November 14th, 2010 by DrWes in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Health Tips, Medical Art, News, Opinion
Tags: Cardiopulmonology, Cigarette Labels, Dangers Of Smoking, Dr. Wes Fisher, Family Medicine, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, General Medicine, Health Risks Of Smoking, Internal Medicine, Oncology, Patient Education, Primary Care, Public Awareness, Public Health, Quitting Smoking, smoking cessation, Stop Smoking, Tobacco Products
No Comments »
The FDA will soon require new cigarette package labeling to deter smoking. So in politically-correct governmental fashion, they are asking which labels you’d like to see. (You can pick your favorites here.) My personal favorite (so far) is the one shown to the left, but its impact factor pales in comparison to this example found in England. (That, my friends, is cancer!)
Ironically, it appears the FDA isn’t too sure how forceful it should be in these warnings about the dangers of smoking. They offer a cornucopia of milquetoast labeling options, many of which contain cartoons. Might such unrealistic portrayals defy they hard-hitting message they want to project? Worse, at least one cartoon (seen here) even seems to promote cigarettes AND drug use together!
In an even more astonishing example, some images almost make me what to take up smoking so I can blow big bubbles. Since I could never do this well before, maybe I should take up smoking! Seriously, is an empowerment message what the government wants to portray?
Make these labels big, ugly, and real. Anything else is a waste of taxpayer’s money.
-WesMusings of a cardiologist and cardiac electrophysiologist.
*This blog post was originally published at Dr. Wes*
November 14th, 2010 by DrCharles in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion
Tags: Crying Spells, Depression, Emotional Health, Emotional Stability, Emotional Well-Being, Healthcare Politics, John Boehner, Leadership, Mental Health, Mental Illness, Psychiatry and Psychology, Psychological Health, The Examining Room of Dr. Charles, The New York Times
3 Comments »
When the Republicans took back the House of Representatives [recently], John Boehner, the presumptive new Speaker and current Senator from Ohio, unleashed a “sob heard round the world.” As The New York Times quotes:
“I’ve spent my whole life chasing the American dream,” (Boehner) said, beginning to cry. He swallowed and tried again. But describing all the bad jobs he had once led to near sobbing when he got to the line, “I poured my heart and soul into running a small business.”
Boehner has cried in public many other times, the recent election night being only the largest stage to date. The tears also flow at his annual golf tournament, or while watching a child pledge allegiance to the flag, listening to a Republican colleague speak about his Vietnam War experiences, the unveiling of a statue of Ronald Reagan, while accepting various awards, during a rendition of “America the Beautiful,” etc. Could these tears be signs of major depression? Should melancholy be a disqualification for leadership? Were Clinton’s tears any better? Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at The Examining Room of Dr. Charles*
November 14th, 2010 by Davis Liu, M.D. in Better Health Network, News, Opinion, Research
Tags: Blood Tests, Cleveland Clinic, Doctor-Patient Communication, Dr. Davis Liu, Family Health History, Family Medical History, Family Medicine, General Medicine, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Imaging Studies, Internal Medicine, Lab Tests, Medical History Form, Overtesting, Patient Resume, Patient's Social History, Primary Care, Saving Money and Surviving the Healthcare Crisis, Talking to Patients, Too Much Testing
No Comments »
The Associated Press ran a provocatively-titled piece recently, “Family health history: ‘best kept secret’ in care”, which noted how a geneticist at the Cleveland Clinic discovered that asking about family members and their history of breast, colon, or prostate cancer was better than simply doing genetic blood testing.
Surprising? Hardly. This is what all medical students are taught. Talk to the patient. Get a detailed history and physical. Lab work and imaging studies are merely tools that can help support or refute a diagnosis. They provide a piece of the puzzle, but always must be considered in the full context of a patient. They alone do not provide the truth. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Saving Money and Surviving the Healthcare Crisis*
November 13th, 2010 by Medgadget in Better Health Network, Health Tips, News, Research
Tags: Computer Safety, Fertility and Sterility, Laptop Heat, Male Laptop Users, Medgadget, Men's Health, Personal Technology and Health, Preventive Health, Preventive Medicine, Reproductive Health, Scrotal Hyperthermia, Scrotal Temperature, Testicles
No Comments »
Male readers be advised! Using your laptop placed on your knees to read this post may cause your testicles to heat up quite significantly. However surprisingly, this is not due to the heat dissipated by many laptops, but rather due to the positioning of the legs. A study just published online in the journal Fertility and Sterility investigated ways to avoid the testicles from overheating while using a laptop computer.
Right and left scrotal temperatures were measured in 29 volunteers while working on the laptop in different positions: With closely approximated legs, with closely approximated legs with a lap pad below the laptop, and sitting with legs apart at a 70° angle with a lap pad below the laptop. After 60 minutes with closed legs, temperature increased about 2.4 degrees Celsius, using the lap pad yielded a slightly smaller increase of 2.1 degrees, while spreading the legs resulted in a modest increase of 1.4 degrees.
The authors conclude that prevention of scrotal hyperthermia in laptop users is not feasible, although we would like to disagree and suggest using a flat surface, such as a table or desk, to position your laptop in order to preserve your fertility.
Article abstract: Protection from scrotal hyperthermia in laptop computer users…
Image credit: Pitel…
*This blog post was originally published at Medgadget*
November 12th, 2010 by RamonaBatesMD in Better Health Network, News, Opinion, Research
Tags: Backed By Science, Boob Job Cream, Consumer Safety, Cosmetic Products, Cosmetic Surgery, Daily Mail, Doctors Who Voice Their Concerns, Dr. Dalia Nield, Dr. Ramona Bates, Fear Of Retaliation, Increasing A Woman's Breast Size, Libel, Medical Product Claims, Non-Evidence-Based, Patient Safety, Plastic Surgery, Product Safety, Rodial Limited, Scientific Proof, Scientific Testing, Sense About Science, Suture For A Living, The London Clinic, Treatment Dangers, Women's Health
No Comments »
Shouldn’t it be possible to voice a concern about a medical treatment, procedure, or claim without the fear of retaliation? If the claims are backed by science, then simply addressing my concerns would be enough.
Fear of retaliation silences discussion. Fear of retaliation makes it difficult to do the “right thing” when the public or an individual patient is at risk.
This incidence involves a British plastic surgeon threatened with libel action by the ‘Boob Job’ cream’s manufacturer after she voiced concerns/doubts of its effectiveness. Sense About Science has a great summary of the entire affair: “Plastic surgeon threatened for comment on ‘Boob Job’ cream.” Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Suture for a Living*
The FDA will soon require new cigarette package labeling to deter smoking. So in politically-correct governmental fashion, they are asking which labels you’d like to see. (You can pick your favorites here.) My personal favorite (so far) is the one shown to the left, but its impact factor pales in comparison to this example found in England. (That, my friends, is cancer!)
Ironically, it appears the FDA isn’t too sure how forceful it should be in these warnings about the dangers of smoking. They offer a cornucopia of milquetoast labeling options, many of which contain cartoons. Might such unrealistic portrayals defy they hard-hitting message they want to project? Worse, at least one cartoon (seen here) even seems to promote cigarettes AND drug use together!
In an even more astonishing example, some images almost make me what to take up smoking so I can blow big bubbles. Since I could never do this well before, maybe I should take up smoking! Seriously, is an empowerment message what the government wants to portray?
