April 22nd, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Medblogger Shout Outs
5 Comments »
Welcome to Grand Rounds 4.31, Dr. Val’s edition of the weekly rotating carnival of the best of the medical blogosphere. There are many approaches to summarizing submissions to Grand Rounds, and I have chosen one that has never (to my knowledge) been used before.
That’s right – I’m taking my inspiration from the limbic system, and have organized the posts according to the dominant emotion they elicit from readers. And because Dr. Val was one of those annoying medical students who brought 10 different colored highlighters to study class, I will also label some of the posts with the following tagging system (in brackets) to offer advanced readers an additional nuance:
[:-)] = A post that demonstrates literary excellence
[{] = Early bird – an author who got his/her submission in early, which is really convenient for the host(ess)
[:-/] = Naughty – an author who forgot to submit an entry to Grand Rounds but who was included nonetheless
So without further ado, here’s the Grand Rounds that will make you laugh, cry, stomp your feet, and become enlightened in the process.
Amusing
The fun begins with the Clinical Cases and Images Blog, featuring a hilarious blogger “sweat shop” video to illustrate the heart attack-inducing stress that bloggers face on a daily basis. His post is called: “Death by blogging?”
Dr. Rob Lamberts from Musings of a Distractible Mind has some parenting tips (including pole vaulting avoidance strategies) in his post called “The Sins of the Father.”
Happy, the Happy Hospitalist offers his perspective of what it would mean if physician satisfaction surveys (rather than patient satisfaction surveys) mattered.
Allen Roberts of GruntDoc describes how one misspoken word can result in unexpected innuendo.
[:-/] Dr. Wes predicts an upcoming hospital “performance Olympics” after one patient receives a record fast, door-to-balloon cardiac intervention.
Touching
[:-)] Laurie Edwards of A Chronic Dose tells the touching and amusing story of how one sick young girl was ostracized at summer camp – and how new camps designed for chronically ill children are revolutionizing the camping experience. Her post is called, “Summer Camp: Sick Style.”
Barbara Kivowitz, from In Sickness and in Health, describes a husband who knows just the right thing to say in a stressful time. Her post is called “Mars/Venus Who Cares?”
Lisa Emrich, from Brass and Ivory describes what it’s like to experience a relapse of Multiple Sclerosis and an MRI to evaluate the progression of her disease. Her post is called “Surfing the Magnetic Tube.”
Dr. A from Doctor Anonymous wonders if peace and contentment come from accepting one’s lot in life. His post is called, “With Age Comes Happiness?”
Infuriating
ER Nursey relays the tragic story of a baby that died of a preventable illness. His mom decided not to vaccinate him against pertussis and was trying to treat the infection with “natural methods.” Her post is entitled simply: “Whooping Cough.”
[:-/] Abel Pharmboy at Terra Sigillata explains that since 1994, dietary supplements cannot be removed from the market until there is evidence for lack of safety, meaning that consumers must first be harmed before FDA is authorized to intervene. His post is called, “Must People Die Before DSHEA is Repealed?”
[:-/] David Gorski at Science Based Medicine takes a critical look at the claims of a popular alternative medicine practice: colon cleansing. His post is called, “Would You Like a Liver Flush with that Colon Cleanse?”
[:-)] John Crippen from NHS Blog Doctor explores the difference between a young doctor’s “gallows humor” and a senior physician’s deep and abiding concern for patients in this reflection on death certificates in Britain. The post is called “Ash Cash.”
A Canadian Medical Student and author of Vitum Medicinus tells the story of how a patient asked her doctor a question that she already knew the answer to, just to see if he was current in his knowledge of recent health news. The post is “What Trickery Is This?”
David Williams of The Health Business Blog points out the fallacies inherent in one writer’s attempt to vilify the health insurance industry. His post is called, “There is no Health Insurance Mafia.”
Enlightening
This large group of posts may be further organized by the topic of enlightenment. First up we have practical health tips.
Health Tips
[{] We begin this section with an anonymous psychiatrist blogger at How to Cope with Pain. She has captured my little Rehabilitation Medicine heart with her three-part series describing office ergonomics, therapeutic exercises, and how to avoid computer-induced postural strain. Her very practical post (that will be very useful to you readers) is called: “How to Sit at Your Computer to Avoid Pain.”
Ramona Bates at Suture for a Living explains what to do if you’re bitten by a cat – she does a wonderful job describing the treatment options and possible infections that can result. Her post is aptly named, “Cat Bites.”
Paul Auerbach at Medicine for the Outdoors teaches us everything we need to know about preventing and treating foot blisters caused by hiking/walking. His post has the shortest name of this Grand Rounds: “Blisters.”
Jeff Benabio at The Derm Blog offers a comprehensive analysis of the dangers of tanning salons with some tips for safe sun exposure. His post is called, “Is The Tanning Industry The New Big Tobacco?”
Nancy Brown at Teen Health 411 warns that outdoor tanning is also not safe. Her post is called “Sun Safety.”
Jolie Bookspan, The Fitness Fixer, tells the story of how a woman living in the Yukon learned that “doing exercises” doesn’t heal an injury if you go back to bad movement habits the rest of the day. The post is called, “Fixing Herniated Disk and Reclaiming Active Life.”
[:-/] TBTAM at The Blog That Ate Manhattan has practical tips for patients preparing for a new patient visit with an Ob/Gyn. Her post is called: “TBTAM’s Healthcare Team Tips for New Players.”
[:-/] Dr. David at Musings of a Pediatric Oncologist teaches us that HPV can predispose people to oral and throat cancers as well as cervical cancer. All the more reason to vaccinate boys as well as girls. His post: “HPV and Cancer Revisited.”
Kenneth Trofatter, at Fruit of the Womb offers a detailed analysis of when it might be appropriate to use Fondaparinux to reduce the risk of clotting in pregnant women. His post: “Use of Fondaparinux During Pregnancy.”
Joshua Schwimmer at Tech Medicine offers some tips for doctors. Practice makes perfect, and this new teaching mannequin has some nifty bells and whistles. His post is: “The iStan Medical Mannequin: it Sweats, Bleeds, and Breathes.”
More healthcare for dummies is offered by Jan Gurley of Doc Gurley Blog. Her post is called: “Playing Surgeon.”
Next up, a series of posts about Web 2.0 principles.
Web 2.0
Allergy Notes describes a small study in the BMJ demonstrating that text message reminders can improve compliance with asthma medication regimens. The post is called, “Text Messaging Can Help Young People Manage Asthma.”
[{] Sam Solomon of Canadian Medicine describes a new trend in Canadian medical research – using blog tools to analyze public opinion. His post is called, “Putting Clinical Depression under the Microscope and on the Blogosphere.”
Mic Agbayani at GeekyDoc, suggests that patient privacy is violated by YouTube when a video is posted of healthcare professionals laughing during a surgical procedure to remove a foreign body from the rectum. His post is called, “Patient privacy and YouTube.”
[:-/] Richard Reece at Med Innovation Blog explains that doctors get a bad rap when it comes to EMRs and IT in general. See his post: “Bad Rap on Physician IT Use Not Deserved.”
[:-/] A counter-point argument for the mandatory use of EMRs (at his hospital) is made by John Halamka at Geek Doctor. His post is called: “Accelerating Electronic Health Record Adoption.”
Health Policy and Medical Ethics
This is our largest and final subgroup of enlightening posts. You’ll find some great reasoning here (and Dr. Val is partial to reason).
First up we have the inimitable Sandy Szwarc of Junk Food Science. She takes a close look at the numbers and shows that the current Student Nutrition Policy Initiative is failing to stem the tide of childhood obesity and poor eating habits. Her post is called, “JFS Special Report: Major Findings on Childhood Obesity Programs.”
Amy Tenderich at Diabetes Mine has a terrific post about the need to revise the Americans With Disabilities Act. As a physiatrist, I cheer her on. Her post: “Disability and Diabetes Revisited.”
[:-/] Dr. Rich at The Covert Rationing Blog explains the financial incentives behind Medicare’s new “never event” initiative and how it will impact care for the elderly, obese, and those with bleeding disorders. His post is called, “Never Events? Never Mind.”
Bob Coffield at Health Care Law Blog writes that some argue that preventing disease does not decrease health costs. Bob disagrees, but isn’t sure if he can prove his case. His post: “Is prevention cheaper than treatment?”
[:-/] #1 Dinosaur of Musings of a Dinosaur explains that reducing expenditures in a patient’s last year of life requires perfect foresight into his or her life expectancy. His post: “End of Life Care Costs: A Logical Fallacy.”
Maurice Bernstein at the Bioethics Discussion Blog argues that, over the past 50 years, the ethics of medicine has changed more than any other aspect of it. Technological advances and the advent of medical consumerism have changed the way medicine is practiced. His post is: “50 Years of Medical Practice: Changes, Benefits, Costs, Dilemmas.”
Louise Norris at the Colorado Health Insurance Insider would rather be treated by a salaried physician who has no incentive to order additional and perhaps unnecessary tests and treatments. Her post: “More Care Does Not Mean Better Care.”
[:-/] Charlie Baker at Let’s Talk Healthcare offers a nice summary of a recent NEJM article about how to cut healthcare costs in the US. See his post: “Partners HealthCare Weighs In On Health Care Costs.”
[:-/] Kevin Pho at KevinMD has a series of posts called “My Take.” This one on legitimate malpractice lawsuits and anti-aging is very interesting.
Kerri Morrone at Six Until Me raises her voice for Type 1 Diabetes awareness. Her post: “My Raised Voice.”
[{] Ian Furst from Wait Time and Delayed Care wonders if visual cues could be developed to reduce patient wait times. His post is called, “Clutter of the Brain.”
And finally, an anonymous medical student at a blog called From Medskool argues that there is no primary care shortage, that incomes are fine, and that PCPs won’t abandon Medicare. Anyone wish to debate this with him? His post: “Four Myths of the Primary Care Crisis.”
***
And here’s a special message from next week’s Grand Rounds hostess, Jan Gurley:
Grand Rounds in medicine often means a morgue-cold auditorium, a sea of starched white coats, and staccato squeaks from irritable chairs. Doc Gurley is hosting April 29th’s Grand Rounds of the medical blogosphere with a more WWF-type approach: Grand Rounds Smack Down Week. Do you want to take on a behemoth topic with some chest-beating frenzy? Or just climb into the Internet ring wearing your most outrageous verbal-costume? Here’s your chance to go for it.
Thanks to all who sent me submissions, and many thanks to Nick Genes our fearless leader. Let me know how this Grand Rounds made you FEEL!This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
March 11th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Uncategorized
4 Comments »
As many of my faithful readers know, Dr. Val is a big fan of Web 2.0 principles (blogging, online communities, wikis, forums, chats, podcasts, etc.) I’m even leading a weight loss group online, and there are almost 1400 members already. Although I’ve been trying hard to lead by example, I’ve had occasional hiccups in my own weight loss due to the sweet lure of fine dining. Could YOU resist silky, black sesame panna cotta with butter crunch tuile and spicy cranberry compote? Well maybe you could. For me, resistance is futile.
But I digress.
What I really wanted to point out (before my thoughts were derailed by deliciousness), is that research is now confirming what many of us bloggers have known instinctively: social networking can improve the health care experience. In the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, post operative pain and length of stay were reduced for those who had more social support. This means that the more frequent and broad your social contacts, the less likely you are to be bothered by pain, and the more likely you are to get out of the hospital faster. Let’s hear it for using CarePages, FaceBook, and other online support groups while in the hospital, and perhaps as outpatients as well.
And if feeling supported isn’t enough to get you on the right track, more research in the Archives of Internal Medicine suggests that mail reminders can improve post-heart attack medication compliance. Perhaps email reminders would work just as well (and kill fewer trees?) One thing is for sure – Health 2.0 tools can make an impact on peoples lives and I’m excited to be a part of that.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
March 10th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in News, Opinion
2 Comments »
When I eat out at a restaurant I’m inevitably asked whether or not I’d like bottled water with my meal. My answer usually depends upon the city I’m in – New York water tastes great, so I ask for tap water in Manhattan. The water in DC tastes like a swimming pool (at best), so I usually order bottled water at Washington restaurants.
But little did I realize that the water I’ve been drinking (whether from DC, NY or even from the bottle) has small traces of pharmaceutical chemicals in it. A new investigation conducted by the Associated Press suggests that most major urban water supplies are laced with tiny amounts of prescription drugs. How do the drugs get in the water supply?
Remember that water cycle you (or your kids) studied in grade school? Well, the “underground phase” is where the action happens. Drugs that we swallow pass through our bodies and some is released in our urine and stool. We flush that down the toilet and the fluid debris is treated in a sewage plant and then the water portion is released back into the water supply. Sewage plants and water filters are not designed to remove trace chemicals like heart medicines and anti-depressants, so they remain in the drinking water. Kind of disturbing, right?
Well, the good news (if there is any) is that the amounts of chemicals in the water are pretty small – we’re talking parts per trillion. Just to put that in perspective, that’s more than 1000 times smaller than the minimum amount needed for therapeutic effect from the fluoride added to the water system. And the concentration is far below the therapeutic threshold in the bloodstream for these drugs. But how do we know that tiny amounts of drug exposure isn’t harmful in some cumulative way?
Research into the potential long term effects of these chemicals in the water supply has focussed mostly upon the presence or absence of the drugs, and the concentrations at which they’re present. Animal studies (such as the “feminization” of fish exposed to environmental estrogens) and cell culture research suggest that exposure to larger concentrations of these drugs can cause negative outcomes, but to my knowledge there are no long term studies of the potential impact of very small concentrations on human health. But before we become outraged at this apparent lack of investigation, let’s think about why it’s so difficult to gather this kind of information.
First of all, concentration-wise, pharmaceuticals represent a small fraction of the thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment, including everything from pesticides to personal care products. So it’s very difficult to prove a cause and effect for any one drug’s influence – we are each exposed to a very dilute cocktail of chemicals in our daily lives, whether through the water we drink, the food we eat, or the air we breathe. How can we tease out the potential damage of one chemical over another?
Secondly, it’s pretty likely that any potential harm (from chemicals at such small doses) would take many years of exposure before a clinically measurable threshold is reached. It’s very difficult and expensive to study large groups of people over time – and it’s hard to know what their lifestyle choices may contribute to their overall chemical exposure. Over time people change jobs, change what they eat or drink, change where they live… the complex interplay of environmental factors make it hard to interpret exposures and effects.
And finally, how do we know what outcomes to look at? It’s possible that these small doses of pharmaceutical products could affect our bodies in fairly subtle ways – which again makes it difficult to measure. It’s hard enough to study cancer rates in populations, but how would we study differences in physical or mental performance? Or slight changes in mood or heart function?
Since there’s no easy way to prove a connection between drugs in our water system and our general health and wellbeing, we are likely to be left with far more questions than answers. I think we all agree that we’d rather not be exposed to trace amounts of any chemicals in our water supply, but unfortunately the cost of filtering all potential contaminants from the water is exceedingly high. Reverse osmosis (a process currently used to reclaim fresh water from the sea) can cost as much as $1-18/gallon depending on the system in place and the country using it. While reverse osmosis could guarantee a chemical-free drinking water supply, we couldn’t afford to supply it to all Americans. And in the end, it’s still unclear if solving that part of the puzzle would improve our overall health.
I hope that we’ll find ways to reduce the chemical load on our environment, and that advanced water purification technology will become more affordable in the future. Unfortunately, trace amounts of chemicals, drugs, and pesticides are more ubiquitous than we’d like to believe. The impact they may have on our health is difficult to measure, and largely unknown at this point. Perhaps the bottom line is that we’re all connected to one another through our environment – so that granny’s heart medicines may yet live on (albeit in trace amounts) in your bottled water. All the more reason for Americans to pull together to live healthy lifestyles, control our weight, and try to prevent the diseases that are requiring all these drugs in the first place.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
February 24th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Book Reviews, Health Policy
5 Comments »
Dr. Richard Fogoros wrote a fascinating book called Fixing American Healthcare: Wonkonians, Gekkonians, and the Grand Unification Theory of Healthcare. In the first two thirds of the book, he explains why our healthcare system is broken, and describes its dysfunction with exasperating accuracy.
One of the most important concepts in his book is that of “covert rationing.” As Dr. Rich explains, we Americans cling to two fundamental beliefs:
1. Everything that can be done for a sick person must be done, as long as there’s some small hope of beneficial outcome. (The belief in no spending limits).
2. Healthcare is an entitlement for all Americans. (The belief in universal access).
Since science and technology have provided us with incredible (and expensive) advances over the last several decades, doing all that’s possible for all who are sick is simply not financially possible. However, Americans are fundamentally opposed to rationing care, so the rationing occurs covertly, including cost-savings achieved by people being uninsured, by certain chemo drugs not being covered by Medicare, by physicians being coerced by HMOs to ration care, and countless other subtle and capricious ways.
Covert rationing is a little recognized but fundamental flaw of the current healthcare system, and it results in untold inequities in care. Dr. Rich believes that a fair system requires open rationing of resources, with rules agreed upon by tax payers. Would you agree?
In my next post I’ll discuss Dr. Rich’s thoughts on what’s really driving up healthcare costs…This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
February 2nd, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Opinion
No Comments »
I must have a really trustworthy face. No matter where I go, absolute strangers ask me for directions, they request that I watch their belongings, hold their place in line, they even ask me to help with their kids. I am continually astonished by the uninvited inquiries that I receive walking down the street, on the train, or even in foreign countries. I guess people think I’m both harmless and likely to know how to help them. They are right about the first part, and not quite as right about the second.
Just a couple of days ago I was settling into a train seat when the woman in front of me peaked over the head rest and asked if I’d mind watching her bags while she left to go to the restroom. I happily agreed to do so, wondering what I’d actually do if someone tried to take her bag. And as I mused about how on earth I’d won her absolute confidence without even making eye contact, I began to think about the idea of trust. How do patients decide whom they trust with their medical care?
I’d like to think that trust is earned – and many times it is – but there’s also something more primitive about it than that. Without knowing a person for long enough to judge his or her character, we often draw conclusions nonetheless. How successful are we at these snap decisions? Well, we might be quite good at it. I was amused to find an online test where you may judge the sincerity of a person’s smile just by looking at a 4 second video clip. Some of the models were asked to smile convincingly, and others were told a joke or were caused to laugh by some genuine means. Most people figure out which smile is contrived and which is natural most of the time. See how you do.
And so, when it comes to finding a primary care physician, or a doctor that you trust with your medical care, should you rely on your gut instincts or is there a better way to assess their competency?
I’ve wrestled with the idea of online physician ratings for a couple of years. Part of me thinks that it’s impossible to capture all the qualities of a good physician in some simplified form filled out by non-medical professionals. But another part of me wonders if a large collection of different experiences might add up to an opinion trend that’s on the mark. Whether or not you’re a fan of physician ratings, they are here to stay. Perhaps the best we can do is offer as many ratings as possible so that the average might provide high level, helpful information. Revolution Health has a free physician rating tool. Check it out.
How do you know whom to trust? Do you rely on your instincts or the referral of someone you know? Would online physician ratings be helpful, harmful, or simply limited in their utility?
Let me know… and if you see me on the street, yes, I’d be happy to watch your bags.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
