October 11th, 2011 by Iltifat Husain, M.D. in Opinion
Tags: Apple Products, Build Quality, Cardiology, Commentary, Critical Care, Death, Doctors, Ease of use, iPad, iPhone, Medical Grade, Oncology, Passing, Physicians, Simplicity, Steve Jobs, Uniformity
No Comments »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf006/cf00653b87e87773de7b63dd07db3fd52746503d" alt="iMedicalApps"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e02f9/e02f9c5b548094c1b3d56d7b6d3f9bba5a865aa2" alt="Post image for Three reasons why doctors mourn the passing of Steve Jobs"
Doctors love their Apple Products. Just walk into any hospital ward, and see the types of mobile devices we are using. At weekly Grand Rounds conferences, you see plenty of iPads in use. At physician meetings, the laptop of choice is often the Macbook Pro. The data backs these anecdotal examples as well.
Doctors love their Apple Products – and Steve Jobs was obviously an extension of these products, often times cited as the singular force behind these products, and it’s why physicians who love his products mourn his passing.
There are three specific reasons why :
1) Simplicity
In medicine, we deal with enough complexity. Knowing disease pathology and the mechanism of various illnesses and their treatments is a fascinating exercise, but it’s taxing. For every known in medicine, there are at least five unknowns. It’s what makes being a physician exciting, but stressful as well. We’re always on high alert – especially those of us who practice in the critical care arena.
Juxtaposed to this is Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at iMedicalApps*
October 11th, 2011 by DavedeBronkart in Health Policy, Opinion
Tags: Al Mulley, Center for Advancing Health, CFAH, decision-making, Health Care Professionals, Health Insurance, Health Insurance Premiums, Healthcare Crisis, Increase, Inflation, Jessie Gruman, New York Times, Patient Engagement, Preventive Health Care, SPM, TEDx Dartmouth, Treatment Decisions
No Comments »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d53/a6d532282c67682346e4b29ae7f030a3d445ad01" alt="e-Patients.net"
Last week the New York Times reported that some health insurers have applied to regulatory agencies to push premiums sharply higher – usually double-digit increases, while citizens are suffering. This falls on top of the 11 year history reported last year by the Kaiser Family Foundation: wages and inflation are up ~40%, while health costs and worker contributions were up 138% and 159%:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66579/66579aeeb4c1b088b6f7e34ea226e5030e32bd06" alt="Kaiser Family Foundation slide on care costs Kaiser Family Foundation slide on care costs"
No wonder we feel squeezed. (Last week’s announcement comes on top of this history.)
This has enormous human impact. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at e-Patients.net*
October 11th, 2011 by Berci in Opinion
Tags: Accurate, Artistic, Brain, Creative, Differences, Imagination, Left, Left Brain, Logical, Neurology, Numbers, Order, Right, Right Brain, Science, Scientist
1 Comment »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9128/c9128ecf4acb749b50622cd7ab3504df56f3279c" alt="ScienceRoll"
This is one of the best pictures I’ve ever seen. I’m almost totally a left brain… What about you?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e6f9/2e6f9676a35336ce54ea7b827ad7509692d0d3ca" alt="293390_283697778326071_179865312042652_1126591_1881694902_n"
Left brain: I am the left brain. I am a scientist. A mathematician. I love the familiar. I categorize. I am accurate. Linear. Analytical. Strategic. I am practical. Always in control. A master of words and language. Realistic. I calculate equations and play with numbers. I am order. I am logic. I know exactly who I am.
Right brain: I am the right brain. I am creativity. A free spirit. I am passion. Yearning. Sensuality. I am the sound of roaring laughter. I am taste. The feeling of sand beneath bare feat. I am movement. Vivid colors. I am the urge to paint on an empty canvas. I am boundless imagination. Art. Poetry. I sense. I feel. I am everything I wanted to be.
*This blog post was originally published at ScienceRoll*
October 10th, 2011 by Steve Novella, M.D. in Opinion, Research
Tags: Analysis, Ben Goldcare, Biomedical Research, Cause, Correlation, Errors, Interactions, Legitimate Science, Mainstream Journals, Nature Neuroscience, NeuroLogica, Neuroscience, Pseudoscience, Research, Science and Medicine, Significant Effects, Statistics
No Comments »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c230b/c230b4954284e3a365b0abfb01283c31371a7601" alt="Science-Based Medicine"
While we frequently on SBM target the worst abuses of science in medicine, it’s important to recognize that doing rigorous science is complex and mainstream scientists often fall short of the ideal. In fact, one of the advantages of exploring pseudoscience in medicine is developing a sensitive detector for errors in logic, method, and analysis. Many of the errors we point out in so-called “alternative” medicine also crop up elsewhere in medicine – although usually to a much less degree.
It is not uncommon, for example, for a paper to fail to adjust for multiple analysis – if you compare many variables you have to take that into consideration when doing the statistical analysis, otherwise the probability of a chance correlation will be increased.
I discussed just last week on NeuroLogica the misapplication of meta-analysis – in this case to the question of whether or not CCSVI correlates with multiple sclerosis. I find this very common in the literature, essentially a failure to Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Science-Based Medicine*
October 9th, 2011 by DrWes in Health Policy, Opinion
Tags: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ, America, Expense, health care, Informed Decisions, New England Journal of Medicine, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PCORI, Policy
No Comments »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba358/ba35866328871704bbefe92929837bda9783efc6" alt="Dr. Wes"
If you want to grow the expense of health care delivery in America very quickly, then create two government agencies to do the same job.
From the 28 September 2011 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, we read about a small paragraph in our new health care law that created the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). From that same article, here’s the PCORI’s mission:
PCORI responds to a widespread concern (eds note: emphasis mine. Really? What about the internet?) that, in many cases, patients and their health care providers, families, and caregivers do not have the information they need to make choices aligned with their desired health outcomes.
PCORI funding is set at a total of $210 million for the first 3 years and increases to approximately $350 million in 2013 and $500 million annually from 2014 through 2019. With more than $3 billion to spend between now and the end of the decade, PCORI will support many studies encompassing a broad range of study designs and outcomes that are relevant to patients, aiming to assist people in making choices that are consistent with their values, preferences, and goals.
We should recall that Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Dr. Wes*