September 9th, 2010 by EvanFalchukJD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Opinion, Research
Tags: Annals Of Internal Medicine, Attention To Needs Of Patients, Best Doctors, Doctors Under Time Pressure, Error-Free Care, Evan Falchuk, Failure to Individualize Care, Family Medicine, General Medicine, Less Time With Patients, Medical Errors, Not Enough Time For Patients, Patients And Time Starvation, Patients Starved For Time With The Doctor, Primary Care, Scarcity of Doctors' Time, Time Spent With Patients
No Comments »
If you’re into health care consumerism, you’ll enjoy my guest blog post at CDHC Solutions magazine. CDHC Solutions focuses on consumer-driven health plans. Consumer-driven plans are a form of “high deductible” health coverage that is more popular than ever. For whatever you want to say about these plans, one thing is clear: They don’t solve the fundamental problem of patients not having enough time with their doctors.
Here’s a taste of what I wrote:
Researchers have been trying to pinpoint the impact of this time starvation on the quality of medical care, and they’re finding disturbing results. A recent study in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that because of time pressures and related factors, doctors deliver “error-free” care as rarely as 22 percent of the time. The researchers called this a “failure to individualize care,” which is a nice way of saying the doctors just weren’t paying enough attention to the needs of their patients.
Read the whole blog post here.
*This blog post was originally published at See First Blog*
September 9th, 2010 by KevinMD in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion, Research
Tags: Defensive Medicine, Health Affairs, Health Courts, Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Economics, Healthcare reform, Medical Malpractice, Medicine and Legal Issues, No-Fault Malpractice
No Comments »
Nothing polarizes the heath care debate more than defensive medicine. A recent study from Health Affairs will only add more fuel to the fire.
Here’s what I wrote a couple of years ago in USA Today: “When you consider that rampant testing is a major driver of escalating health care dollars, addressing defensive medicine should be a primary goal of cost containment.”
Is that still true? Well, yes and no. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at KevinMD.com*
September 9th, 2010 by Steve Novella, M.D. in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Opinion, Quackery Exposed, Research
Tags: Africa, Anti-HIV Drugs, Anti-Scientific Propaganda, CAM, Complimentary and Alternative Medicine, Evidence-Based, International HIV/AIDS Alliance, International Medicine, Lack of Health Services, Modern Medical Doctors or Facilities, Primary Healthcare, Science Based Medicine, THPAZ, Traditional Healers, Traditional Health Practitioners Association of Zambia, Western Medicine, Western Science, WHO, World Health Organization
No Comments »
There’s an AIDS epidemic in Africa, and efforts to fight it are hampered by the endemic social problems of that continent. Chief among them are the lack of sufficient modern health resources, the spread of destructive rumors and myths about HIV/AIDS, and even the persistence of HIV denial in Africa (although this last factor is better than in the past).
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International HIV/AIDS Alliance are teaming up with the Traditional Health Practitioners Association of Zambia (THPAZ) to address the first problem –- the lack of health services.
Most Zambians use traditional healers for primary healthcare. The WHO has therefore decided to utilize traditional healers in the fight against AIDS. There are interesting pros and cons to this policy, but it must first be recognized that there is no ideal solution to the problem. The resources to provide optimal modern health care to treat and prevent HIV/AIDS (which would need to include a massive education program) in Zambia and the rest of Africa simply do not exist. One might argue that the world should provide those resources, but let’s put that issue aside and focus on what to do in the meantime. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Science-Based Medicine*
September 9th, 2010 by Medgadget in Better Health Network, News, Research
Tags: Blind, Blindness, Braille Buddy, Learning To Read And Write, Lost Eyesight, Ophthalmology, Visually Impaired, Yanko Design
No Comments »
Yanko Design blog is profiling the Braille Buddy project that aims to develop a simple-to-use tool to help people who’ve lost eyesight to learn Braille.
Braille Buddy has little retractable bumps that code for different letters, a keyboard, and a voice synthesizer that guides patients through different lessons. The voice will read out letters that a patient has to type back in Braille, and the tactile screen will display letters to read and identify.
Yanko Design: My Best Buddy Braille…
*This blog post was originally published at Medgadget*
September 8th, 2010 by GarySchwitzer in Better Health Network, Health Policy, Health Tips, News, Opinion, Research
Tags: Andrew Holtz, AP, Associated Press, BRCA 2, BRCA1, Breast Cancer, Cancer Genetics, Evidence-Based Health Media, Gary Schwitzer, Gene Mutation, Health Journalism, HealthNewsReview.org, Inaccurate Health Reporting, JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association, Mastectomy, National Public Radio, NPR, Oncology, Ovarian Cancer, Preventive Cancer Surgery, Preventive Health, Reuters Health
No Comments »
Journalist Andrew Holtz has been a colleague for longer than probably either one of us wants to remember. He is currently one of our story reviewers on HealthNewsReview.org. In fact, he was one of the reviewers on four stories we analyzed last week on the same study. He thought there were some important take-home messages that rose above the walls of our formal systematic review, so he wrote this guest blog post, and we thank him for it:
The Sept. 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association included an article that is likely to have a strong influence on the advice given to women who have a very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer linked to mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Of the four stories we reviewed, only the AP report scored well on our review criteria.
I know what my first journalism professor, Marion Lewenstein, would have done with at least two of the stories: Given them an “F” for factual errors without further consideration of their merits. Read more »
*This blog post was originally published at Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview Blog*
