some pretty good ones.
The Christmas Miracle– a “miraculous” icicle forms on a Christmas tree and pandemonium ensues.
Medical Haiku– some irreverent poems I created a few years ago.
Is that Your Real Skin?– the silly conversations that arise when you’re really pale.
Dudes– a quick look at how men perceive a new hairstyle.
The “Perfect” Wedding– the story of how my hair was transformed into an alien head on my wedding day.
The Best Healthcare Policy Posts
Why I Worry about a Government Sponsored Single Payer System – previous experience with government rulings make me distrustful of population based healthcare savings initiatives.
Pay for Performance: More Red Tape without Improved Quality of Care – the title pretty much sums this post up.
Are Physician Salaries Too High? – compare them to health insurance and corporate executive salaries.
Concierge Medicine for the Masses?– my physician is part of an “off the grid” movement in healthcare.
Rationing Healthcare and the Emperor’s New Clothes – I take a look at some of the funding allocation decisions being made by the government.
End of Life Care: Healthcare’s Big Ticket Item– I explore some of the high costs of end-of-life care and the ethical dilemmas that rationing it creates.
Posts That Make You Go…Hmmm
My First Day as a Doctor– it was a baptism by fire.
The Great Unveiling– who are we deep down inside?
Night Float in the Hospice– what it feels like to care for the dying.
Dying with Dignity– I refused to practice intubation on a deceased patient as his family members waited for news in the next room.
Face Transplants: Ethical Dilemmas– should they be covered by health insurance?
The Man Who Couldn’t Speak– a strange diagnostic dilemma solved by a doting mom.
The Best High Brow Posts
Cancer: Do We Really Understand It?– a wonderful post by guest blogger Avrum Bluming, questioning if we really do know as much as we think we do about this formidable foe.
Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Critical Review– another wonderful post by Dr. Bluming.
Good Science Makes Bad Television– a series on research methodology and why the public should care about it.
The Power of Magical Thinking– describes how to recognize snake oil salesmen.
What You’ll Learn in Pre-Med Classes– a rant about how irrelevant some of the course work is that is required for admission to medical school.
What the Heck is a Rehab Doc?– the history of my medical specialty: PM&R.
This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
