April 2nd, 2011 by Jessie Gruman, Ph.D. in Opinion
Tags: Annals Of Internal Medicine, Does Your Doctor Trust You?, Evidence Based Medicine, Gastric Cancer, Patient Engagement, Shared Decision-Making, Trust
No Comments »
Members of the American public are frequently surveyed about their trust in various professionals. Doctors and nurses usually wind up near the top of the list, especially when compared to lawyers, hairdressers and politicians. Trust in professionals is important to us: they possess expertise we lack but need, to solve problems ranging from the serious (illness) to the relatively trivial (appearance).
How much professionals trust us seems irrelevant: our reciprocity is expressed in the form of payment for services rendered or promised, our recommendations to friends and families and repeat appearances.
So I was surprised to read an article in the Annals of Family Medicine describing a new scale to measure doctors’ trust in their patients. This scale, based on input from focus groups and validation surveys of physicians, was developed for research purposes on the grounds that trust is a “feature of the clinician-patient relationship that resonates with both patients and clinicians.” Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at CFAH PPF Blog*
April 1st, 2011 by Debra Gordon in Health Policy, Opinion
Tags: Birthday, Donut Hole, Healthcare reform, Medicare, Obamacare, Pre-Existing Conditions
No Comments »
Who would have thought when we first looked upon you a year ago, barely formed, still somewhat embryonic, that you would have grown so much in just a year, and created so much, well, trouble? Yes, I’m talking about you, health reform. After all, aren’t you the reason for the sea change in Washington? Aren’t you behind several pending appeals that will get to the Supreme Court? Aren’t you the reason that the country is going to hell in a handbasket?
But wait. Let’s look at some other major milestones of the past year.
— You sent $250 checks to Medicare beneficiaries to help cover the “donut hole” in their drug coverage.
— You created special insurance pools designed to provide health care NOW to people with preexisting conditions who can’t get coverage.
— You allowed parents to keep their kids on their health insurance until the children turn 26, providing a major safety net.
— You did away with lifetime caps, enabling those with some serious medical conditions to continue receiving health insurance.
And that’s just in a year. Imagine what the next year and the year after that will bring. So I’ll say it again, Happy Birthday, Healthcare Reform. May you live to a ripe old age and only get better.
*This blog post was originally published at A Medical Writer's Musings on Medicine, Health Care, and the Writing Life*
April 1st, 2011 by Stanley Feld, M.D. in Health Policy, Opinion
Tags: Budget Cuts, Diabetes, Endocrinology, Health Technology Assessment Group, Home Glucose Monitoring, Insurance Coverage, medicaid, Medicare, Obamacare, Primary Care
No Comments »
The larger the bureaucracy the more inefficient a system becomes. Several things can happen in the decision making process.
1. The decision making process can become opaque rather than transparent.
2. Decisions are made by a committee by consensus.
3. Consensus committee decisions might not sharply define the original goals.
4. Blame for errors gets dissipated.
5. Decisions are only as good as the information that is gathered.
6. Changing a wrong decision can be difficult and costly.
President Obama’s healthcare reform law is creating 256 new agencies to gather information and recommend decisions for other agencies to write regulations.
The following decision is being made by an agency in Washington state. It is not only the wrong decision, but is a decision that will set back the care of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 15 or 20 years. It is a decision being made using the wrong information. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Repairing the Healthcare System*
March 31st, 2011 by John Di Saia, M.D. in Opinion
Tags: Breast Reduction, Medicare, Obesity, Plastic Surgery, Reimbursement, Surgery
No Comments »
For years I have avoided Medicare breast reductions for a number of reasons:
(1) Poor pay for hours of work. An average breast reduction when done to a high standard usually takes 3-4 hours. I do not staple the closure.
(2) Medicare patients due to their age are at higher risk for wound healing problems.
(3) 90 day global fee period – These patients routinely need follow-up care and that care is not billable.
Recently I ignored my better judgment and performed the operation for a lady in whom back pain (ICD-9 724.5) and back surgery had been long term problems. She also had a pretty nasty rash (ICD-9 692.89 Dermatitis and eczema [in the infra-mammary fold]) under her right breast that just wouldn’t go away. These of course were all in addition to the usual diagnosis of large breasts (ICD-9 611.1 Hypertrophy of breast.)
Medicare showed me yet another reason for my hesitation to do these cases when they denied payment for the operation saying it was not medically indicated. They will probably pay on appeal, but the thought that I should have to appeal the case adds insult to injury.
*This blog post was originally published at Truth in Cosmetic Surgery*
March 31st, 2011 by Elaine Schattner, M.D. in Opinion
Tags: Communication, Contest, Crowd-Sourcing, Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, Education, Health IT, How Doctors Think, Ideas, New York Times, Privacy
No Comments »
The Times ran an intriguing experiment on its Well blog yesterday: a medical problem-solving contest. The challenge, based on the story of a real girl who lives near Philadelphia, drew 1379 posted comments and closed this morning with publication of the answer.
Dr. Lisa Sanders, who moderated the piece, says today that the first submitted correct response came from a California physician; the second came from a Minnesota woman who is not a physician. Evidently she recognized the condition’s manifestations from her experience working with people who have it.
The public contest – and even the concept of using the word “contest” – to solve a real person’s medical condition interests me a lot. This kind of puzzle is, as far as I know, unprecedented apart from the somewhat removed domains of doctors’ journals and on-line platforms intended for physicians, medical school problem-based learning cases, clinical pathological conferences (CPC’s) and fictional TV shows. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Medical Lessons*
