May 30th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Expert Interviews, True Stories
No Comments »
Revolution Health expert, Dr. Rafat Abbasi, is a reproductive endocrinologist and fertility specialist in Washington, D.C. She told me this exciting story about a miracle baby that brought great joy to a young family. She hopes that this news will bring hope to other young men and women who have spinal cord injuries and want to have children.
Dr. Val: Tell me about the fertility success story that has you so excited.
Dr. Abbasi: A young couple was referred to me because they wanted to have a baby. They had been married for about a year, and had been through one miscarriage already. Sadly, the young husband (he is about 35 years old) was then involved in a freak mountain biking accident and broke his neck, severing his spinal cord. He was paralyzed from the neck down and confined to a wheelchair, unable to function sexually. His 29 year old wife and he were devastated.
They came to me wondering if there was any way that they could get pregnant under the current circumstances. And due to the amazing advances in fertility treatments, I was pleased to report to them that there was a chance that they could. I explained how we’d do it.
First we had to collect some sperm from the testes of the husband. We could do this by using an electric current to stimulate a spontaneous ejaculation reflex and then inseminate the wife with the fluid, or if that didn’t work, we could withdraw some immature sperm directly from the testes with a needle. I explained that if we retrieved the sperm with a needle we’d need to mature the sperm in a test tube incubator overnight, and retrieve eggs from her and then use in-vitro fertilization techniques to create embryos to implant into her womb. In order to get the eggs, we’d need to use egg-stimulating hormones (for about 10-12 days) and an ultrasound-guided needle retrieval technique (under local anesthesia).
As it turns out, we used the second method for this couple. We transferred three embryos and one of them took, and she gave birth to a beautiful baby girl. The couple is now interested in having a second baby.
Dr. Val: Isn’t it true that spinal cord injury can contribute to infertility? How does that work?
Dr. Abbasi: Over time, men who’ve had a spinal cord injury suffer from testicular atrophy which affects their hormone levels and can make it much more difficult to retrieve viable sperm. Fertility rates start to decrease substantially 5-7 years after a spinal cord injury.
Dr. Val: What made this story touching for you?
Dr. Abbasi: I think the whole story is incredibly touching because this young man, who was in the prime of his life, had a freak accident that took away his hope of ever having kids. His rehabilitation medicine physician thought to refer him to a fertility specialist (because he’d heard about the technique we use to retrieve sperm from patients who’ve had spinal cord injuries) and now he’s blessed with a family. Until then he mistakenly believed that there was no hope for a pregnancy after his injury. His life is different now due to his physical limitations, but he is full of joy because of his baby daughter. It gives me goose bumps just thinking about it.
To listen to the full interview (with a step-by-step clinical account of how the fertility procedure was managed), click here.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
May 5th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Health Policy, Health Tips
1 Comment »
Do you know your state’s momScore? Revolution Health and I have teamed up with leading medical experts and mommy bloggers to create a new health index just in time for Mother’s Day: the momScore.
Check out this fun interactive map that ranks states by 10 key maternal health variables*:
- Access to prenatal care
- Availability of childcare services
- Number of insured moms
- Maternal mortality
- Affordability of childrens’ health insurance
- Air quality
- Family paid leave policy
- Infant mortality
- Risk of pregnancy complications
- Violent crime rate
We also created a combined average of these variables (weighted according to expert perceived importance) to get an overall ranking. So, do you know where it’s best to be a mom in the United States?
Apparently, Vermont ranks most favorably (on average) in all of these variables. Don’t live in Vermont? Check out how your state compares.
Would you like to discuss your state’s rankings with others or debate the momScore? You can post your comments in our interactive momScore community. This is a really exciting opportunity to discuss women’s health issues in a fresh new way. I hope that the momScore will challenge states to strengthen their efforts to keep moms and babies healthy. At the very least, we’ve made a lot of Vermonters quite smug.
*Variables are based on state reporting to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the United States Census Bureau, as well as leading non-profit organizations such as the Kaiser Family Foundation and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. For more information about momScore methodology, click here.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
March 5th, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Expert Interviews, News
2 Comments »
This is a cute story that caught my eye – a couple used in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to become pregnant, and they specifically asked their doctor to implant only one embryo to make sure that they did not have multiple births. In the end, that one embryo split twice, causing identical triplets to grow inside the uterus. All three baby boys were born healthy at 35 weeks gestation.
I asked Revolution Health fertility expert, Dr. Rani Abbasi, to help me to understand if there was any greater risk of twinning in the IVF process. Interestingly, there are some new techniques used to help insure implantation of embryos that can also increase the chances of identical twins forming. I don’t know if this couple’s doctor used either technique, but I thought I’d explain them to you because the MSNBC report might lead you to believe that this event was extremely rare (they quote 200 million to one) when in fact it may not be quite THAT rare.
There are two methods that fertility specialists can use to increase the chances of implantation for a single embryo. First, incubating the embryo in an extended culture (for 5 days rather than the usual 3) makes it more likely that the transfer will implant in the uterus. However, since the embryo is two days older at the time of transfer, it has a higher likelihood of splitting into two, causing identical twins.
Second, some fertility experts use a technique called “assisted hatching” which also improves the likelihood of implantation of an embryo. This involves making a small nick in the embryo’s outer zone (I think of it as an egg shell) to facilitate the cells breaking out of the protective outer coating and implanting in the uterine wall. When the nick is made, it is also possible for a single cell to fall out (rather than the group of cells, called a blastocyst, exiting together) and become its own fetus.
So ultimately, it’s possible that the techniques used by this couple’s doctor to insure a successful implantation of one embryo increased the chance of splitting of that same embryo, resulting in triplets. Granted, the chance of this happening is still rare – and it’s ironic since the couple was doing all they could to avoid twins or triplets – but it’s not nearly as rare as the chance of a random woman having identical triplets outside of IVF.
For more information about twins and triplets, check out my recent podcast interview with pregnancy expert Dr. Mary D’Alton. And for those of you who believe that you can control your destiny, this story should give you pause!This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
March 1st, 2008 by Dr. Val Jones in Humor
2 Comments »
This is one of the funniest SNL skits I’ve seen in a long time (hat tip to KevinMD). It’s a spoof drug commercial about a birth control pill that allows women to have their period once a year. Enjoy!This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
October 18th, 2007 by Dr. Val Jones in News, Opinion
5 Comments »
You might have seen the recent news about the middle school in Maine – King Middle School, in the Portland school district – that is planning to provide birth control to pre-teens, without requiring explicit parental consent. School officials argue that this will help to prevent pre-teen pregnancies, and estimate that at least 5 out of 135 of their 11- to 13-year-old female students are sexually active already.
While I absolutely sympathize with the desire to avoid pre-teen pregnancies, and I do understand that there is a reality here that some very young children will become sexually active at the tender age of 11, I personally do not support giving pre-pubescent girls hormone-altering tablets. We do not have good studies demonstrating the safety of such therapies in children, and until we do it’s just not medically sound to be offering this treatment. (For example, we don’t know what extra estrogen does to early breast buds, or whether there’s an increased risk for developing breast cancer later on.)
I also think that 11 year olds are not physically and emotionally prepared for sexual intimacy – and the prematurity of this event could be quite harmful for their psyche. We know that 11- and 12-year-old brains are not fully developed to think the way adults do, so there’s really no telling what impact it could have or what long term psychological effects might result.
Apparently sex before the age of 14 is illegal in Maine, so (although there’s no doubt that it may happen prior to that age) it seems that the state’s legal system is not in step with their school system, and that needs to be looked at. It is inconsistent to claim that an activity is illegal for children and then enable it with tax dollars.
I suppose that education about the use of condoms and access to them (without aggressive promotion of them) may be acceptable at this age. After all, condoms can prevent STDs and don’t have medical effects on the body as a whole. But my plea is that parents take the lead here – and educate your children about the risks of STDs, pregnancy, and the emotional damage that premature sex can have on a young person. Advocate for abstinence as a first choice, explain that condoms are non-negotiable, and try to help them turn their focus away from sex and towards more age-appropriate endeavors.
A new Dove advertising campaign asks parents to talk to their kids before the beauty industry does, and I think the same goes for sex and the media. Today’s parent must launch a preemptive strike against the over-sexualization of children, or risk having their 11 year olds taking estrogen patches from a school nurse without their consent.This post originally appeared on Dr. Val’s blog at RevolutionHealth.com.
