April 13th, 2011 by Dinah Miller, M.D. in Health Tips, Opinion
Tags: Empathy, How Do You Know If Your Therapist Is good?, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, What Makes A Good Therapist?
No Comments »




This is for Dr. D.
We were having lunch when Dr. D mentioned she wanted to write a book aimed at teaching residents how to
do psychotherapy. It would start with a section on What Makes a Good Therapist? What does she thinks makes a good therapist? Real life experiences which impart an ability to empathize. Do we grow from our own difficulties? More specifically, do we grow in to better therapists? I asked another shrink this, and he said that people like to believe there is some meaning to their suffering, and perhaps it’s nice to believe that if you’ve been stuck suffering, then it makes you a better therapist, but he wasn’t so convinced it was true. Me? I don’t know, maybe. Or maybe not. Personally, I’m fine with the idea of not suffering, at all, ever again, so long as I live.
In residency, I was taught that warmth and empathy are important to being a good therapist. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Shrink Rap*
April 12th, 2011 by Peggy Polaneczky, M.D. in Health Tips, Research
Tags: Blood Clots, Breast Cancer, Heart Disease, Hormone Replacement Therapy, HRT, Should You Take HRT, Summary, WHI, Women's Health Initiative
1 Comment »

This is the study that doesn’t end…
The longterm follow up extends…
Some people started studying hormones in menopause,
And they’ll continue publishing more data just because…
(repeat)
In yet another paper in a major journal, we hear once more from the investigators of the Women’s Health Initiative. This time it’s the long term outcomes of women who took estrogen alone, now seven years out from stopping their hormones. What new information can we learn from this extensive analysis of new data?
Nothing.
Really.
The WHI’s been telling us the same thing about ERT (Estrogen replacement therapy) and HRT (Combination estrogen/progestin therapy) since 2002, and all each subsequent study does is reinforce and expand on that initial data. Unfortunately, it will probably take a few more papers before some folks accept the results of this important study, which, though flawed, continues to inform the practice of menopausal medicine.
Allow me to summarize what we know – Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at The Blog That Ate Manhattan*
April 10th, 2011 by ChristopherChangMD in Health Tips, Research
Tags: Allergy, Asthma, Density, Development, ENT, Nasal Hair, Otolaryngology, Protective Effect, Risk
2 Comments »

Researchers in Turkey found that there is an association between nasal hair density and risk of asthma developing in patients with seasonal rhinitis patients. No joke… They published their findings in the International Archives of Allergy and Immunology in March 2011.
The rate of asthma found in patients with little or no nasal hair was 44.7% whereas only 16.7% of patients with a dense forest of nasal hair had asthma.
They hypothesize that increased nasal hair improves allergen filtration thereby preventing the allergens from irritating the airway. The assumption here being that allergen irritation of the airway can potentially cause asthma.
IF this is true (and that’s a big if)… patients with allergies should be encouraged to grow nice thick nasal hair to prevent future asthma!
Read the research abstract here!
Reference:
Does Nasal Hair (Vibrissae) Density Affect the Risk of Developing Asthma in Patients with Seasonal Rhinitis? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011 Mar 30;156(1):75-80
*This blog post was originally published at Fauquier ENT Blog*
April 10th, 2011 by PeterWehrwein in Health Policy, Health Tips
Tags: Baseball, Bats, Children's Health, College Baseball, Head Injuries, Non-wood bats, Pediatrics, Pitch speed, Prevention, Rules, Safety
No Comments »


Opening Day, the first day of the 2011 major league baseball season, was March 31st. The first pitch was thrown a little after 1 p.m., and sometime after that baseball fans heard the first crack of the bat of a brand-new season.
Even nonfans can rejoice at this sign of spring, and a promise that summer days are ahead.
But you won’t hear the crack of the bat very much these days from other diamonds—Little League, high school, and college. It has been replaced by pings and thunks as most players at those levels now use metal bats or composite ones, which that are made with a mixture of materials, including graphite.
Players started using metal (usually aluminum) bats about 30 years ago. They last longer than wooden bats and send the ball farther. The composite models have come on strong more recently.
But there’s growing concern that nonwood bats may pose a safety hazard to fielders—especially pitchers— because they make a hit baseball go faster. The added speed gives fielders less time to react and, if they are hit, increases their risk of injury. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Harvard Health Blog*
April 9th, 2011 by Happy Hospitalist in Health Tips, Opinion
Tags: Clean Catch, Diagnosis, Internal Medicine, Straight Catheterization, Urinalysis, UTI
No Comments »

After eight years of hospitalist medicine and seeing inaccurate urinalysis results day after day, year after year, I’ve come to the conclusion that the straight cath vs clean catch debate is not a debate. If the urine didn’t come from a straight cath, I have zero faith in the accuracy of the results.
I know, I know. It takes time and effort for a nurse to perform the straight cath. It’s not comfortable for the patient to have a catheter inserted into their urethra. Plus, with bad nursing technique, one could introduce bacteria into the bladder when performing a straight cath urinalysis.
All that aside, if I’m a physician trying to make medical decisions based on accurate data, then having bad urine results that don’t represent the true picture is worse than not having any data at all. For example, here’s a classic case of what I have to deal with day in and day out when trying to make medical decisions on my patients. Below is a snap shot of three UA results obtained from Happy’s ER over two visits. I’m sure it’s the same no matter where you get your care in this country. The first two urinalysis results came from a clean catch sample of a horribly weak 89 year old female who presented with family complaints of “fever and weakness”, both days. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at The Happy Hospitalist*